Cargando…

Understanding how an amphicarpic species with a mixed mating system responds to fire: a population genetic approach

Amphicarpic plants produce both above-ground and below-ground seeds. Because below-ground seeds are protected in the soil and may maintain viability when above-ground conditions are stressful, they were proposed as an adaptation to recolonize a site after disturbance. However, whether below-ground s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meyer, Elena M, Swift, Joel F, Bassüner, Burgund, Smith, Stacy A, Menges, Eric S, Oberle, Brad, Edwards, Christine E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8633637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34858568
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plab067
_version_ 1784607970771861504
author Meyer, Elena M
Swift, Joel F
Bassüner, Burgund
Smith, Stacy A
Menges, Eric S
Oberle, Brad
Edwards, Christine E
author_facet Meyer, Elena M
Swift, Joel F
Bassüner, Burgund
Smith, Stacy A
Menges, Eric S
Oberle, Brad
Edwards, Christine E
author_sort Meyer, Elena M
collection PubMed
description Amphicarpic plants produce both above-ground and below-ground seeds. Because below-ground seeds are protected in the soil and may maintain viability when above-ground conditions are stressful, they were proposed as an adaptation to recolonize a site after disturbance. However, whether below-ground seeds are the main colonizers after a disturbance remains unknown. Our goal was to understand whether recolonization by an amphicarpic species after fire was accomplished primarily through germination of seeds produced above-ground or below-ground. We investigated Polygala lewtonii, an amphicarpic, perennial species endemic to fire-prone Florida sandhill and scrub, where fire kills plants but subsequently increases recruitment and population sizes. Polygala lewtonii produces three flower types: above-ground chasmogamous flowers and above-ground and below-ground cleistogamous flowers, with previous research demonstrating chasmogamous flowers produce a much greater proportion of seeds than cleistogamous flowers. We quantified outcrossing in seeds produced by chasmogamous flowers to determine whether it differed from the 100 % self-fertilized below-ground seeds. Approximately 25 % of seeds from chasmogamous flowers showed evidence of cross-pollination. Assuming that chasmogamous flowers produce the majority of the above-ground seeds, as was shown previously, this indicates it is possible to differentiate between germination by above-ground versus below-ground seeds in post-fire colonization. We next compared genetic diversity, admixture, inbreeding and population genetic structure pre- and post-fire. If fire promoted germination of chasmogamous seeds, heterozygosity and admixture would increase, and genetic structure and inbreeding would decrease. Instead, inbreeding and genetic structure increased and admixture decreased, suggesting that the below-ground selfed seeds (with limited dispersal ability) increased their contribution to the population after fire, possibly because fire reduced above-ground seed viability. Additionally, new alleles not found previously in range-wide analyses emerged from the seed bank post-fire. These results suggest that amphicarpy is a powerful adaptation to preserve genetic variation, maintain adaptive potential and promote rapid post-fire colonization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8633637
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86336372021-12-01 Understanding how an amphicarpic species with a mixed mating system responds to fire: a population genetic approach Meyer, Elena M Swift, Joel F Bassüner, Burgund Smith, Stacy A Menges, Eric S Oberle, Brad Edwards, Christine E AoB Plants Studies Amphicarpic plants produce both above-ground and below-ground seeds. Because below-ground seeds are protected in the soil and may maintain viability when above-ground conditions are stressful, they were proposed as an adaptation to recolonize a site after disturbance. However, whether below-ground seeds are the main colonizers after a disturbance remains unknown. Our goal was to understand whether recolonization by an amphicarpic species after fire was accomplished primarily through germination of seeds produced above-ground or below-ground. We investigated Polygala lewtonii, an amphicarpic, perennial species endemic to fire-prone Florida sandhill and scrub, where fire kills plants but subsequently increases recruitment and population sizes. Polygala lewtonii produces three flower types: above-ground chasmogamous flowers and above-ground and below-ground cleistogamous flowers, with previous research demonstrating chasmogamous flowers produce a much greater proportion of seeds than cleistogamous flowers. We quantified outcrossing in seeds produced by chasmogamous flowers to determine whether it differed from the 100 % self-fertilized below-ground seeds. Approximately 25 % of seeds from chasmogamous flowers showed evidence of cross-pollination. Assuming that chasmogamous flowers produce the majority of the above-ground seeds, as was shown previously, this indicates it is possible to differentiate between germination by above-ground versus below-ground seeds in post-fire colonization. We next compared genetic diversity, admixture, inbreeding and population genetic structure pre- and post-fire. If fire promoted germination of chasmogamous seeds, heterozygosity and admixture would increase, and genetic structure and inbreeding would decrease. Instead, inbreeding and genetic structure increased and admixture decreased, suggesting that the below-ground selfed seeds (with limited dispersal ability) increased their contribution to the population after fire, possibly because fire reduced above-ground seed viability. Additionally, new alleles not found previously in range-wide analyses emerged from the seed bank post-fire. These results suggest that amphicarpy is a powerful adaptation to preserve genetic variation, maintain adaptive potential and promote rapid post-fire colonization. Oxford University Press 2021-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8633637/ /pubmed/34858568 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plab067 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Studies
Meyer, Elena M
Swift, Joel F
Bassüner, Burgund
Smith, Stacy A
Menges, Eric S
Oberle, Brad
Edwards, Christine E
Understanding how an amphicarpic species with a mixed mating system responds to fire: a population genetic approach
title Understanding how an amphicarpic species with a mixed mating system responds to fire: a population genetic approach
title_full Understanding how an amphicarpic species with a mixed mating system responds to fire: a population genetic approach
title_fullStr Understanding how an amphicarpic species with a mixed mating system responds to fire: a population genetic approach
title_full_unstemmed Understanding how an amphicarpic species with a mixed mating system responds to fire: a population genetic approach
title_short Understanding how an amphicarpic species with a mixed mating system responds to fire: a population genetic approach
title_sort understanding how an amphicarpic species with a mixed mating system responds to fire: a population genetic approach
topic Studies
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8633637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34858568
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plab067
work_keys_str_mv AT meyerelenam understandinghowanamphicarpicspecieswithamixedmatingsystemrespondstofireapopulationgeneticapproach
AT swiftjoelf understandinghowanamphicarpicspecieswithamixedmatingsystemrespondstofireapopulationgeneticapproach
AT bassunerburgund understandinghowanamphicarpicspecieswithamixedmatingsystemrespondstofireapopulationgeneticapproach
AT smithstacya understandinghowanamphicarpicspecieswithamixedmatingsystemrespondstofireapopulationgeneticapproach
AT mengeserics understandinghowanamphicarpicspecieswithamixedmatingsystemrespondstofireapopulationgeneticapproach
AT oberlebrad understandinghowanamphicarpicspecieswithamixedmatingsystemrespondstofireapopulationgeneticapproach
AT edwardschristinee understandinghowanamphicarpicspecieswithamixedmatingsystemrespondstofireapopulationgeneticapproach