Cargando…
Measuring changes in alcohol use in Finland and Norway during the COVID‐19 pandemic: Comparison between data sources
OBJECTIVES: To examine (1) how a rapid data collection using a convenience sample fares in estimating change in alcohol consumption when compared to more conventional data sources, and (2) how alcohol consumption changed in Finland and Norway during the first months of the COVID‐19 pandemic. METHODS...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8633923/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34449127 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1892 |
_version_ | 1784608028371189760 |
---|---|
author | Mäkelä, Pia Rossow, Ingeborg Moan, Inger Synnøve Bye, Elin K. Kilian, Carolin Raitasalo, Kirsimarja Allebeck, Peter |
author_facet | Mäkelä, Pia Rossow, Ingeborg Moan, Inger Synnøve Bye, Elin K. Kilian, Carolin Raitasalo, Kirsimarja Allebeck, Peter |
author_sort | Mäkelä, Pia |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To examine (1) how a rapid data collection using a convenience sample fares in estimating change in alcohol consumption when compared to more conventional data sources, and (2) how alcohol consumption changed in Finland and Norway during the first months of the COVID‐19 pandemic. METHODS: Three different types of data sources were used for the 2nd quarter of 2020 and 2019: sales statistics combined with data on unrecorded consumption; the rapid European Alcohol Use and COVID‐19 (ESAC) survey (Finland: n = 3800, Norway: n = 17,092); and conventional population surveys (Finland: n = 2345, Norway: n1 = 1328, n2 = 2189, n3 = 25,708). Survey measures of change were retrospective self‐reports. RESULTS: The statistics indicate that alcohol consumption decreased in Finland by 9%, while little change was observed in Norway. In all surveys, reporting a decrease in alcohol use was more common than reporting an increase (ratios 2–2.6 in Finland, 1.3–2 in Norway). Compared to conventional surveys, in the ESAC survey fewer respondents reported no change and past‐year alcohol consumption was higher. CONCLUSION: The rapid survey using convenience sampling gave similar results on change in drinking as conventional surveys but higher past‐year drinking, suggesting self‐selection effects. Aspects of the pandemic driving alcohol consumption down were equally strong or stronger than those driving it up. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8633923 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86339232021-12-06 Measuring changes in alcohol use in Finland and Norway during the COVID‐19 pandemic: Comparison between data sources Mäkelä, Pia Rossow, Ingeborg Moan, Inger Synnøve Bye, Elin K. Kilian, Carolin Raitasalo, Kirsimarja Allebeck, Peter Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Original Articles OBJECTIVES: To examine (1) how a rapid data collection using a convenience sample fares in estimating change in alcohol consumption when compared to more conventional data sources, and (2) how alcohol consumption changed in Finland and Norway during the first months of the COVID‐19 pandemic. METHODS: Three different types of data sources were used for the 2nd quarter of 2020 and 2019: sales statistics combined with data on unrecorded consumption; the rapid European Alcohol Use and COVID‐19 (ESAC) survey (Finland: n = 3800, Norway: n = 17,092); and conventional population surveys (Finland: n = 2345, Norway: n1 = 1328, n2 = 2189, n3 = 25,708). Survey measures of change were retrospective self‐reports. RESULTS: The statistics indicate that alcohol consumption decreased in Finland by 9%, while little change was observed in Norway. In all surveys, reporting a decrease in alcohol use was more common than reporting an increase (ratios 2–2.6 in Finland, 1.3–2 in Norway). Compared to conventional surveys, in the ESAC survey fewer respondents reported no change and past‐year alcohol consumption was higher. CONCLUSION: The rapid survey using convenience sampling gave similar results on change in drinking as conventional surveys but higher past‐year drinking, suggesting self‐selection effects. Aspects of the pandemic driving alcohol consumption down were equally strong or stronger than those driving it up. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8633923/ /pubmed/34449127 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1892 Text en © 2021 The Authors. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Mäkelä, Pia Rossow, Ingeborg Moan, Inger Synnøve Bye, Elin K. Kilian, Carolin Raitasalo, Kirsimarja Allebeck, Peter Measuring changes in alcohol use in Finland and Norway during the COVID‐19 pandemic: Comparison between data sources |
title | Measuring changes in alcohol use in Finland and Norway during the COVID‐19 pandemic: Comparison between data sources |
title_full | Measuring changes in alcohol use in Finland and Norway during the COVID‐19 pandemic: Comparison between data sources |
title_fullStr | Measuring changes in alcohol use in Finland and Norway during the COVID‐19 pandemic: Comparison between data sources |
title_full_unstemmed | Measuring changes in alcohol use in Finland and Norway during the COVID‐19 pandemic: Comparison between data sources |
title_short | Measuring changes in alcohol use in Finland and Norway during the COVID‐19 pandemic: Comparison between data sources |
title_sort | measuring changes in alcohol use in finland and norway during the covid‐19 pandemic: comparison between data sources |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8633923/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34449127 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1892 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT makelapia measuringchangesinalcoholuseinfinlandandnorwayduringthecovid19pandemiccomparisonbetweendatasources AT rossowingeborg measuringchangesinalcoholuseinfinlandandnorwayduringthecovid19pandemiccomparisonbetweendatasources AT moaningersynnøve measuringchangesinalcoholuseinfinlandandnorwayduringthecovid19pandemiccomparisonbetweendatasources AT byeelink measuringchangesinalcoholuseinfinlandandnorwayduringthecovid19pandemiccomparisonbetweendatasources AT kiliancarolin measuringchangesinalcoholuseinfinlandandnorwayduringthecovid19pandemiccomparisonbetweendatasources AT raitasalokirsimarja measuringchangesinalcoholuseinfinlandandnorwayduringthecovid19pandemiccomparisonbetweendatasources AT allebeckpeter measuringchangesinalcoholuseinfinlandandnorwayduringthecovid19pandemiccomparisonbetweendatasources |