Cargando…

Underestimation of overweight weight status in children and adolescents aged 0‐19 years: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

BACKGROUND: Perceptions of children's weight status may be important in obesity prevention and treatment. AIMS: This review identifies the prevalence of the underestimation of overweight status in children by parents/main carers, children, and healthcare professionals (HCP). The review critical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alshahrani, Abrar, Shuweihdi, Farag, Swift, Judy, Avery, Amanda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8633945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34877014
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/osp4.531
_version_ 1784608033641332736
author Alshahrani, Abrar
Shuweihdi, Farag
Swift, Judy
Avery, Amanda
author_facet Alshahrani, Abrar
Shuweihdi, Farag
Swift, Judy
Avery, Amanda
author_sort Alshahrani, Abrar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Perceptions of children's weight status may be important in obesity prevention and treatment. AIMS: This review identifies the prevalence of the underestimation of overweight status in children by parents/main carers, children, and healthcare professionals (HCP). The review critically synthesized both quantitative and qualitative evidence to explore the factors associated with this underestimation. The diverse methods used to assess this phenomenon are reported. METHODS: Pooled effect sizes were calculated using random‐effects model. Published studies, up to 2020, were accessed using the following search engines: CINAHL, EMBASE, PUBMED, and Psych‐Info and including the “Cited by” and “Related Articles” functions. Hand‐searching was used to retrieve further articles. Publication language and location had no bearing on the nature of the included studies. RESULTS: A total of 91 articles were included. In the quantitative studies, 55% (95% CI 49%–61%) of caregivers underestimated their child's level of overweight and obesity using a verbal scale and 47% (95% CI 36%–55%) using visual scales. Of the children studied, 34% (95% CI 25%–43%) underestimated their own level of overweight and obesity using both scales. In (n = 3) articles, HCPs reflected this misperception, but limited studies prevented meta‐analysis. Underestimation was associated with the child's age, gender, BMI and parental weight status, ethnicity and education. In the qualitative studies, parents/main carers of children with overweight and obesity described their child's weight in terms other than overweight, for example, “big boned,” “thick,” and “solid.” CONCLUSION: The results confirm the prevalence of underestimation of child overweight status across international studies. Understanding the factors which lead to this inaccuracy may help to improve communication within the therapeutic triad and facilitate the recognition and management of children's overweight status.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8633945
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86339452021-12-06 Underestimation of overweight weight status in children and adolescents aged 0‐19 years: A systematic review and meta‐analysis Alshahrani, Abrar Shuweihdi, Farag Swift, Judy Avery, Amanda Obes Sci Pract Review BACKGROUND: Perceptions of children's weight status may be important in obesity prevention and treatment. AIMS: This review identifies the prevalence of the underestimation of overweight status in children by parents/main carers, children, and healthcare professionals (HCP). The review critically synthesized both quantitative and qualitative evidence to explore the factors associated with this underestimation. The diverse methods used to assess this phenomenon are reported. METHODS: Pooled effect sizes were calculated using random‐effects model. Published studies, up to 2020, were accessed using the following search engines: CINAHL, EMBASE, PUBMED, and Psych‐Info and including the “Cited by” and “Related Articles” functions. Hand‐searching was used to retrieve further articles. Publication language and location had no bearing on the nature of the included studies. RESULTS: A total of 91 articles were included. In the quantitative studies, 55% (95% CI 49%–61%) of caregivers underestimated their child's level of overweight and obesity using a verbal scale and 47% (95% CI 36%–55%) using visual scales. Of the children studied, 34% (95% CI 25%–43%) underestimated their own level of overweight and obesity using both scales. In (n = 3) articles, HCPs reflected this misperception, but limited studies prevented meta‐analysis. Underestimation was associated with the child's age, gender, BMI and parental weight status, ethnicity and education. In the qualitative studies, parents/main carers of children with overweight and obesity described their child's weight in terms other than overweight, for example, “big boned,” “thick,” and “solid.” CONCLUSION: The results confirm the prevalence of underestimation of child overweight status across international studies. Understanding the factors which lead to this inaccuracy may help to improve communication within the therapeutic triad and facilitate the recognition and management of children's overweight status. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8633945/ /pubmed/34877014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/osp4.531 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Obesity Science & Practice published by World Obesity and The Obesity Society and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Alshahrani, Abrar
Shuweihdi, Farag
Swift, Judy
Avery, Amanda
Underestimation of overweight weight status in children and adolescents aged 0‐19 years: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title Underestimation of overweight weight status in children and adolescents aged 0‐19 years: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full Underestimation of overweight weight status in children and adolescents aged 0‐19 years: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_fullStr Underestimation of overweight weight status in children and adolescents aged 0‐19 years: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed Underestimation of overweight weight status in children and adolescents aged 0‐19 years: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_short Underestimation of overweight weight status in children and adolescents aged 0‐19 years: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_sort underestimation of overweight weight status in children and adolescents aged 0‐19 years: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8633945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34877014
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/osp4.531
work_keys_str_mv AT alshahraniabrar underestimationofoverweightweightstatusinchildrenandadolescentsaged019yearsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shuweihdifarag underestimationofoverweightweightstatusinchildrenandadolescentsaged019yearsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT swiftjudy underestimationofoverweightweightstatusinchildrenandadolescentsaged019yearsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT averyamanda underestimationofoverweightweightstatusinchildrenandadolescentsaged019yearsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis