Cargando…

Pain mechanisms and management in corneal cross-linking: a review

Though corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) is an increasingly available and effective treatment for keratoconus, few reports have considered its impact on pain-related physiology in depth. This comprehensive narrative review summarises mechanisms underlying pain in CXL and clinical care possibiliti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Valk Bouman, Emilie Sophie, Pump, Heather, Borsook, David, Severinsky, Boris, Wisse, Robert PL, Saeed, Hajirah N, Moulton, Eric A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8633999/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34901466
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2021-000878
_version_ 1784608045471367168
author van der Valk Bouman, Emilie Sophie
Pump, Heather
Borsook, David
Severinsky, Boris
Wisse, Robert PL
Saeed, Hajirah N
Moulton, Eric A
author_facet van der Valk Bouman, Emilie Sophie
Pump, Heather
Borsook, David
Severinsky, Boris
Wisse, Robert PL
Saeed, Hajirah N
Moulton, Eric A
author_sort van der Valk Bouman, Emilie Sophie
collection PubMed
description Though corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) is an increasingly available and effective treatment for keratoconus, few reports have considered its impact on pain-related physiology in depth. This comprehensive narrative review summarises mechanisms underlying pain in CXL and clinical care possibilities, with the goal of future improvement in management of CXL-related pain. Postoperative pain associated with CXL is largely due to primary afferent nerve injury and, to a smaller extent, inflammation. Chronification of pain after CXL has not been reported, even as long-term nerve damage without regeneration following standard CXL treatment is frequently observed. The lack of pain chronification may be due to the minimally invasive nature of the procedure, with its rapidly recovering superficial corneal wound, and to the positive anti-inflammatory changes of the tear film that have been described after CXL. Different CXL approaches have been developed, with the transepithelial epithelial-on technique (epi-on) associated with less postsurgical pain than the gold standard, epithelial-off technique (epi-off). After the first few days, however, the difference in pain scores and need for analgesics between epi-on and epi-off disappear. Patients experience relatively high-intensity pain the first few days post-CXL, and many strategies for acute pain control following CXL have been studied. Currently, no method of pain management is considered superior or universally accepted. Acute pain following CXL is a recognised and clinically significant side effect, but few CXL studies have systematically investigated postoperative pain and its management. This review aims to improve patient pain outcomes following this increasingly common procedure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8633999
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86339992021-12-10 Pain mechanisms and management in corneal cross-linking: a review van der Valk Bouman, Emilie Sophie Pump, Heather Borsook, David Severinsky, Boris Wisse, Robert PL Saeed, Hajirah N Moulton, Eric A BMJ Open Ophthalmol Review Though corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) is an increasingly available and effective treatment for keratoconus, few reports have considered its impact on pain-related physiology in depth. This comprehensive narrative review summarises mechanisms underlying pain in CXL and clinical care possibilities, with the goal of future improvement in management of CXL-related pain. Postoperative pain associated with CXL is largely due to primary afferent nerve injury and, to a smaller extent, inflammation. Chronification of pain after CXL has not been reported, even as long-term nerve damage without regeneration following standard CXL treatment is frequently observed. The lack of pain chronification may be due to the minimally invasive nature of the procedure, with its rapidly recovering superficial corneal wound, and to the positive anti-inflammatory changes of the tear film that have been described after CXL. Different CXL approaches have been developed, with the transepithelial epithelial-on technique (epi-on) associated with less postsurgical pain than the gold standard, epithelial-off technique (epi-off). After the first few days, however, the difference in pain scores and need for analgesics between epi-on and epi-off disappear. Patients experience relatively high-intensity pain the first few days post-CXL, and many strategies for acute pain control following CXL have been studied. Currently, no method of pain management is considered superior or universally accepted. Acute pain following CXL is a recognised and clinically significant side effect, but few CXL studies have systematically investigated postoperative pain and its management. This review aims to improve patient pain outcomes following this increasingly common procedure. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8633999/ /pubmed/34901466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2021-000878 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review
van der Valk Bouman, Emilie Sophie
Pump, Heather
Borsook, David
Severinsky, Boris
Wisse, Robert PL
Saeed, Hajirah N
Moulton, Eric A
Pain mechanisms and management in corneal cross-linking: a review
title Pain mechanisms and management in corneal cross-linking: a review
title_full Pain mechanisms and management in corneal cross-linking: a review
title_fullStr Pain mechanisms and management in corneal cross-linking: a review
title_full_unstemmed Pain mechanisms and management in corneal cross-linking: a review
title_short Pain mechanisms and management in corneal cross-linking: a review
title_sort pain mechanisms and management in corneal cross-linking: a review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8633999/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34901466
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2021-000878
work_keys_str_mv AT vandervalkboumanemiliesophie painmechanismsandmanagementincornealcrosslinkingareview
AT pumpheather painmechanismsandmanagementincornealcrosslinkingareview
AT borsookdavid painmechanismsandmanagementincornealcrosslinkingareview
AT severinskyboris painmechanismsandmanagementincornealcrosslinkingareview
AT wisserobertpl painmechanismsandmanagementincornealcrosslinkingareview
AT saeedhajirahn painmechanismsandmanagementincornealcrosslinkingareview
AT moultonerica painmechanismsandmanagementincornealcrosslinkingareview