Cargando…

Network meta-analysis for comparative effectiveness of treatments for chronic low back pain disorders: systematic review protocol

INTRODUCTION: Chronic low back pain disorders (CLBDs) present a substantial societal burden; however, optimal treatment remains debated. To date, pairwise and network meta-analyses have evaluated individual treatment modes, yet a comparison of a wide range of common treatments is required to evaluat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Belavy, Daniel L, Diwan, Ashish D, Ford, Jon, Miller, Clint T, Hahne, Andrew J, Mundell, Niamh, Tagliaferri, Scott, Bowe, Steven, Pedder, Hugo, Saueressig, Tobias, Zhao, Xiaohui, Chen, Xiaolong, Balasundaram, Arun Prasad, Arora, Nitin Kumar, Owen, Patrick J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8634013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34845083
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057112
_version_ 1784608048893919232
author Belavy, Daniel L
Diwan, Ashish D
Ford, Jon
Miller, Clint T
Hahne, Andrew J
Mundell, Niamh
Tagliaferri, Scott
Bowe, Steven
Pedder, Hugo
Saueressig, Tobias
Zhao, Xiaohui
Chen, Xiaolong
Balasundaram, Arun Prasad
Arora, Nitin Kumar
Owen, Patrick J
author_facet Belavy, Daniel L
Diwan, Ashish D
Ford, Jon
Miller, Clint T
Hahne, Andrew J
Mundell, Niamh
Tagliaferri, Scott
Bowe, Steven
Pedder, Hugo
Saueressig, Tobias
Zhao, Xiaohui
Chen, Xiaolong
Balasundaram, Arun Prasad
Arora, Nitin Kumar
Owen, Patrick J
author_sort Belavy, Daniel L
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Chronic low back pain disorders (CLBDs) present a substantial societal burden; however, optimal treatment remains debated. To date, pairwise and network meta-analyses have evaluated individual treatment modes, yet a comparison of a wide range of common treatments is required to evaluate their relative effectiveness. Using network meta-analysis, we aim to evaluate the effectiveness of treatments (acupuncture, education or advice, electrophysical agents, exercise, manual therapies/manipulation, massage, the McKenzie method, pharmacotherapy, psychological therapies, surgery, epidural injections, percutaneous treatments, traction, physical therapy, multidisciplinary pain management, placebo, ‘usual care’ and/or no treatment) on pain intensity, disability and/or mental health in patients with CLBDs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Six electronic databases and reference lists of 285 prior systematic reviews were searched. Eligible studies will be randomised controlled/clinical trials (including cross-over and cluster designs) that examine individual treatments or treatment combinations in adult patients with CLBDs. Studies must be published in English, German or Chinese as a full-journal publication in a peer-reviewed journal. A narrative approach will be used to synthesise and report qualitative and quantitative data, and, where feasible, network meta-analyses will be performed. Reporting of the review will be informed by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidance, including the network meta-analysis extension (PRISMA-NMA). The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach for network meta-analysis will be implemented for assessing the quality of the findings. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required for this systematic review of the published data. Findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publication. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO registration number CRD42020182039.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8634013
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86340132021-12-10 Network meta-analysis for comparative effectiveness of treatments for chronic low back pain disorders: systematic review protocol Belavy, Daniel L Diwan, Ashish D Ford, Jon Miller, Clint T Hahne, Andrew J Mundell, Niamh Tagliaferri, Scott Bowe, Steven Pedder, Hugo Saueressig, Tobias Zhao, Xiaohui Chen, Xiaolong Balasundaram, Arun Prasad Arora, Nitin Kumar Owen, Patrick J BMJ Open Rehabilitation Medicine INTRODUCTION: Chronic low back pain disorders (CLBDs) present a substantial societal burden; however, optimal treatment remains debated. To date, pairwise and network meta-analyses have evaluated individual treatment modes, yet a comparison of a wide range of common treatments is required to evaluate their relative effectiveness. Using network meta-analysis, we aim to evaluate the effectiveness of treatments (acupuncture, education or advice, electrophysical agents, exercise, manual therapies/manipulation, massage, the McKenzie method, pharmacotherapy, psychological therapies, surgery, epidural injections, percutaneous treatments, traction, physical therapy, multidisciplinary pain management, placebo, ‘usual care’ and/or no treatment) on pain intensity, disability and/or mental health in patients with CLBDs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Six electronic databases and reference lists of 285 prior systematic reviews were searched. Eligible studies will be randomised controlled/clinical trials (including cross-over and cluster designs) that examine individual treatments or treatment combinations in adult patients with CLBDs. Studies must be published in English, German or Chinese as a full-journal publication in a peer-reviewed journal. A narrative approach will be used to synthesise and report qualitative and quantitative data, and, where feasible, network meta-analyses will be performed. Reporting of the review will be informed by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidance, including the network meta-analysis extension (PRISMA-NMA). The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach for network meta-analysis will be implemented for assessing the quality of the findings. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required for this systematic review of the published data. Findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publication. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO registration number CRD42020182039. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8634013/ /pubmed/34845083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057112 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Rehabilitation Medicine
Belavy, Daniel L
Diwan, Ashish D
Ford, Jon
Miller, Clint T
Hahne, Andrew J
Mundell, Niamh
Tagliaferri, Scott
Bowe, Steven
Pedder, Hugo
Saueressig, Tobias
Zhao, Xiaohui
Chen, Xiaolong
Balasundaram, Arun Prasad
Arora, Nitin Kumar
Owen, Patrick J
Network meta-analysis for comparative effectiveness of treatments for chronic low back pain disorders: systematic review protocol
title Network meta-analysis for comparative effectiveness of treatments for chronic low back pain disorders: systematic review protocol
title_full Network meta-analysis for comparative effectiveness of treatments for chronic low back pain disorders: systematic review protocol
title_fullStr Network meta-analysis for comparative effectiveness of treatments for chronic low back pain disorders: systematic review protocol
title_full_unstemmed Network meta-analysis for comparative effectiveness of treatments for chronic low back pain disorders: systematic review protocol
title_short Network meta-analysis for comparative effectiveness of treatments for chronic low back pain disorders: systematic review protocol
title_sort network meta-analysis for comparative effectiveness of treatments for chronic low back pain disorders: systematic review protocol
topic Rehabilitation Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8634013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34845083
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057112
work_keys_str_mv AT belavydaniell networkmetaanalysisforcomparativeeffectivenessoftreatmentsforchroniclowbackpaindisorderssystematicreviewprotocol
AT diwanashishd networkmetaanalysisforcomparativeeffectivenessoftreatmentsforchroniclowbackpaindisorderssystematicreviewprotocol
AT fordjon networkmetaanalysisforcomparativeeffectivenessoftreatmentsforchroniclowbackpaindisorderssystematicreviewprotocol
AT millerclintt networkmetaanalysisforcomparativeeffectivenessoftreatmentsforchroniclowbackpaindisorderssystematicreviewprotocol
AT hahneandrewj networkmetaanalysisforcomparativeeffectivenessoftreatmentsforchroniclowbackpaindisorderssystematicreviewprotocol
AT mundellniamh networkmetaanalysisforcomparativeeffectivenessoftreatmentsforchroniclowbackpaindisorderssystematicreviewprotocol
AT tagliaferriscott networkmetaanalysisforcomparativeeffectivenessoftreatmentsforchroniclowbackpaindisorderssystematicreviewprotocol
AT bowesteven networkmetaanalysisforcomparativeeffectivenessoftreatmentsforchroniclowbackpaindisorderssystematicreviewprotocol
AT pedderhugo networkmetaanalysisforcomparativeeffectivenessoftreatmentsforchroniclowbackpaindisorderssystematicreviewprotocol
AT saueressigtobias networkmetaanalysisforcomparativeeffectivenessoftreatmentsforchroniclowbackpaindisorderssystematicreviewprotocol
AT zhaoxiaohui networkmetaanalysisforcomparativeeffectivenessoftreatmentsforchroniclowbackpaindisorderssystematicreviewprotocol
AT chenxiaolong networkmetaanalysisforcomparativeeffectivenessoftreatmentsforchroniclowbackpaindisorderssystematicreviewprotocol
AT balasundaramarunprasad networkmetaanalysisforcomparativeeffectivenessoftreatmentsforchroniclowbackpaindisorderssystematicreviewprotocol
AT aroranitinkumar networkmetaanalysisforcomparativeeffectivenessoftreatmentsforchroniclowbackpaindisorderssystematicreviewprotocol
AT owenpatrickj networkmetaanalysisforcomparativeeffectivenessoftreatmentsforchroniclowbackpaindisorderssystematicreviewprotocol