Cargando…

Avoiding Crowded Places During COVID-19: Common Sense or a Complex Strategic Decision?

Introduction: Following a period of strict lockdowns during the COVID-19 pandemic, most countries introduced policies in which citizens were expected to avoid crowded places using common sense, as advised by the WHO. We argue that the ambiguity in the recommendation to “avoid crowded places” implici...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stroom, Martijn, Eichholtz, Piet, Kok, Nils
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8634103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34867584
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.700640
_version_ 1784608069320179712
author Stroom, Martijn
Eichholtz, Piet
Kok, Nils
author_facet Stroom, Martijn
Eichholtz, Piet
Kok, Nils
author_sort Stroom, Martijn
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Following a period of strict lockdowns during the COVID-19 pandemic, most countries introduced policies in which citizens were expected to avoid crowded places using common sense, as advised by the WHO. We argue that the ambiguity in the recommendation to “avoid crowded places” implicitly forces individuals to make a complex strategic decision. Methods: Using a Dutch representative sample of 1,048 participants [42% male, mean age=43.78years (SD=12.53), we examine the effect of context on the decision to visit a hypothetical recreational hotspot under the policy recommendation to “avoid crowded places.” We randomize four levels of context on the crowdedness “on the streets” (no context, low, medium, and high context). Subsequently, participants are asked to estimate the percentage of others going out in the same situation. Finally, we assess the impact of a selection of personal characteristics on the likelihood of visiting a crowded place. Results: Respondents are proportionally more likely to go in a low context and high context, compared to no context (diff=0.121, p<0.000, and diff=0.034, p<0.05, respectively) and middle context (diff=0.125, p<0.000, and diff=0.037, p<0.05, respectively). Low context information also decreases the expectation of others going out (−2.63%, z=4.68, p<0.000). High context information increases the expected percentage of others going out (significant only for medium to high context; 2.94%, z=7.34, p<0.001). Furthermore, we show that education, age, and health and risk attitude are all predictive of the likelihood to visit a crowded place, notwithstanding the context. Discussion: Although there is a strong inclination to avoid crowded places during the COVID-19 pandemic (81%), we find two context-driven exceptions: when people expect to avoid crowded spots (in the “low” context, i.e., strategical decision-making) and when people expect others to go (social influence). The freedom provided by ambiguous public policy is implicitly asking more from the population than it initially seems. “Use your common sense” is often the accompanied advice, but our results show that more and better information concerning the context is essential to enable us to make an optimal decision for ourselves, and for society.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8634103
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86341032021-12-02 Avoiding Crowded Places During COVID-19: Common Sense or a Complex Strategic Decision? Stroom, Martijn Eichholtz, Piet Kok, Nils Front Psychol Psychology Introduction: Following a period of strict lockdowns during the COVID-19 pandemic, most countries introduced policies in which citizens were expected to avoid crowded places using common sense, as advised by the WHO. We argue that the ambiguity in the recommendation to “avoid crowded places” implicitly forces individuals to make a complex strategic decision. Methods: Using a Dutch representative sample of 1,048 participants [42% male, mean age=43.78years (SD=12.53), we examine the effect of context on the decision to visit a hypothetical recreational hotspot under the policy recommendation to “avoid crowded places.” We randomize four levels of context on the crowdedness “on the streets” (no context, low, medium, and high context). Subsequently, participants are asked to estimate the percentage of others going out in the same situation. Finally, we assess the impact of a selection of personal characteristics on the likelihood of visiting a crowded place. Results: Respondents are proportionally more likely to go in a low context and high context, compared to no context (diff=0.121, p<0.000, and diff=0.034, p<0.05, respectively) and middle context (diff=0.125, p<0.000, and diff=0.037, p<0.05, respectively). Low context information also decreases the expectation of others going out (−2.63%, z=4.68, p<0.000). High context information increases the expected percentage of others going out (significant only for medium to high context; 2.94%, z=7.34, p<0.001). Furthermore, we show that education, age, and health and risk attitude are all predictive of the likelihood to visit a crowded place, notwithstanding the context. Discussion: Although there is a strong inclination to avoid crowded places during the COVID-19 pandemic (81%), we find two context-driven exceptions: when people expect to avoid crowded spots (in the “low” context, i.e., strategical decision-making) and when people expect others to go (social influence). The freedom provided by ambiguous public policy is implicitly asking more from the population than it initially seems. “Use your common sense” is often the accompanied advice, but our results show that more and better information concerning the context is essential to enable us to make an optimal decision for ourselves, and for society. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8634103/ /pubmed/34867584 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.700640 Text en Copyright © 2021 Stroom, Eichholtz and Kok. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Stroom, Martijn
Eichholtz, Piet
Kok, Nils
Avoiding Crowded Places During COVID-19: Common Sense or a Complex Strategic Decision?
title Avoiding Crowded Places During COVID-19: Common Sense or a Complex Strategic Decision?
title_full Avoiding Crowded Places During COVID-19: Common Sense or a Complex Strategic Decision?
title_fullStr Avoiding Crowded Places During COVID-19: Common Sense or a Complex Strategic Decision?
title_full_unstemmed Avoiding Crowded Places During COVID-19: Common Sense or a Complex Strategic Decision?
title_short Avoiding Crowded Places During COVID-19: Common Sense or a Complex Strategic Decision?
title_sort avoiding crowded places during covid-19: common sense or a complex strategic decision?
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8634103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34867584
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.700640
work_keys_str_mv AT stroommartijn avoidingcrowdedplacesduringcovid19commonsenseoracomplexstrategicdecision
AT eichholtzpiet avoidingcrowdedplacesduringcovid19commonsenseoracomplexstrategicdecision
AT koknils avoidingcrowdedplacesduringcovid19commonsenseoracomplexstrategicdecision