Cargando…

Factors associated with attendance at screening for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: Attendance at population-based breast cancer (mammographic) screening varies. This comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis assesses all identified patient-level factors associated with routine population breast screening attendance. DESIGN: CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, Medl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mottram, Rebecca, Knerr, Wendy Lynn, Gallacher, Daniel, Fraser, Hannah, Al-Khudairy, Lena, Ayorinde, Abimbola, Williamson, Sian, Nduka, Chidozie, Uthman, Olalekan A, Johnson, Samantha, Tsertsvadze, Alexander, Stinton, Christopher, Taylor-Phillips, Sian, Clarke, Aileen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8634222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34848507
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046660
_version_ 1784608091629682688
author Mottram, Rebecca
Knerr, Wendy Lynn
Gallacher, Daniel
Fraser, Hannah
Al-Khudairy, Lena
Ayorinde, Abimbola
Williamson, Sian
Nduka, Chidozie
Uthman, Olalekan A
Johnson, Samantha
Tsertsvadze, Alexander
Stinton, Christopher
Taylor-Phillips, Sian
Clarke, Aileen
author_facet Mottram, Rebecca
Knerr, Wendy Lynn
Gallacher, Daniel
Fraser, Hannah
Al-Khudairy, Lena
Ayorinde, Abimbola
Williamson, Sian
Nduka, Chidozie
Uthman, Olalekan A
Johnson, Samantha
Tsertsvadze, Alexander
Stinton, Christopher
Taylor-Phillips, Sian
Clarke, Aileen
author_sort Mottram, Rebecca
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Attendance at population-based breast cancer (mammographic) screening varies. This comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis assesses all identified patient-level factors associated with routine population breast screening attendance. DESIGN: CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline, OVID, PsycINFO and Web of Science were searched for studies of any design, published January 1987–June 2019, and reporting attendance in relation to at least one patient-level factor. DATA SYNTHESIS: Independent reviewers performed screening, data extraction and quality appraisal. OR and 95% CIs were calculated for attendance for each factor and random-effects meta-analysis was undertaken where possible. RESULTS: Of 19 776 studies, 335 were assessed at full text and 66 studies (n=22 150 922) were included. Risk of bias was generally low. In meta-analysis, increased attendance was associated with higher socioeconomic status (SES) (n=11 studies; OR 1.45, 95% CI: 1.20 to 1.75); higher income (n=5 studies; OR 1.96, 95% CI: 1.68 to 2.29); home ownership (n=3 studies; OR 2.16, 95% CI: 2.08 to 2.23); being non-immigrant (n=7 studies; OR 2.23, 95% CI: 2.00 to 2.48); being married/cohabiting (n=7 studies; OR 1.86, 95% CI: 1.58 to 2.19) and medium (vs low) level of education (n=6 studies; OR 1.24, 95% CI: 1.09 to 1.41). Women with previous false-positive results were less likely to reattend (n=6 studies; OR 0.77, 95% CI: 0.68 to 0.88). There were no differences by age group or by rural versus urban residence. CONCLUSIONS: Attendance was lower in women with lower SES, those who were immigrants, non-homeowners and those with previous false-positive results. Variations in service delivery, screening programmes and study populations may influence findings. Our findings are of univariable associations. Underlying causes of lower uptake such as practical, physical, psychological or financial barriers should be investigated. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42016051597.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8634222
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86342222021-12-10 Factors associated with attendance at screening for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis Mottram, Rebecca Knerr, Wendy Lynn Gallacher, Daniel Fraser, Hannah Al-Khudairy, Lena Ayorinde, Abimbola Williamson, Sian Nduka, Chidozie Uthman, Olalekan A Johnson, Samantha Tsertsvadze, Alexander Stinton, Christopher Taylor-Phillips, Sian Clarke, Aileen BMJ Open Diagnostics OBJECTIVE: Attendance at population-based breast cancer (mammographic) screening varies. This comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis assesses all identified patient-level factors associated with routine population breast screening attendance. DESIGN: CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline, OVID, PsycINFO and Web of Science were searched for studies of any design, published January 1987–June 2019, and reporting attendance in relation to at least one patient-level factor. DATA SYNTHESIS: Independent reviewers performed screening, data extraction and quality appraisal. OR and 95% CIs were calculated for attendance for each factor and random-effects meta-analysis was undertaken where possible. RESULTS: Of 19 776 studies, 335 were assessed at full text and 66 studies (n=22 150 922) were included. Risk of bias was generally low. In meta-analysis, increased attendance was associated with higher socioeconomic status (SES) (n=11 studies; OR 1.45, 95% CI: 1.20 to 1.75); higher income (n=5 studies; OR 1.96, 95% CI: 1.68 to 2.29); home ownership (n=3 studies; OR 2.16, 95% CI: 2.08 to 2.23); being non-immigrant (n=7 studies; OR 2.23, 95% CI: 2.00 to 2.48); being married/cohabiting (n=7 studies; OR 1.86, 95% CI: 1.58 to 2.19) and medium (vs low) level of education (n=6 studies; OR 1.24, 95% CI: 1.09 to 1.41). Women with previous false-positive results were less likely to reattend (n=6 studies; OR 0.77, 95% CI: 0.68 to 0.88). There were no differences by age group or by rural versus urban residence. CONCLUSIONS: Attendance was lower in women with lower SES, those who were immigrants, non-homeowners and those with previous false-positive results. Variations in service delivery, screening programmes and study populations may influence findings. Our findings are of univariable associations. Underlying causes of lower uptake such as practical, physical, psychological or financial barriers should be investigated. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42016051597. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8634222/ /pubmed/34848507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046660 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Diagnostics
Mottram, Rebecca
Knerr, Wendy Lynn
Gallacher, Daniel
Fraser, Hannah
Al-Khudairy, Lena
Ayorinde, Abimbola
Williamson, Sian
Nduka, Chidozie
Uthman, Olalekan A
Johnson, Samantha
Tsertsvadze, Alexander
Stinton, Christopher
Taylor-Phillips, Sian
Clarke, Aileen
Factors associated with attendance at screening for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Factors associated with attendance at screening for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Factors associated with attendance at screening for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Factors associated with attendance at screening for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Factors associated with attendance at screening for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Factors associated with attendance at screening for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort factors associated with attendance at screening for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Diagnostics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8634222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34848507
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046660
work_keys_str_mv AT mottramrebecca factorsassociatedwithattendanceatscreeningforbreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT knerrwendylynn factorsassociatedwithattendanceatscreeningforbreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gallacherdaniel factorsassociatedwithattendanceatscreeningforbreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fraserhannah factorsassociatedwithattendanceatscreeningforbreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT alkhudairylena factorsassociatedwithattendanceatscreeningforbreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ayorindeabimbola factorsassociatedwithattendanceatscreeningforbreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT williamsonsian factorsassociatedwithattendanceatscreeningforbreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ndukachidozie factorsassociatedwithattendanceatscreeningforbreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT uthmanolalekana factorsassociatedwithattendanceatscreeningforbreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT johnsonsamantha factorsassociatedwithattendanceatscreeningforbreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tsertsvadzealexander factorsassociatedwithattendanceatscreeningforbreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT stintonchristopher factorsassociatedwithattendanceatscreeningforbreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT taylorphillipssian factorsassociatedwithattendanceatscreeningforbreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT clarkeaileen factorsassociatedwithattendanceatscreeningforbreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis