Cargando…
Factors associated with attendance at screening for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
OBJECTIVE: Attendance at population-based breast cancer (mammographic) screening varies. This comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis assesses all identified patient-level factors associated with routine population breast screening attendance. DESIGN: CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, Medl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8634222/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34848507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046660 |
_version_ | 1784608091629682688 |
---|---|
author | Mottram, Rebecca Knerr, Wendy Lynn Gallacher, Daniel Fraser, Hannah Al-Khudairy, Lena Ayorinde, Abimbola Williamson, Sian Nduka, Chidozie Uthman, Olalekan A Johnson, Samantha Tsertsvadze, Alexander Stinton, Christopher Taylor-Phillips, Sian Clarke, Aileen |
author_facet | Mottram, Rebecca Knerr, Wendy Lynn Gallacher, Daniel Fraser, Hannah Al-Khudairy, Lena Ayorinde, Abimbola Williamson, Sian Nduka, Chidozie Uthman, Olalekan A Johnson, Samantha Tsertsvadze, Alexander Stinton, Christopher Taylor-Phillips, Sian Clarke, Aileen |
author_sort | Mottram, Rebecca |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Attendance at population-based breast cancer (mammographic) screening varies. This comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis assesses all identified patient-level factors associated with routine population breast screening attendance. DESIGN: CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline, OVID, PsycINFO and Web of Science were searched for studies of any design, published January 1987–June 2019, and reporting attendance in relation to at least one patient-level factor. DATA SYNTHESIS: Independent reviewers performed screening, data extraction and quality appraisal. OR and 95% CIs were calculated for attendance for each factor and random-effects meta-analysis was undertaken where possible. RESULTS: Of 19 776 studies, 335 were assessed at full text and 66 studies (n=22 150 922) were included. Risk of bias was generally low. In meta-analysis, increased attendance was associated with higher socioeconomic status (SES) (n=11 studies; OR 1.45, 95% CI: 1.20 to 1.75); higher income (n=5 studies; OR 1.96, 95% CI: 1.68 to 2.29); home ownership (n=3 studies; OR 2.16, 95% CI: 2.08 to 2.23); being non-immigrant (n=7 studies; OR 2.23, 95% CI: 2.00 to 2.48); being married/cohabiting (n=7 studies; OR 1.86, 95% CI: 1.58 to 2.19) and medium (vs low) level of education (n=6 studies; OR 1.24, 95% CI: 1.09 to 1.41). Women with previous false-positive results were less likely to reattend (n=6 studies; OR 0.77, 95% CI: 0.68 to 0.88). There were no differences by age group or by rural versus urban residence. CONCLUSIONS: Attendance was lower in women with lower SES, those who were immigrants, non-homeowners and those with previous false-positive results. Variations in service delivery, screening programmes and study populations may influence findings. Our findings are of univariable associations. Underlying causes of lower uptake such as practical, physical, psychological or financial barriers should be investigated. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42016051597. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8634222 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86342222021-12-10 Factors associated with attendance at screening for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis Mottram, Rebecca Knerr, Wendy Lynn Gallacher, Daniel Fraser, Hannah Al-Khudairy, Lena Ayorinde, Abimbola Williamson, Sian Nduka, Chidozie Uthman, Olalekan A Johnson, Samantha Tsertsvadze, Alexander Stinton, Christopher Taylor-Phillips, Sian Clarke, Aileen BMJ Open Diagnostics OBJECTIVE: Attendance at population-based breast cancer (mammographic) screening varies. This comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis assesses all identified patient-level factors associated with routine population breast screening attendance. DESIGN: CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline, OVID, PsycINFO and Web of Science were searched for studies of any design, published January 1987–June 2019, and reporting attendance in relation to at least one patient-level factor. DATA SYNTHESIS: Independent reviewers performed screening, data extraction and quality appraisal. OR and 95% CIs were calculated for attendance for each factor and random-effects meta-analysis was undertaken where possible. RESULTS: Of 19 776 studies, 335 were assessed at full text and 66 studies (n=22 150 922) were included. Risk of bias was generally low. In meta-analysis, increased attendance was associated with higher socioeconomic status (SES) (n=11 studies; OR 1.45, 95% CI: 1.20 to 1.75); higher income (n=5 studies; OR 1.96, 95% CI: 1.68 to 2.29); home ownership (n=3 studies; OR 2.16, 95% CI: 2.08 to 2.23); being non-immigrant (n=7 studies; OR 2.23, 95% CI: 2.00 to 2.48); being married/cohabiting (n=7 studies; OR 1.86, 95% CI: 1.58 to 2.19) and medium (vs low) level of education (n=6 studies; OR 1.24, 95% CI: 1.09 to 1.41). Women with previous false-positive results were less likely to reattend (n=6 studies; OR 0.77, 95% CI: 0.68 to 0.88). There were no differences by age group or by rural versus urban residence. CONCLUSIONS: Attendance was lower in women with lower SES, those who were immigrants, non-homeowners and those with previous false-positive results. Variations in service delivery, screening programmes and study populations may influence findings. Our findings are of univariable associations. Underlying causes of lower uptake such as practical, physical, psychological or financial barriers should be investigated. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42016051597. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8634222/ /pubmed/34848507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046660 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Diagnostics Mottram, Rebecca Knerr, Wendy Lynn Gallacher, Daniel Fraser, Hannah Al-Khudairy, Lena Ayorinde, Abimbola Williamson, Sian Nduka, Chidozie Uthman, Olalekan A Johnson, Samantha Tsertsvadze, Alexander Stinton, Christopher Taylor-Phillips, Sian Clarke, Aileen Factors associated with attendance at screening for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Factors associated with attendance at screening for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Factors associated with attendance at screening for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Factors associated with attendance at screening for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Factors associated with attendance at screening for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Factors associated with attendance at screening for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | factors associated with attendance at screening for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Diagnostics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8634222/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34848507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046660 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mottramrebecca factorsassociatedwithattendanceatscreeningforbreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT knerrwendylynn factorsassociatedwithattendanceatscreeningforbreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT gallacherdaniel factorsassociatedwithattendanceatscreeningforbreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT fraserhannah factorsassociatedwithattendanceatscreeningforbreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT alkhudairylena factorsassociatedwithattendanceatscreeningforbreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ayorindeabimbola factorsassociatedwithattendanceatscreeningforbreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT williamsonsian factorsassociatedwithattendanceatscreeningforbreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ndukachidozie factorsassociatedwithattendanceatscreeningforbreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT uthmanolalekana factorsassociatedwithattendanceatscreeningforbreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT johnsonsamantha factorsassociatedwithattendanceatscreeningforbreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT tsertsvadzealexander factorsassociatedwithattendanceatscreeningforbreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT stintonchristopher factorsassociatedwithattendanceatscreeningforbreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT taylorphillipssian factorsassociatedwithattendanceatscreeningforbreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT clarkeaileen factorsassociatedwithattendanceatscreeningforbreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |