Cargando…
Research priorities for the management of complex fractures: a UK priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance
OBJECTIVE: To determine research priorities for the management of complex fractures, which represent the shared priorities of patients, their families, carers and healthcare professionals. DESIGN/SETTING: A national (UK) research priority setting partnership. PARTICIPANTS: People who have experience...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8634374/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34848529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057198 |
_version_ | 1784608118093643776 |
---|---|
author | Bretherton, Christopher Patrick Claireaux, Henry A Gower, Jonathan Martin, Shan Thornhill, Angela Johnson, Louise Silvester, Lucy Kearney, Rebecca Samantha Baxter, Mark Dixon, Paul Giblin, Victoria Griffin, Xavier Luke Eardley, William |
author_facet | Bretherton, Christopher Patrick Claireaux, Henry A Gower, Jonathan Martin, Shan Thornhill, Angela Johnson, Louise Silvester, Lucy Kearney, Rebecca Samantha Baxter, Mark Dixon, Paul Giblin, Victoria Griffin, Xavier Luke Eardley, William |
author_sort | Bretherton, Christopher Patrick |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To determine research priorities for the management of complex fractures, which represent the shared priorities of patients, their families, carers and healthcare professionals. DESIGN/SETTING: A national (UK) research priority setting partnership. PARTICIPANTS: People who have experienced a complex fracture, their carers and relatives, and relevant healthcare professionals and clinical academics involved in treating patients with complex fractures. The scope includes open fractures, fractures to joints broken into multiple pieces, multiple concomitant fractures and fractures involving the pelvis and acetabulum. METHODS: A multiphase priority setting exercise was conducted in partnership with the James Lind Alliance over 21 months (October 2019 to June 2021). A national survey asked respondents to submit their research uncertainties which were then combined into several indicative questions. The existing evidence was searched to ensure that the questions had not already been sufficiently answered. A second national survey asked respondents to prioritise the research questions. A final shortlist of 18 questions was taken to a stakeholder workshop, where a consensus was reached on the top 10 priorities. RESULTS: A total of 532 uncertainties, submitted by 158 respondents (including 33 patients/carers) were received during the initial survey. These were refined into 58 unique indicative questions, of which all 58 were judged to be true uncertainties after review of the existing evidence. 136 people (including 56 patients/carers) responded to the interim prioritisation survey and 18 questions were taken to a final consensus workshop between patients, carers and healthcare professionals. At the final workshop, a consensus was reached for the ranking of the top 10 questions. CONCLUSIONS: The top 10 research priorities for complex fracture include questions regarding rehabilitation, complications, psychological support and return to life-roles. These shared priorities will now be used to guide funders and teams wishing to research complex fractures over the coming decade. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8634374 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86343742021-12-10 Research priorities for the management of complex fractures: a UK priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance Bretherton, Christopher Patrick Claireaux, Henry A Gower, Jonathan Martin, Shan Thornhill, Angela Johnson, Louise Silvester, Lucy Kearney, Rebecca Samantha Baxter, Mark Dixon, Paul Giblin, Victoria Griffin, Xavier Luke Eardley, William BMJ Open Surgery OBJECTIVE: To determine research priorities for the management of complex fractures, which represent the shared priorities of patients, their families, carers and healthcare professionals. DESIGN/SETTING: A national (UK) research priority setting partnership. PARTICIPANTS: People who have experienced a complex fracture, their carers and relatives, and relevant healthcare professionals and clinical academics involved in treating patients with complex fractures. The scope includes open fractures, fractures to joints broken into multiple pieces, multiple concomitant fractures and fractures involving the pelvis and acetabulum. METHODS: A multiphase priority setting exercise was conducted in partnership with the James Lind Alliance over 21 months (October 2019 to June 2021). A national survey asked respondents to submit their research uncertainties which were then combined into several indicative questions. The existing evidence was searched to ensure that the questions had not already been sufficiently answered. A second national survey asked respondents to prioritise the research questions. A final shortlist of 18 questions was taken to a stakeholder workshop, where a consensus was reached on the top 10 priorities. RESULTS: A total of 532 uncertainties, submitted by 158 respondents (including 33 patients/carers) were received during the initial survey. These were refined into 58 unique indicative questions, of which all 58 were judged to be true uncertainties after review of the existing evidence. 136 people (including 56 patients/carers) responded to the interim prioritisation survey and 18 questions were taken to a final consensus workshop between patients, carers and healthcare professionals. At the final workshop, a consensus was reached for the ranking of the top 10 questions. CONCLUSIONS: The top 10 research priorities for complex fracture include questions regarding rehabilitation, complications, psychological support and return to life-roles. These shared priorities will now be used to guide funders and teams wishing to research complex fractures over the coming decade. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8634374/ /pubmed/34848529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057198 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Surgery Bretherton, Christopher Patrick Claireaux, Henry A Gower, Jonathan Martin, Shan Thornhill, Angela Johnson, Louise Silvester, Lucy Kearney, Rebecca Samantha Baxter, Mark Dixon, Paul Giblin, Victoria Griffin, Xavier Luke Eardley, William Research priorities for the management of complex fractures: a UK priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance |
title | Research priorities for the management of complex fractures: a UK priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance |
title_full | Research priorities for the management of complex fractures: a UK priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance |
title_fullStr | Research priorities for the management of complex fractures: a UK priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance |
title_full_unstemmed | Research priorities for the management of complex fractures: a UK priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance |
title_short | Research priorities for the management of complex fractures: a UK priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance |
title_sort | research priorities for the management of complex fractures: a uk priority setting partnership with the james lind alliance |
topic | Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8634374/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34848529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057198 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brethertonchristopherpatrick researchprioritiesforthemanagementofcomplexfracturesaukprioritysettingpartnershipwiththejameslindalliance AT claireauxhenrya researchprioritiesforthemanagementofcomplexfracturesaukprioritysettingpartnershipwiththejameslindalliance AT gowerjonathan researchprioritiesforthemanagementofcomplexfracturesaukprioritysettingpartnershipwiththejameslindalliance AT martinshan researchprioritiesforthemanagementofcomplexfracturesaukprioritysettingpartnershipwiththejameslindalliance AT thornhillangela researchprioritiesforthemanagementofcomplexfracturesaukprioritysettingpartnershipwiththejameslindalliance AT johnsonlouise researchprioritiesforthemanagementofcomplexfracturesaukprioritysettingpartnershipwiththejameslindalliance AT silvesterlucy researchprioritiesforthemanagementofcomplexfracturesaukprioritysettingpartnershipwiththejameslindalliance AT kearneyrebeccasamantha researchprioritiesforthemanagementofcomplexfracturesaukprioritysettingpartnershipwiththejameslindalliance AT baxtermark researchprioritiesforthemanagementofcomplexfracturesaukprioritysettingpartnershipwiththejameslindalliance AT dixonpaul researchprioritiesforthemanagementofcomplexfracturesaukprioritysettingpartnershipwiththejameslindalliance AT giblinvictoria researchprioritiesforthemanagementofcomplexfracturesaukprioritysettingpartnershipwiththejameslindalliance AT griffinxavierluke researchprioritiesforthemanagementofcomplexfracturesaukprioritysettingpartnershipwiththejameslindalliance AT eardleywilliam researchprioritiesforthemanagementofcomplexfracturesaukprioritysettingpartnershipwiththejameslindalliance |