Cargando…

Inequality of access to advanced therapies for patients with inflammatory arthritis: a postcode lottery?

OBJECTIVES: Advanced therapies (AT), including biologics, biosimilars and Janus kinase inhibitors, have dramatically improved the quality of life of patients with RA, PsA and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Evidence-based criteria for prescribing these drugs in England and Wales is formulated by th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaul, Arvind, Mistry, Jatin, Iagnocco, Annamaria, Baraliakos, Xenofon, Bosworth, Ailsa, McNicol, Iain
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8634385/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34859176
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rap/rkab081
_version_ 1784608120516902912
author Kaul, Arvind
Mistry, Jatin
Iagnocco, Annamaria
Baraliakos, Xenofon
Bosworth, Ailsa
McNicol, Iain
author_facet Kaul, Arvind
Mistry, Jatin
Iagnocco, Annamaria
Baraliakos, Xenofon
Bosworth, Ailsa
McNicol, Iain
author_sort Kaul, Arvind
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Advanced therapies (AT), including biologics, biosimilars and Janus kinase inhibitors, have dramatically improved the quality of life of patients with RA, PsA and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Evidence-based criteria for prescribing these drugs in England and Wales is formulated by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) through health technology appraisals and guidelines, with the aim of providing equitable access to AT for patients with severe or resistant disease. Similar bodies exist in some, but not all European countries, with disparities in AT access between countries for RA. We examined whether this disparity was mirrored in England for RA, PsA and axSpA despite the National Health Service in England and Wales being legally obliged to provide funding for AT recommended by NICE’s Health Technology Appraisal board, through the commissioning bodies, the clinical commissioning groups (CCGs). METHODS: We requested AT pathways from CCGs in England. Where these were not available, individual hospital Trusts were contacted using freedom of information requests. RESULTS: We found marked variability in the way that CCGs in England interpret NICE guidance. We found 41, 29 and 25 different pathways for RA, PsA and axSpA, respectively. Similar disparities existed with sequential prescribing where one AT did not work, with limits on the numbers of sequential AT in 54%, 59% and 59% of CCGs for RA, PsA and axSpA, respectively, and with these limits being different for the same condition between CCGs. CONCLUSION: Although patients at identical stages of their disease course should have access to the same NICE-approved AT, we found this is not the case for large parts of England. Inequality of access was found between regions, mirroring the variability that occurs between countries throughout Europe. Harmonization of access needs to be addressed by policymakers to ensure fairness in the way that clinicians and patients can access AT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8634385
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86343852021-12-01 Inequality of access to advanced therapies for patients with inflammatory arthritis: a postcode lottery? Kaul, Arvind Mistry, Jatin Iagnocco, Annamaria Baraliakos, Xenofon Bosworth, Ailsa McNicol, Iain Rheumatol Adv Pract Concise Report OBJECTIVES: Advanced therapies (AT), including biologics, biosimilars and Janus kinase inhibitors, have dramatically improved the quality of life of patients with RA, PsA and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Evidence-based criteria for prescribing these drugs in England and Wales is formulated by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) through health technology appraisals and guidelines, with the aim of providing equitable access to AT for patients with severe or resistant disease. Similar bodies exist in some, but not all European countries, with disparities in AT access between countries for RA. We examined whether this disparity was mirrored in England for RA, PsA and axSpA despite the National Health Service in England and Wales being legally obliged to provide funding for AT recommended by NICE’s Health Technology Appraisal board, through the commissioning bodies, the clinical commissioning groups (CCGs). METHODS: We requested AT pathways from CCGs in England. Where these were not available, individual hospital Trusts were contacted using freedom of information requests. RESULTS: We found marked variability in the way that CCGs in England interpret NICE guidance. We found 41, 29 and 25 different pathways for RA, PsA and axSpA, respectively. Similar disparities existed with sequential prescribing where one AT did not work, with limits on the numbers of sequential AT in 54%, 59% and 59% of CCGs for RA, PsA and axSpA, respectively, and with these limits being different for the same condition between CCGs. CONCLUSION: Although patients at identical stages of their disease course should have access to the same NICE-approved AT, we found this is not the case for large parts of England. Inequality of access was found between regions, mirroring the variability that occurs between countries throughout Europe. Harmonization of access needs to be addressed by policymakers to ensure fairness in the way that clinicians and patients can access AT. Oxford University Press 2021-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8634385/ /pubmed/34859176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rap/rkab081 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Concise Report
Kaul, Arvind
Mistry, Jatin
Iagnocco, Annamaria
Baraliakos, Xenofon
Bosworth, Ailsa
McNicol, Iain
Inequality of access to advanced therapies for patients with inflammatory arthritis: a postcode lottery?
title Inequality of access to advanced therapies for patients with inflammatory arthritis: a postcode lottery?
title_full Inequality of access to advanced therapies for patients with inflammatory arthritis: a postcode lottery?
title_fullStr Inequality of access to advanced therapies for patients with inflammatory arthritis: a postcode lottery?
title_full_unstemmed Inequality of access to advanced therapies for patients with inflammatory arthritis: a postcode lottery?
title_short Inequality of access to advanced therapies for patients with inflammatory arthritis: a postcode lottery?
title_sort inequality of access to advanced therapies for patients with inflammatory arthritis: a postcode lottery?
topic Concise Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8634385/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34859176
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rap/rkab081
work_keys_str_mv AT kaularvind inequalityofaccesstoadvancedtherapiesforpatientswithinflammatoryarthritisapostcodelottery
AT mistryjatin inequalityofaccesstoadvancedtherapiesforpatientswithinflammatoryarthritisapostcodelottery
AT iagnoccoannamaria inequalityofaccesstoadvancedtherapiesforpatientswithinflammatoryarthritisapostcodelottery
AT baraliakosxenofon inequalityofaccesstoadvancedtherapiesforpatientswithinflammatoryarthritisapostcodelottery
AT bosworthailsa inequalityofaccesstoadvancedtherapiesforpatientswithinflammatoryarthritisapostcodelottery
AT mcnicoliain inequalityofaccesstoadvancedtherapiesforpatientswithinflammatoryarthritisapostcodelottery