Cargando…

Synthetic Control Methods for the Evaluation of Single-Unit Interventions in Epidemiology: A Tutorial

Evaluating the impacts of population-level interventions (e.g., changes to state legislation) can be challenging as conducting randomized experiments is often impractical and inappropriate, especially in settings where the intervention is implemented in a single, aggregate unit (e.g., a country or s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bonander, Carl, Humphreys, David, Degli Esposti, Michelle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8634614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34343240
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwab211
_version_ 1784608156351987712
author Bonander, Carl
Humphreys, David
Degli Esposti, Michelle
author_facet Bonander, Carl
Humphreys, David
Degli Esposti, Michelle
author_sort Bonander, Carl
collection PubMed
description Evaluating the impacts of population-level interventions (e.g., changes to state legislation) can be challenging as conducting randomized experiments is often impractical and inappropriate, especially in settings where the intervention is implemented in a single, aggregate unit (e.g., a country or state). A common nonrandomized alternative is to compare outcomes in the treated unit(s) with unexposed controls both before and after the intervention. However, the validity of these designs depends on the use of controls that closely resemble the treated unit on before-intervention characteristics and trends on the outcome, and suitable controls may be difficult to find because the number of potential control regions is typically limited. The synthetic control method provides a potential solution to these problems by using a data-driven algorithm to identify an optimal weighted control unit—a “synthetic control”—based on data from before the intervention from available control units. While popular in the social sciences, the method has not garnered as much attention in health research, perhaps due to a lack of accessible texts aimed at health researchers. We address this gap by providing a comprehensive, nontechnical tutorial on the synthetic control method, using a worked example evaluating Florida’s “stand your ground” law to illustrate methodological and practical considerations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8634614
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86346142021-12-02 Synthetic Control Methods for the Evaluation of Single-Unit Interventions in Epidemiology: A Tutorial Bonander, Carl Humphreys, David Degli Esposti, Michelle Am J Epidemiol Practice of Epidemiology Evaluating the impacts of population-level interventions (e.g., changes to state legislation) can be challenging as conducting randomized experiments is often impractical and inappropriate, especially in settings where the intervention is implemented in a single, aggregate unit (e.g., a country or state). A common nonrandomized alternative is to compare outcomes in the treated unit(s) with unexposed controls both before and after the intervention. However, the validity of these designs depends on the use of controls that closely resemble the treated unit on before-intervention characteristics and trends on the outcome, and suitable controls may be difficult to find because the number of potential control regions is typically limited. The synthetic control method provides a potential solution to these problems by using a data-driven algorithm to identify an optimal weighted control unit—a “synthetic control”—based on data from before the intervention from available control units. While popular in the social sciences, the method has not garnered as much attention in health research, perhaps due to a lack of accessible texts aimed at health researchers. We address this gap by providing a comprehensive, nontechnical tutorial on the synthetic control method, using a worked example evaluating Florida’s “stand your ground” law to illustrate methodological and practical considerations. Oxford University Press 2021-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8634614/ /pubmed/34343240 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwab211 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Practice of Epidemiology
Bonander, Carl
Humphreys, David
Degli Esposti, Michelle
Synthetic Control Methods for the Evaluation of Single-Unit Interventions in Epidemiology: A Tutorial
title Synthetic Control Methods for the Evaluation of Single-Unit Interventions in Epidemiology: A Tutorial
title_full Synthetic Control Methods for the Evaluation of Single-Unit Interventions in Epidemiology: A Tutorial
title_fullStr Synthetic Control Methods for the Evaluation of Single-Unit Interventions in Epidemiology: A Tutorial
title_full_unstemmed Synthetic Control Methods for the Evaluation of Single-Unit Interventions in Epidemiology: A Tutorial
title_short Synthetic Control Methods for the Evaluation of Single-Unit Interventions in Epidemiology: A Tutorial
title_sort synthetic control methods for the evaluation of single-unit interventions in epidemiology: a tutorial
topic Practice of Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8634614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34343240
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwab211
work_keys_str_mv AT bonandercarl syntheticcontrolmethodsfortheevaluationofsingleunitinterventionsinepidemiologyatutorial
AT humphreysdavid syntheticcontrolmethodsfortheevaluationofsingleunitinterventionsinepidemiologyatutorial
AT degliespostimichelle syntheticcontrolmethodsfortheevaluationofsingleunitinterventionsinepidemiologyatutorial