Cargando…

Differences in Fecal Microbiome and Antimicrobial Resistance between Captive and Free-Range Sika Deer under the Same Exposure of Antibiotic Anthelmintics

This study aimed to compare the fecal microbiome and antimicrobial resistance between captive and free-range sika deer with the same exposure to antibiotic anthelmintics. The taxonomic differences mainly involved significant changes in the dominant phyla, genera, and species. Linear discriminant ana...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Kangqi, Xu, Yongtao, Zhang, Weiwei, Mao, Huirong, Chen, Biao, Zheng, Yunlin, Hu, Xiaolong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8635127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34851181
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/Spectrum.01918-21
_version_ 1784608240099655680
author Wu, Kangqi
Xu, Yongtao
Zhang, Weiwei
Mao, Huirong
Chen, Biao
Zheng, Yunlin
Hu, Xiaolong
author_facet Wu, Kangqi
Xu, Yongtao
Zhang, Weiwei
Mao, Huirong
Chen, Biao
Zheng, Yunlin
Hu, Xiaolong
author_sort Wu, Kangqi
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to compare the fecal microbiome and antimicrobial resistance between captive and free-range sika deer with the same exposure to antibiotic anthelmintics. The taxonomic differences mainly involved significant changes in the dominant phyla, genera, and species. Linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) analysis revealed that 22 taxa were significantly different between the two groups. The KEGG analysis showed that the fecal microbiome metabolic function, and all level 2 categories in metabolism had higher abundance in the free-range deer. Based on the carbohydrate-active enzyme (CAZy) database analysis, glycoside hydrolases and carbohydrate-binding modules showed remarkable differences between the two groups. Regarding antibiotic resistance, tetQ and lnuC dominated the antibiotic resistance ontology (ARO) terms, and tetracycline and lincosamide resistance dominated the antimicrobial resistance patterns. Furthermore, the lnuC, ErmF, and tetW/N/W AROs and lincosamide resistance showed higher abundance in the captive deer, suggesting that captivity may yield more serious resistance issues because of the differences in greenfeed diet, breeding density, and/or housing environment. The results also revealed important associations between the phylum Proteobacteria, genus Prevotella, and major antibiotic resistance genes. Although the present study was a pilot study with a limited sample size that was insufficient control for some potential factors, it serves as the metagenomic study on the microbial communities and antimicrobial resistance in sika deer. IMPORTANCE We used a metagenomic approach to investigate whether and how captive and free-range impact the microbial communities and antimicrobial resistance in sika deer. The results provide solid evidence of the significant impacts on the microbial composition and function in captive and free-range sika deer. Interestingly, although the sika deer had the same exposure to antibiotic anthelmintics, the antimicrobial resistances were affected by the breeding environment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8635127
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher American Society for Microbiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86351272021-12-06 Differences in Fecal Microbiome and Antimicrobial Resistance between Captive and Free-Range Sika Deer under the Same Exposure of Antibiotic Anthelmintics Wu, Kangqi Xu, Yongtao Zhang, Weiwei Mao, Huirong Chen, Biao Zheng, Yunlin Hu, Xiaolong Microbiol Spectr Research Article This study aimed to compare the fecal microbiome and antimicrobial resistance between captive and free-range sika deer with the same exposure to antibiotic anthelmintics. The taxonomic differences mainly involved significant changes in the dominant phyla, genera, and species. Linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) analysis revealed that 22 taxa were significantly different between the two groups. The KEGG analysis showed that the fecal microbiome metabolic function, and all level 2 categories in metabolism had higher abundance in the free-range deer. Based on the carbohydrate-active enzyme (CAZy) database analysis, glycoside hydrolases and carbohydrate-binding modules showed remarkable differences between the two groups. Regarding antibiotic resistance, tetQ and lnuC dominated the antibiotic resistance ontology (ARO) terms, and tetracycline and lincosamide resistance dominated the antimicrobial resistance patterns. Furthermore, the lnuC, ErmF, and tetW/N/W AROs and lincosamide resistance showed higher abundance in the captive deer, suggesting that captivity may yield more serious resistance issues because of the differences in greenfeed diet, breeding density, and/or housing environment. The results also revealed important associations between the phylum Proteobacteria, genus Prevotella, and major antibiotic resistance genes. Although the present study was a pilot study with a limited sample size that was insufficient control for some potential factors, it serves as the metagenomic study on the microbial communities and antimicrobial resistance in sika deer. IMPORTANCE We used a metagenomic approach to investigate whether and how captive and free-range impact the microbial communities and antimicrobial resistance in sika deer. The results provide solid evidence of the significant impacts on the microbial composition and function in captive and free-range sika deer. Interestingly, although the sika deer had the same exposure to antibiotic anthelmintics, the antimicrobial resistances were affected by the breeding environment. American Society for Microbiology 2021-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8635127/ /pubmed/34851181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/Spectrum.01918-21 Text en Copyright © 2021 Wu et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Article
Wu, Kangqi
Xu, Yongtao
Zhang, Weiwei
Mao, Huirong
Chen, Biao
Zheng, Yunlin
Hu, Xiaolong
Differences in Fecal Microbiome and Antimicrobial Resistance between Captive and Free-Range Sika Deer under the Same Exposure of Antibiotic Anthelmintics
title Differences in Fecal Microbiome and Antimicrobial Resistance between Captive and Free-Range Sika Deer under the Same Exposure of Antibiotic Anthelmintics
title_full Differences in Fecal Microbiome and Antimicrobial Resistance between Captive and Free-Range Sika Deer under the Same Exposure of Antibiotic Anthelmintics
title_fullStr Differences in Fecal Microbiome and Antimicrobial Resistance between Captive and Free-Range Sika Deer under the Same Exposure of Antibiotic Anthelmintics
title_full_unstemmed Differences in Fecal Microbiome and Antimicrobial Resistance between Captive and Free-Range Sika Deer under the Same Exposure of Antibiotic Anthelmintics
title_short Differences in Fecal Microbiome and Antimicrobial Resistance between Captive and Free-Range Sika Deer under the Same Exposure of Antibiotic Anthelmintics
title_sort differences in fecal microbiome and antimicrobial resistance between captive and free-range sika deer under the same exposure of antibiotic anthelmintics
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8635127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34851181
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/Spectrum.01918-21
work_keys_str_mv AT wukangqi differencesinfecalmicrobiomeandantimicrobialresistancebetweencaptiveandfreerangesikadeerunderthesameexposureofantibioticanthelmintics
AT xuyongtao differencesinfecalmicrobiomeandantimicrobialresistancebetweencaptiveandfreerangesikadeerunderthesameexposureofantibioticanthelmintics
AT zhangweiwei differencesinfecalmicrobiomeandantimicrobialresistancebetweencaptiveandfreerangesikadeerunderthesameexposureofantibioticanthelmintics
AT maohuirong differencesinfecalmicrobiomeandantimicrobialresistancebetweencaptiveandfreerangesikadeerunderthesameexposureofantibioticanthelmintics
AT chenbiao differencesinfecalmicrobiomeandantimicrobialresistancebetweencaptiveandfreerangesikadeerunderthesameexposureofantibioticanthelmintics
AT zhengyunlin differencesinfecalmicrobiomeandantimicrobialresistancebetweencaptiveandfreerangesikadeerunderthesameexposureofantibioticanthelmintics
AT huxiaolong differencesinfecalmicrobiomeandantimicrobialresistancebetweencaptiveandfreerangesikadeerunderthesameexposureofantibioticanthelmintics