Cargando…
Articaine use does not routinely eliminate the need for palatal injections for primary maxillary molar extractions: a randomized cross-over clinical trial
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare single buccal infiltration of 4% articaine versus routine buccal and palatal injections of 2% lidocaine during bilateral extraction of maxillary primary molars. METHODS: Thirty healthy children aged 6–9 years old requiring bilateral extraction of maxilla...
Autores principales: | Bahrololoomi, Zahra, Maghsoudi, Nahid |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8635313/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34853915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10006-021-01021-2 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Buccal infiltration injection without a 4% articaine palatal injection for maxillary impacted third molar surgery
por: Sochenda, Som, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Anesthetic efficacy of single buccal infiltration of 4% articaine compared to routine inferior alveolar nerve block with 2% lidocaine during bilateral extraction of mandibular primary molars: a randomized controlled trial
por: Bahrololoomi, Zahra, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
The Efficacy of Buccal Infiltration of 4% Articaine and PSA Injection of 2% Lidocaine on Anesthesia of Maxillary Second Molars
por: Maljaei, Ensiyeh, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Buffered articaine infiltration for primary maxillary molar extractions: a randomized controlled study
por: Dhake, Parag, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
The Effectiveness of Articaine and Lidocaine Single Buccal Infiltration versus Conventional Buccal and Palatal Injection Using Lidocaine during Primary Maxillary Molar Extraction: A Randomized Control Trial
por: Kolli, Naveen Kumar Reddy, et al.
Publicado: (2017)