Cargando…

Development of prediction models of spontaneous ureteral stone passage through machine learning: Comparison with conventional statistical analysis

OBJECTIVES: To develop a prediction model of spontaneous ureteral stone passage (SSP) using machine learning and logistic regression and compare the performance of the two models. Indications for management of ureteral stones are unclear, and the clinician determines whether to wait for SSP or perfo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Jee Soo, Kim, Dong Wook, Lee, Dongu, Lee, Taeju, Koo, Kyo Chul, Han, Woong Kyu, Chung, Byung Ha, Lee, Kwang Suk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8635399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34851999
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260517
_version_ 1784608294750388224
author Park, Jee Soo
Kim, Dong Wook
Lee, Dongu
Lee, Taeju
Koo, Kyo Chul
Han, Woong Kyu
Chung, Byung Ha
Lee, Kwang Suk
author_facet Park, Jee Soo
Kim, Dong Wook
Lee, Dongu
Lee, Taeju
Koo, Kyo Chul
Han, Woong Kyu
Chung, Byung Ha
Lee, Kwang Suk
author_sort Park, Jee Soo
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To develop a prediction model of spontaneous ureteral stone passage (SSP) using machine learning and logistic regression and compare the performance of the two models. Indications for management of ureteral stones are unclear, and the clinician determines whether to wait for SSP or perform active treatment, especially in well-controlled patients, to avoid unwanted complications. Therefore, suggesting the possibility of SSP would help make a clinical decision regarding ureteral stones. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with unilateral ureteral stones at our emergency department between August 2014 and September 2018 were included and underwent non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography 4 weeks from the first stone episode. Predictors of SSP were applied to build and validate the prediction model using multilayer perceptron (MLP) with the Keras framework. RESULTS: Of 833 patients, SSP was observed in 606 (72.7%). SSP rates were 68.2% and 75.6% for stone sizes 5–10 mm and <5 mm, respectively. Stone opacity, location, and whether it was the first ureteral stone episode were significant predictors of SSP. Areas under the curve (AUCs) for receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for MLP, and logistic regression were 0.859 and 0.847, respectively, for stones <5 mm, and 0.881 and 0.817, respectively, for 5–10 mm stones. CONCLUSION: SSP prediction models were developed in patients with well-controlled unilateral ureteral stones; the performance of the models was good, especially in identifying SSP for 5–10-mm ureteral stones without definite treatment guidelines. To further improve the performance of these models, future studies should focus on using machine learning techniques in image analysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8635399
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86353992021-12-02 Development of prediction models of spontaneous ureteral stone passage through machine learning: Comparison with conventional statistical analysis Park, Jee Soo Kim, Dong Wook Lee, Dongu Lee, Taeju Koo, Kyo Chul Han, Woong Kyu Chung, Byung Ha Lee, Kwang Suk PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: To develop a prediction model of spontaneous ureteral stone passage (SSP) using machine learning and logistic regression and compare the performance of the two models. Indications for management of ureteral stones are unclear, and the clinician determines whether to wait for SSP or perform active treatment, especially in well-controlled patients, to avoid unwanted complications. Therefore, suggesting the possibility of SSP would help make a clinical decision regarding ureteral stones. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with unilateral ureteral stones at our emergency department between August 2014 and September 2018 were included and underwent non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography 4 weeks from the first stone episode. Predictors of SSP were applied to build and validate the prediction model using multilayer perceptron (MLP) with the Keras framework. RESULTS: Of 833 patients, SSP was observed in 606 (72.7%). SSP rates were 68.2% and 75.6% for stone sizes 5–10 mm and <5 mm, respectively. Stone opacity, location, and whether it was the first ureteral stone episode were significant predictors of SSP. Areas under the curve (AUCs) for receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for MLP, and logistic regression were 0.859 and 0.847, respectively, for stones <5 mm, and 0.881 and 0.817, respectively, for 5–10 mm stones. CONCLUSION: SSP prediction models were developed in patients with well-controlled unilateral ureteral stones; the performance of the models was good, especially in identifying SSP for 5–10-mm ureteral stones without definite treatment guidelines. To further improve the performance of these models, future studies should focus on using machine learning techniques in image analysis. Public Library of Science 2021-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8635399/ /pubmed/34851999 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260517 Text en © 2021 Park et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Park, Jee Soo
Kim, Dong Wook
Lee, Dongu
Lee, Taeju
Koo, Kyo Chul
Han, Woong Kyu
Chung, Byung Ha
Lee, Kwang Suk
Development of prediction models of spontaneous ureteral stone passage through machine learning: Comparison with conventional statistical analysis
title Development of prediction models of spontaneous ureteral stone passage through machine learning: Comparison with conventional statistical analysis
title_full Development of prediction models of spontaneous ureteral stone passage through machine learning: Comparison with conventional statistical analysis
title_fullStr Development of prediction models of spontaneous ureteral stone passage through machine learning: Comparison with conventional statistical analysis
title_full_unstemmed Development of prediction models of spontaneous ureteral stone passage through machine learning: Comparison with conventional statistical analysis
title_short Development of prediction models of spontaneous ureteral stone passage through machine learning: Comparison with conventional statistical analysis
title_sort development of prediction models of spontaneous ureteral stone passage through machine learning: comparison with conventional statistical analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8635399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34851999
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260517
work_keys_str_mv AT parkjeesoo developmentofpredictionmodelsofspontaneousureteralstonepassagethroughmachinelearningcomparisonwithconventionalstatisticalanalysis
AT kimdongwook developmentofpredictionmodelsofspontaneousureteralstonepassagethroughmachinelearningcomparisonwithconventionalstatisticalanalysis
AT leedongu developmentofpredictionmodelsofspontaneousureteralstonepassagethroughmachinelearningcomparisonwithconventionalstatisticalanalysis
AT leetaeju developmentofpredictionmodelsofspontaneousureteralstonepassagethroughmachinelearningcomparisonwithconventionalstatisticalanalysis
AT kookyochul developmentofpredictionmodelsofspontaneousureteralstonepassagethroughmachinelearningcomparisonwithconventionalstatisticalanalysis
AT hanwoongkyu developmentofpredictionmodelsofspontaneousureteralstonepassagethroughmachinelearningcomparisonwithconventionalstatisticalanalysis
AT chungbyungha developmentofpredictionmodelsofspontaneousureteralstonepassagethroughmachinelearningcomparisonwithconventionalstatisticalanalysis
AT leekwangsuk developmentofpredictionmodelsofspontaneousureteralstonepassagethroughmachinelearningcomparisonwithconventionalstatisticalanalysis