Cargando…
Development of prediction models of spontaneous ureteral stone passage through machine learning: Comparison with conventional statistical analysis
OBJECTIVES: To develop a prediction model of spontaneous ureteral stone passage (SSP) using machine learning and logistic regression and compare the performance of the two models. Indications for management of ureteral stones are unclear, and the clinician determines whether to wait for SSP or perfo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8635399/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34851999 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260517 |
_version_ | 1784608294750388224 |
---|---|
author | Park, Jee Soo Kim, Dong Wook Lee, Dongu Lee, Taeju Koo, Kyo Chul Han, Woong Kyu Chung, Byung Ha Lee, Kwang Suk |
author_facet | Park, Jee Soo Kim, Dong Wook Lee, Dongu Lee, Taeju Koo, Kyo Chul Han, Woong Kyu Chung, Byung Ha Lee, Kwang Suk |
author_sort | Park, Jee Soo |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To develop a prediction model of spontaneous ureteral stone passage (SSP) using machine learning and logistic regression and compare the performance of the two models. Indications for management of ureteral stones are unclear, and the clinician determines whether to wait for SSP or perform active treatment, especially in well-controlled patients, to avoid unwanted complications. Therefore, suggesting the possibility of SSP would help make a clinical decision regarding ureteral stones. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with unilateral ureteral stones at our emergency department between August 2014 and September 2018 were included and underwent non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography 4 weeks from the first stone episode. Predictors of SSP were applied to build and validate the prediction model using multilayer perceptron (MLP) with the Keras framework. RESULTS: Of 833 patients, SSP was observed in 606 (72.7%). SSP rates were 68.2% and 75.6% for stone sizes 5–10 mm and <5 mm, respectively. Stone opacity, location, and whether it was the first ureteral stone episode were significant predictors of SSP. Areas under the curve (AUCs) for receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for MLP, and logistic regression were 0.859 and 0.847, respectively, for stones <5 mm, and 0.881 and 0.817, respectively, for 5–10 mm stones. CONCLUSION: SSP prediction models were developed in patients with well-controlled unilateral ureteral stones; the performance of the models was good, especially in identifying SSP for 5–10-mm ureteral stones without definite treatment guidelines. To further improve the performance of these models, future studies should focus on using machine learning techniques in image analysis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8635399 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86353992021-12-02 Development of prediction models of spontaneous ureteral stone passage through machine learning: Comparison with conventional statistical analysis Park, Jee Soo Kim, Dong Wook Lee, Dongu Lee, Taeju Koo, Kyo Chul Han, Woong Kyu Chung, Byung Ha Lee, Kwang Suk PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: To develop a prediction model of spontaneous ureteral stone passage (SSP) using machine learning and logistic regression and compare the performance of the two models. Indications for management of ureteral stones are unclear, and the clinician determines whether to wait for SSP or perform active treatment, especially in well-controlled patients, to avoid unwanted complications. Therefore, suggesting the possibility of SSP would help make a clinical decision regarding ureteral stones. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with unilateral ureteral stones at our emergency department between August 2014 and September 2018 were included and underwent non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography 4 weeks from the first stone episode. Predictors of SSP were applied to build and validate the prediction model using multilayer perceptron (MLP) with the Keras framework. RESULTS: Of 833 patients, SSP was observed in 606 (72.7%). SSP rates were 68.2% and 75.6% for stone sizes 5–10 mm and <5 mm, respectively. Stone opacity, location, and whether it was the first ureteral stone episode were significant predictors of SSP. Areas under the curve (AUCs) for receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for MLP, and logistic regression were 0.859 and 0.847, respectively, for stones <5 mm, and 0.881 and 0.817, respectively, for 5–10 mm stones. CONCLUSION: SSP prediction models were developed in patients with well-controlled unilateral ureteral stones; the performance of the models was good, especially in identifying SSP for 5–10-mm ureteral stones without definite treatment guidelines. To further improve the performance of these models, future studies should focus on using machine learning techniques in image analysis. Public Library of Science 2021-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8635399/ /pubmed/34851999 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260517 Text en © 2021 Park et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Park, Jee Soo Kim, Dong Wook Lee, Dongu Lee, Taeju Koo, Kyo Chul Han, Woong Kyu Chung, Byung Ha Lee, Kwang Suk Development of prediction models of spontaneous ureteral stone passage through machine learning: Comparison with conventional statistical analysis |
title | Development of prediction models of spontaneous ureteral stone passage through machine learning: Comparison with conventional statistical analysis |
title_full | Development of prediction models of spontaneous ureteral stone passage through machine learning: Comparison with conventional statistical analysis |
title_fullStr | Development of prediction models of spontaneous ureteral stone passage through machine learning: Comparison with conventional statistical analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of prediction models of spontaneous ureteral stone passage through machine learning: Comparison with conventional statistical analysis |
title_short | Development of prediction models of spontaneous ureteral stone passage through machine learning: Comparison with conventional statistical analysis |
title_sort | development of prediction models of spontaneous ureteral stone passage through machine learning: comparison with conventional statistical analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8635399/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34851999 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260517 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parkjeesoo developmentofpredictionmodelsofspontaneousureteralstonepassagethroughmachinelearningcomparisonwithconventionalstatisticalanalysis AT kimdongwook developmentofpredictionmodelsofspontaneousureteralstonepassagethroughmachinelearningcomparisonwithconventionalstatisticalanalysis AT leedongu developmentofpredictionmodelsofspontaneousureteralstonepassagethroughmachinelearningcomparisonwithconventionalstatisticalanalysis AT leetaeju developmentofpredictionmodelsofspontaneousureteralstonepassagethroughmachinelearningcomparisonwithconventionalstatisticalanalysis AT kookyochul developmentofpredictionmodelsofspontaneousureteralstonepassagethroughmachinelearningcomparisonwithconventionalstatisticalanalysis AT hanwoongkyu developmentofpredictionmodelsofspontaneousureteralstonepassagethroughmachinelearningcomparisonwithconventionalstatisticalanalysis AT chungbyungha developmentofpredictionmodelsofspontaneousureteralstonepassagethroughmachinelearningcomparisonwithconventionalstatisticalanalysis AT leekwangsuk developmentofpredictionmodelsofspontaneousureteralstonepassagethroughmachinelearningcomparisonwithconventionalstatisticalanalysis |