Cargando…
Home Field Advantage: Assessing the Geographic Trends of the Plastic Surgery Residency Match during the COVID-19 Pandemic
OBJECTIVE: In previous plastic surgery residency match cycles, in-person activities at other institutions, such as away rotations, have facilitated matches outside of an applicant's home program or region. The COVID-19 pandemic, however, limited these in-person opportunities. Therefore, we hypo...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8635498/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34210645 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.06.002 |
_version_ | 1784608315168260096 |
---|---|
author | Asadourian, Paul A. Murphy, Alexander I. Marano, Andrew A. Rohde, Christine H. Wu, June K. |
author_facet | Asadourian, Paul A. Murphy, Alexander I. Marano, Andrew A. Rohde, Christine H. Wu, June K. |
author_sort | Asadourian, Paul A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: In previous plastic surgery residency match cycles, in-person activities at other institutions, such as away rotations, have facilitated matches outside of an applicant's home program or region. The COVID-19 pandemic, however, limited these in-person opportunities. Therefore, we hypothesized that applicants of the 2021 cycle would be more likely to match into programs with which they have existing geographic connections when compared to previous years. DESIGN: Residency websites and social media accounts were searched for resident names and educational information for those matching in 2021 and 2015 to 2020. Outcomes included proportion of applicants matching at the program affiliated with their medical school (“home program”), or matching in the same state or United States Census Map region as their medical school or undergraduate institution. Subgroup analyses were stratified by program region, incoming resident class size, and Doximity residency reputation ranking. SETTING: Columbia University (New York). PARTICIPANTS: For the 2015 to 2020 residency cycles, 963 residents were identified from 78 (95.1%) programs. For 2021, 159 incoming interns were identified from 70 (82.3%) programs. RESULTS: 2021 applicants matched into their home program at higher rates than 2015-2020 applicants (36.0% vs. 24.1%, p = 0.019). This trend was similar regardless of program region or size. This increase was significant for programs ranked outside of the top 30 (41.5% vs. 26.4%, p = 0.032), but not for the top 30 programs (32.1% vs. 22.3%, p = 0.128). Excluding those who matched at their home program, 2015 to 2020 and 2021 applicants matched in the same state or region of their medical school or undergraduate institution at similar rates (p > 0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: During the COVID-19 pandemic, plastic surgery residency programs matched more applicants from affiliated medical schools than in previous years. This may result from lack of in-person opportunities for applicants at other programs. Alternative relationship-building opportunities may facilitate broader geographic connections in the 2022 cycle. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8635498 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86354982021-12-02 Home Field Advantage: Assessing the Geographic Trends of the Plastic Surgery Residency Match during the COVID-19 Pandemic Asadourian, Paul A. Murphy, Alexander I. Marano, Andrew A. Rohde, Christine H. Wu, June K. J Surg Educ Original Reports OBJECTIVE: In previous plastic surgery residency match cycles, in-person activities at other institutions, such as away rotations, have facilitated matches outside of an applicant's home program or region. The COVID-19 pandemic, however, limited these in-person opportunities. Therefore, we hypothesized that applicants of the 2021 cycle would be more likely to match into programs with which they have existing geographic connections when compared to previous years. DESIGN: Residency websites and social media accounts were searched for resident names and educational information for those matching in 2021 and 2015 to 2020. Outcomes included proportion of applicants matching at the program affiliated with their medical school (“home program”), or matching in the same state or United States Census Map region as their medical school or undergraduate institution. Subgroup analyses were stratified by program region, incoming resident class size, and Doximity residency reputation ranking. SETTING: Columbia University (New York). PARTICIPANTS: For the 2015 to 2020 residency cycles, 963 residents were identified from 78 (95.1%) programs. For 2021, 159 incoming interns were identified from 70 (82.3%) programs. RESULTS: 2021 applicants matched into their home program at higher rates than 2015-2020 applicants (36.0% vs. 24.1%, p = 0.019). This trend was similar regardless of program region or size. This increase was significant for programs ranked outside of the top 30 (41.5% vs. 26.4%, p = 0.032), but not for the top 30 programs (32.1% vs. 22.3%, p = 0.128). Excluding those who matched at their home program, 2015 to 2020 and 2021 applicants matched in the same state or region of their medical school or undergraduate institution at similar rates (p > 0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: During the COVID-19 pandemic, plastic surgery residency programs matched more applicants from affiliated medical schools than in previous years. This may result from lack of in-person opportunities for applicants at other programs. Alternative relationship-building opportunities may facilitate broader geographic connections in the 2022 cycle. Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2021 2021-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8635498/ /pubmed/34210645 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.06.002 Text en © 2021 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Original Reports Asadourian, Paul A. Murphy, Alexander I. Marano, Andrew A. Rohde, Christine H. Wu, June K. Home Field Advantage: Assessing the Geographic Trends of the Plastic Surgery Residency Match during the COVID-19 Pandemic |
title | Home Field Advantage: Assessing the Geographic Trends of the Plastic Surgery Residency Match during the COVID-19 Pandemic |
title_full | Home Field Advantage: Assessing the Geographic Trends of the Plastic Surgery Residency Match during the COVID-19 Pandemic |
title_fullStr | Home Field Advantage: Assessing the Geographic Trends of the Plastic Surgery Residency Match during the COVID-19 Pandemic |
title_full_unstemmed | Home Field Advantage: Assessing the Geographic Trends of the Plastic Surgery Residency Match during the COVID-19 Pandemic |
title_short | Home Field Advantage: Assessing the Geographic Trends of the Plastic Surgery Residency Match during the COVID-19 Pandemic |
title_sort | home field advantage: assessing the geographic trends of the plastic surgery residency match during the covid-19 pandemic |
topic | Original Reports |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8635498/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34210645 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.06.002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT asadourianpaula homefieldadvantageassessingthegeographictrendsoftheplasticsurgeryresidencymatchduringthecovid19pandemic AT murphyalexanderi homefieldadvantageassessingthegeographictrendsoftheplasticsurgeryresidencymatchduringthecovid19pandemic AT maranoandrewa homefieldadvantageassessingthegeographictrendsoftheplasticsurgeryresidencymatchduringthecovid19pandemic AT rohdechristineh homefieldadvantageassessingthegeographictrendsoftheplasticsurgeryresidencymatchduringthecovid19pandemic AT wujunek homefieldadvantageassessingthegeographictrendsoftheplasticsurgeryresidencymatchduringthecovid19pandemic |