Cargando…
Assessment of Delivery Quality Assurance for Stereotactic Radiosurgery With Cyberknife
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to establish and assess a practical delivery quality assurance method for stereotactic radiosurgery with Cyberknife by analyzing the geometric and dosimetric accuracies obtained using a PTW31016 PinPoint ionization chamber and EBT3 films. Moreover, this study al...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8635503/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34868957 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.751922 |
_version_ | 1784608325813403648 |
---|---|
author | Li, Jun Zhang, Xile Pan, Yuxi Zhuang, Hongqing Wang, Junjie Yang, Ruijie |
author_facet | Li, Jun Zhang, Xile Pan, Yuxi Zhuang, Hongqing Wang, Junjie Yang, Ruijie |
author_sort | Li, Jun |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to establish and assess a practical delivery quality assurance method for stereotactic radiosurgery with Cyberknife by analyzing the geometric and dosimetric accuracies obtained using a PTW31016 PinPoint ionization chamber and EBT3 films. Moreover, this study also explores the relationship between the parameters of plan complexity, target volume, and deliverability parameters and provides a valuable reference for improving plan optimization and validation. METHODS: One hundred fifty cases of delivery quality assurance plans were performed on Cyberknife to assess point dose and planar dose distribution, respectively, using a PTW31016 PinPoint ionization chamber and Gafchromic EBT3 films. The measured chamber doses were compared with the planned mean doses in the sensitive volume of the chamber, and the measured planar doses were compared with the calculated dose distribution using gamma index analysis. The gamma passing rates were evaluated using the criteria of 3%/1 mm and 2%/2 mm. The statistical significance of the correlations between the complexity metrics, target volume, and the gamma passing rate were analyzed using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. RESULTS: For point dose comparison, the averaged dose differences (± standard deviations) were 1.6 ± 0.73% for all the cases. For planar dose distribution, the mean gamma passing rate for 3%/1 mm, and 2%/2 mm evaluation criteria were 94.26% ± 1.89%, and 93.86% ± 2.16%, respectively. The gamma passing rates were higher than 90% for all the delivery quality assurance plans with the criteria of 3%/1 mm and 2%/2 mm. The difference in point dose was lowly correlated with volume of PTV, number of beams, and treatment time for 150 DQA plans, and highly correlated with volume of PTV for 18 DQA plans of small target. DQA gamma passing rate (2%/2 mm) was a moderate significant correlation for the number of nodes, number of beams and treatment time, and a low correlation with MU. CONCLUSION: PTW31016 PinPoint ionization chamber and EBT3 film can be used for routine Cyberknife delivery quality assurance. The point dose difference should be within 3%. The gamma passing rate should be higher than 90% for the criteria of 3%/1 mm and 2%/2 mm. In addition, the plan complexity and PTV volume were found to have some influence on the plan deliverability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8635503 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86355032021-12-02 Assessment of Delivery Quality Assurance for Stereotactic Radiosurgery With Cyberknife Li, Jun Zhang, Xile Pan, Yuxi Zhuang, Hongqing Wang, Junjie Yang, Ruijie Front Oncol Oncology PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to establish and assess a practical delivery quality assurance method for stereotactic radiosurgery with Cyberknife by analyzing the geometric and dosimetric accuracies obtained using a PTW31016 PinPoint ionization chamber and EBT3 films. Moreover, this study also explores the relationship between the parameters of plan complexity, target volume, and deliverability parameters and provides a valuable reference for improving plan optimization and validation. METHODS: One hundred fifty cases of delivery quality assurance plans were performed on Cyberknife to assess point dose and planar dose distribution, respectively, using a PTW31016 PinPoint ionization chamber and Gafchromic EBT3 films. The measured chamber doses were compared with the planned mean doses in the sensitive volume of the chamber, and the measured planar doses were compared with the calculated dose distribution using gamma index analysis. The gamma passing rates were evaluated using the criteria of 3%/1 mm and 2%/2 mm. The statistical significance of the correlations between the complexity metrics, target volume, and the gamma passing rate were analyzed using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. RESULTS: For point dose comparison, the averaged dose differences (± standard deviations) were 1.6 ± 0.73% for all the cases. For planar dose distribution, the mean gamma passing rate for 3%/1 mm, and 2%/2 mm evaluation criteria were 94.26% ± 1.89%, and 93.86% ± 2.16%, respectively. The gamma passing rates were higher than 90% for all the delivery quality assurance plans with the criteria of 3%/1 mm and 2%/2 mm. The difference in point dose was lowly correlated with volume of PTV, number of beams, and treatment time for 150 DQA plans, and highly correlated with volume of PTV for 18 DQA plans of small target. DQA gamma passing rate (2%/2 mm) was a moderate significant correlation for the number of nodes, number of beams and treatment time, and a low correlation with MU. CONCLUSION: PTW31016 PinPoint ionization chamber and EBT3 film can be used for routine Cyberknife delivery quality assurance. The point dose difference should be within 3%. The gamma passing rate should be higher than 90% for the criteria of 3%/1 mm and 2%/2 mm. In addition, the plan complexity and PTV volume were found to have some influence on the plan deliverability. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8635503/ /pubmed/34868957 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.751922 Text en Copyright © 2021 Li, Zhang, Pan, Zhuang, Wang and Yang https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Li, Jun Zhang, Xile Pan, Yuxi Zhuang, Hongqing Wang, Junjie Yang, Ruijie Assessment of Delivery Quality Assurance for Stereotactic Radiosurgery With Cyberknife |
title | Assessment of Delivery Quality Assurance for Stereotactic Radiosurgery With Cyberknife |
title_full | Assessment of Delivery Quality Assurance for Stereotactic Radiosurgery With Cyberknife |
title_fullStr | Assessment of Delivery Quality Assurance for Stereotactic Radiosurgery With Cyberknife |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of Delivery Quality Assurance for Stereotactic Radiosurgery With Cyberknife |
title_short | Assessment of Delivery Quality Assurance for Stereotactic Radiosurgery With Cyberknife |
title_sort | assessment of delivery quality assurance for stereotactic radiosurgery with cyberknife |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8635503/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34868957 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.751922 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lijun assessmentofdeliveryqualityassuranceforstereotacticradiosurgerywithcyberknife AT zhangxile assessmentofdeliveryqualityassuranceforstereotacticradiosurgerywithcyberknife AT panyuxi assessmentofdeliveryqualityassuranceforstereotacticradiosurgerywithcyberknife AT zhuanghongqing assessmentofdeliveryqualityassuranceforstereotacticradiosurgerywithcyberknife AT wangjunjie assessmentofdeliveryqualityassuranceforstereotacticradiosurgerywithcyberknife AT yangruijie assessmentofdeliveryqualityassuranceforstereotacticradiosurgerywithcyberknife |