Cargando…

PSMA PET Imaging in Glioblastoma: A Preclinical Evaluation and Theranostic Outlook

BACKGROUND: Prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET imaging has recently gained attention in glioblastoma (GBM) patients as a potential theranostic target for PSMA radioligand therapy. However, PSMA PET has not yet been established in a murine GBM model. Our goal was to investigate the potenti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kirchner, Maximilian A., Holzgreve, Adrien, Brendel, Matthias, Orth, Michael, Ruf, Viktoria C., Steiger, Katja, Pötter, Dennis, Gold, Lukas, Unterrainer, Marcus, Mittlmeier, Lena M., Barci, Enio, Kälin, Roland E., Glass, Rainer, Lindner, Simon, Kaiser, Lena, Maas, Jessica, von Baumgarten, Louisa, Ilhan, Harun, Belka, Claus, Notni, Johannes, Bartenstein, Peter, Lauber, Kirsten, Albert, Nathalie L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8635528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34869017
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.774017
_version_ 1784608332164628480
author Kirchner, Maximilian A.
Holzgreve, Adrien
Brendel, Matthias
Orth, Michael
Ruf, Viktoria C.
Steiger, Katja
Pötter, Dennis
Gold, Lukas
Unterrainer, Marcus
Mittlmeier, Lena M.
Barci, Enio
Kälin, Roland E.
Glass, Rainer
Lindner, Simon
Kaiser, Lena
Maas, Jessica
von Baumgarten, Louisa
Ilhan, Harun
Belka, Claus
Notni, Johannes
Bartenstein, Peter
Lauber, Kirsten
Albert, Nathalie L.
author_facet Kirchner, Maximilian A.
Holzgreve, Adrien
Brendel, Matthias
Orth, Michael
Ruf, Viktoria C.
Steiger, Katja
Pötter, Dennis
Gold, Lukas
Unterrainer, Marcus
Mittlmeier, Lena M.
Barci, Enio
Kälin, Roland E.
Glass, Rainer
Lindner, Simon
Kaiser, Lena
Maas, Jessica
von Baumgarten, Louisa
Ilhan, Harun
Belka, Claus
Notni, Johannes
Bartenstein, Peter
Lauber, Kirsten
Albert, Nathalie L.
author_sort Kirchner, Maximilian A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET imaging has recently gained attention in glioblastoma (GBM) patients as a potential theranostic target for PSMA radioligand therapy. However, PSMA PET has not yet been established in a murine GBM model. Our goal was to investigate the potential of PSMA PET imaging in the syngeneic GL261 GBM model and to give an outlook regarding the potential of PMSA radioligand therapy in this model. METHODS: We performed an (18)F-PSMA-1007 PET study in the orthotopic GL261 model (n=14 GBM, n=7 sham-operated mice) with imaging at day 4, 8, 11, 15, 18 and 22 post implantation. Time-activity-curves (TAC) were extracted from dynamic PET scans (0-120 min p. i.) in a subset of mice (n=4 GBM, n=3 sham-operated mice) to identify the optimal time frame for image analysis, and standardized-uptake-values (SUV) as well as tumor-to-background ratios (TBR) using contralateral normal brain as background were calculated in all mice. Additionally, computed tomography (CT), ex vivo and in vitro (18)F-PSMA-1007 autoradiographies (ARG) were performed. RESULTS: TAC analysis of GBM mice revealed a plateau of TBR values after 40 min p. i. Therefore, a 30 min time frame between 40-70 min p. i. was chosen for PET quantification. At day 15 and later, GBM mice showed a discernible PSMA PET signal on the inoculation site, with highest TBR(mean) in GBM mice at day 18 (7.3 ± 1.3 vs. 1.6 ± 0.3 in shams; p=0.024). Ex vivo ARG confirmed high tracer signal in GBM compared to healthy background (TBR(mean) 26.9 ± 10.5 vs. 1.6 ± 0.7 in shams at day 18/22 post implantation; p=0.002). However, absolute uptake values in the GL261 tumor remained low (e.g., SUV(mean) 0.21 ± 0.04 g/ml at day 18) resulting in low ratios compared to dose-relevant organs (e.g., mean tumor-to-kidney ratio 1.5E(-2) ± 0.5E(-2)). CONCLUSIONS: Although (18)F-PSMA-1007 PET imaging of GL261 tumor-bearing mice is feasible and resulted in high TBRs, absolute tumoral uptake values remained low and hint to limited applicability of the GL261 model for PSMA-directed therapy studies. Further investigations are warranted to identify suitable models for preclinical evaluation of PSMA-targeted theranostic approaches in GBM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8635528
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86355282021-12-02 PSMA PET Imaging in Glioblastoma: A Preclinical Evaluation and Theranostic Outlook Kirchner, Maximilian A. Holzgreve, Adrien Brendel, Matthias Orth, Michael Ruf, Viktoria C. Steiger, Katja Pötter, Dennis Gold, Lukas Unterrainer, Marcus Mittlmeier, Lena M. Barci, Enio Kälin, Roland E. Glass, Rainer Lindner, Simon Kaiser, Lena Maas, Jessica von Baumgarten, Louisa Ilhan, Harun Belka, Claus Notni, Johannes Bartenstein, Peter Lauber, Kirsten Albert, Nathalie L. Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: Prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET imaging has recently gained attention in glioblastoma (GBM) patients as a potential theranostic target for PSMA radioligand therapy. However, PSMA PET has not yet been established in a murine GBM model. Our goal was to investigate the potential of PSMA PET imaging in the syngeneic GL261 GBM model and to give an outlook regarding the potential of PMSA radioligand therapy in this model. METHODS: We performed an (18)F-PSMA-1007 PET study in the orthotopic GL261 model (n=14 GBM, n=7 sham-operated mice) with imaging at day 4, 8, 11, 15, 18 and 22 post implantation. Time-activity-curves (TAC) were extracted from dynamic PET scans (0-120 min p. i.) in a subset of mice (n=4 GBM, n=3 sham-operated mice) to identify the optimal time frame for image analysis, and standardized-uptake-values (SUV) as well as tumor-to-background ratios (TBR) using contralateral normal brain as background were calculated in all mice. Additionally, computed tomography (CT), ex vivo and in vitro (18)F-PSMA-1007 autoradiographies (ARG) were performed. RESULTS: TAC analysis of GBM mice revealed a plateau of TBR values after 40 min p. i. Therefore, a 30 min time frame between 40-70 min p. i. was chosen for PET quantification. At day 15 and later, GBM mice showed a discernible PSMA PET signal on the inoculation site, with highest TBR(mean) in GBM mice at day 18 (7.3 ± 1.3 vs. 1.6 ± 0.3 in shams; p=0.024). Ex vivo ARG confirmed high tracer signal in GBM compared to healthy background (TBR(mean) 26.9 ± 10.5 vs. 1.6 ± 0.7 in shams at day 18/22 post implantation; p=0.002). However, absolute uptake values in the GL261 tumor remained low (e.g., SUV(mean) 0.21 ± 0.04 g/ml at day 18) resulting in low ratios compared to dose-relevant organs (e.g., mean tumor-to-kidney ratio 1.5E(-2) ± 0.5E(-2)). CONCLUSIONS: Although (18)F-PSMA-1007 PET imaging of GL261 tumor-bearing mice is feasible and resulted in high TBRs, absolute tumoral uptake values remained low and hint to limited applicability of the GL261 model for PSMA-directed therapy studies. Further investigations are warranted to identify suitable models for preclinical evaluation of PSMA-targeted theranostic approaches in GBM. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8635528/ /pubmed/34869017 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.774017 Text en Copyright © 2021 Kirchner, Holzgreve, Brendel, Orth, Ruf, Steiger, Pötter, Gold, Unterrainer, Mittlmeier, Barci, Kälin, Glass, Lindner, Kaiser, Maas, von Baumgarten, Ilhan, Belka, Notni, Bartenstein, Lauber and Albert https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Kirchner, Maximilian A.
Holzgreve, Adrien
Brendel, Matthias
Orth, Michael
Ruf, Viktoria C.
Steiger, Katja
Pötter, Dennis
Gold, Lukas
Unterrainer, Marcus
Mittlmeier, Lena M.
Barci, Enio
Kälin, Roland E.
Glass, Rainer
Lindner, Simon
Kaiser, Lena
Maas, Jessica
von Baumgarten, Louisa
Ilhan, Harun
Belka, Claus
Notni, Johannes
Bartenstein, Peter
Lauber, Kirsten
Albert, Nathalie L.
PSMA PET Imaging in Glioblastoma: A Preclinical Evaluation and Theranostic Outlook
title PSMA PET Imaging in Glioblastoma: A Preclinical Evaluation and Theranostic Outlook
title_full PSMA PET Imaging in Glioblastoma: A Preclinical Evaluation and Theranostic Outlook
title_fullStr PSMA PET Imaging in Glioblastoma: A Preclinical Evaluation and Theranostic Outlook
title_full_unstemmed PSMA PET Imaging in Glioblastoma: A Preclinical Evaluation and Theranostic Outlook
title_short PSMA PET Imaging in Glioblastoma: A Preclinical Evaluation and Theranostic Outlook
title_sort psma pet imaging in glioblastoma: a preclinical evaluation and theranostic outlook
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8635528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34869017
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.774017
work_keys_str_mv AT kirchnermaximiliana psmapetimaginginglioblastomaapreclinicalevaluationandtheranosticoutlook
AT holzgreveadrien psmapetimaginginglioblastomaapreclinicalevaluationandtheranosticoutlook
AT brendelmatthias psmapetimaginginglioblastomaapreclinicalevaluationandtheranosticoutlook
AT orthmichael psmapetimaginginglioblastomaapreclinicalevaluationandtheranosticoutlook
AT rufviktoriac psmapetimaginginglioblastomaapreclinicalevaluationandtheranosticoutlook
AT steigerkatja psmapetimaginginglioblastomaapreclinicalevaluationandtheranosticoutlook
AT potterdennis psmapetimaginginglioblastomaapreclinicalevaluationandtheranosticoutlook
AT goldlukas psmapetimaginginglioblastomaapreclinicalevaluationandtheranosticoutlook
AT unterrainermarcus psmapetimaginginglioblastomaapreclinicalevaluationandtheranosticoutlook
AT mittlmeierlenam psmapetimaginginglioblastomaapreclinicalevaluationandtheranosticoutlook
AT barcienio psmapetimaginginglioblastomaapreclinicalevaluationandtheranosticoutlook
AT kalinrolande psmapetimaginginglioblastomaapreclinicalevaluationandtheranosticoutlook
AT glassrainer psmapetimaginginglioblastomaapreclinicalevaluationandtheranosticoutlook
AT lindnersimon psmapetimaginginglioblastomaapreclinicalevaluationandtheranosticoutlook
AT kaiserlena psmapetimaginginglioblastomaapreclinicalevaluationandtheranosticoutlook
AT maasjessica psmapetimaginginglioblastomaapreclinicalevaluationandtheranosticoutlook
AT vonbaumgartenlouisa psmapetimaginginglioblastomaapreclinicalevaluationandtheranosticoutlook
AT ilhanharun psmapetimaginginglioblastomaapreclinicalevaluationandtheranosticoutlook
AT belkaclaus psmapetimaginginglioblastomaapreclinicalevaluationandtheranosticoutlook
AT notnijohannes psmapetimaginginglioblastomaapreclinicalevaluationandtheranosticoutlook
AT bartensteinpeter psmapetimaginginglioblastomaapreclinicalevaluationandtheranosticoutlook
AT lauberkirsten psmapetimaginginglioblastomaapreclinicalevaluationandtheranosticoutlook
AT albertnathaliel psmapetimaginginglioblastomaapreclinicalevaluationandtheranosticoutlook