Cargando…
PSMA PET Imaging in Glioblastoma: A Preclinical Evaluation and Theranostic Outlook
BACKGROUND: Prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET imaging has recently gained attention in glioblastoma (GBM) patients as a potential theranostic target for PSMA radioligand therapy. However, PSMA PET has not yet been established in a murine GBM model. Our goal was to investigate the potenti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8635528/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34869017 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.774017 |
_version_ | 1784608332164628480 |
---|---|
author | Kirchner, Maximilian A. Holzgreve, Adrien Brendel, Matthias Orth, Michael Ruf, Viktoria C. Steiger, Katja Pötter, Dennis Gold, Lukas Unterrainer, Marcus Mittlmeier, Lena M. Barci, Enio Kälin, Roland E. Glass, Rainer Lindner, Simon Kaiser, Lena Maas, Jessica von Baumgarten, Louisa Ilhan, Harun Belka, Claus Notni, Johannes Bartenstein, Peter Lauber, Kirsten Albert, Nathalie L. |
author_facet | Kirchner, Maximilian A. Holzgreve, Adrien Brendel, Matthias Orth, Michael Ruf, Viktoria C. Steiger, Katja Pötter, Dennis Gold, Lukas Unterrainer, Marcus Mittlmeier, Lena M. Barci, Enio Kälin, Roland E. Glass, Rainer Lindner, Simon Kaiser, Lena Maas, Jessica von Baumgarten, Louisa Ilhan, Harun Belka, Claus Notni, Johannes Bartenstein, Peter Lauber, Kirsten Albert, Nathalie L. |
author_sort | Kirchner, Maximilian A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET imaging has recently gained attention in glioblastoma (GBM) patients as a potential theranostic target for PSMA radioligand therapy. However, PSMA PET has not yet been established in a murine GBM model. Our goal was to investigate the potential of PSMA PET imaging in the syngeneic GL261 GBM model and to give an outlook regarding the potential of PMSA radioligand therapy in this model. METHODS: We performed an (18)F-PSMA-1007 PET study in the orthotopic GL261 model (n=14 GBM, n=7 sham-operated mice) with imaging at day 4, 8, 11, 15, 18 and 22 post implantation. Time-activity-curves (TAC) were extracted from dynamic PET scans (0-120 min p. i.) in a subset of mice (n=4 GBM, n=3 sham-operated mice) to identify the optimal time frame for image analysis, and standardized-uptake-values (SUV) as well as tumor-to-background ratios (TBR) using contralateral normal brain as background were calculated in all mice. Additionally, computed tomography (CT), ex vivo and in vitro (18)F-PSMA-1007 autoradiographies (ARG) were performed. RESULTS: TAC analysis of GBM mice revealed a plateau of TBR values after 40 min p. i. Therefore, a 30 min time frame between 40-70 min p. i. was chosen for PET quantification. At day 15 and later, GBM mice showed a discernible PSMA PET signal on the inoculation site, with highest TBR(mean) in GBM mice at day 18 (7.3 ± 1.3 vs. 1.6 ± 0.3 in shams; p=0.024). Ex vivo ARG confirmed high tracer signal in GBM compared to healthy background (TBR(mean) 26.9 ± 10.5 vs. 1.6 ± 0.7 in shams at day 18/22 post implantation; p=0.002). However, absolute uptake values in the GL261 tumor remained low (e.g., SUV(mean) 0.21 ± 0.04 g/ml at day 18) resulting in low ratios compared to dose-relevant organs (e.g., mean tumor-to-kidney ratio 1.5E(-2) ± 0.5E(-2)). CONCLUSIONS: Although (18)F-PSMA-1007 PET imaging of GL261 tumor-bearing mice is feasible and resulted in high TBRs, absolute tumoral uptake values remained low and hint to limited applicability of the GL261 model for PSMA-directed therapy studies. Further investigations are warranted to identify suitable models for preclinical evaluation of PSMA-targeted theranostic approaches in GBM. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8635528 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86355282021-12-02 PSMA PET Imaging in Glioblastoma: A Preclinical Evaluation and Theranostic Outlook Kirchner, Maximilian A. Holzgreve, Adrien Brendel, Matthias Orth, Michael Ruf, Viktoria C. Steiger, Katja Pötter, Dennis Gold, Lukas Unterrainer, Marcus Mittlmeier, Lena M. Barci, Enio Kälin, Roland E. Glass, Rainer Lindner, Simon Kaiser, Lena Maas, Jessica von Baumgarten, Louisa Ilhan, Harun Belka, Claus Notni, Johannes Bartenstein, Peter Lauber, Kirsten Albert, Nathalie L. Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: Prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET imaging has recently gained attention in glioblastoma (GBM) patients as a potential theranostic target for PSMA radioligand therapy. However, PSMA PET has not yet been established in a murine GBM model. Our goal was to investigate the potential of PSMA PET imaging in the syngeneic GL261 GBM model and to give an outlook regarding the potential of PMSA radioligand therapy in this model. METHODS: We performed an (18)F-PSMA-1007 PET study in the orthotopic GL261 model (n=14 GBM, n=7 sham-operated mice) with imaging at day 4, 8, 11, 15, 18 and 22 post implantation. Time-activity-curves (TAC) were extracted from dynamic PET scans (0-120 min p. i.) in a subset of mice (n=4 GBM, n=3 sham-operated mice) to identify the optimal time frame for image analysis, and standardized-uptake-values (SUV) as well as tumor-to-background ratios (TBR) using contralateral normal brain as background were calculated in all mice. Additionally, computed tomography (CT), ex vivo and in vitro (18)F-PSMA-1007 autoradiographies (ARG) were performed. RESULTS: TAC analysis of GBM mice revealed a plateau of TBR values after 40 min p. i. Therefore, a 30 min time frame between 40-70 min p. i. was chosen for PET quantification. At day 15 and later, GBM mice showed a discernible PSMA PET signal on the inoculation site, with highest TBR(mean) in GBM mice at day 18 (7.3 ± 1.3 vs. 1.6 ± 0.3 in shams; p=0.024). Ex vivo ARG confirmed high tracer signal in GBM compared to healthy background (TBR(mean) 26.9 ± 10.5 vs. 1.6 ± 0.7 in shams at day 18/22 post implantation; p=0.002). However, absolute uptake values in the GL261 tumor remained low (e.g., SUV(mean) 0.21 ± 0.04 g/ml at day 18) resulting in low ratios compared to dose-relevant organs (e.g., mean tumor-to-kidney ratio 1.5E(-2) ± 0.5E(-2)). CONCLUSIONS: Although (18)F-PSMA-1007 PET imaging of GL261 tumor-bearing mice is feasible and resulted in high TBRs, absolute tumoral uptake values remained low and hint to limited applicability of the GL261 model for PSMA-directed therapy studies. Further investigations are warranted to identify suitable models for preclinical evaluation of PSMA-targeted theranostic approaches in GBM. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8635528/ /pubmed/34869017 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.774017 Text en Copyright © 2021 Kirchner, Holzgreve, Brendel, Orth, Ruf, Steiger, Pötter, Gold, Unterrainer, Mittlmeier, Barci, Kälin, Glass, Lindner, Kaiser, Maas, von Baumgarten, Ilhan, Belka, Notni, Bartenstein, Lauber and Albert https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Kirchner, Maximilian A. Holzgreve, Adrien Brendel, Matthias Orth, Michael Ruf, Viktoria C. Steiger, Katja Pötter, Dennis Gold, Lukas Unterrainer, Marcus Mittlmeier, Lena M. Barci, Enio Kälin, Roland E. Glass, Rainer Lindner, Simon Kaiser, Lena Maas, Jessica von Baumgarten, Louisa Ilhan, Harun Belka, Claus Notni, Johannes Bartenstein, Peter Lauber, Kirsten Albert, Nathalie L. PSMA PET Imaging in Glioblastoma: A Preclinical Evaluation and Theranostic Outlook |
title | PSMA PET Imaging in Glioblastoma: A Preclinical Evaluation and Theranostic Outlook |
title_full | PSMA PET Imaging in Glioblastoma: A Preclinical Evaluation and Theranostic Outlook |
title_fullStr | PSMA PET Imaging in Glioblastoma: A Preclinical Evaluation and Theranostic Outlook |
title_full_unstemmed | PSMA PET Imaging in Glioblastoma: A Preclinical Evaluation and Theranostic Outlook |
title_short | PSMA PET Imaging in Glioblastoma: A Preclinical Evaluation and Theranostic Outlook |
title_sort | psma pet imaging in glioblastoma: a preclinical evaluation and theranostic outlook |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8635528/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34869017 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.774017 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kirchnermaximiliana psmapetimaginginglioblastomaapreclinicalevaluationandtheranosticoutlook AT holzgreveadrien psmapetimaginginglioblastomaapreclinicalevaluationandtheranosticoutlook AT brendelmatthias psmapetimaginginglioblastomaapreclinicalevaluationandtheranosticoutlook AT orthmichael psmapetimaginginglioblastomaapreclinicalevaluationandtheranosticoutlook AT rufviktoriac psmapetimaginginglioblastomaapreclinicalevaluationandtheranosticoutlook AT steigerkatja psmapetimaginginglioblastomaapreclinicalevaluationandtheranosticoutlook AT potterdennis psmapetimaginginglioblastomaapreclinicalevaluationandtheranosticoutlook AT goldlukas psmapetimaginginglioblastomaapreclinicalevaluationandtheranosticoutlook AT unterrainermarcus psmapetimaginginglioblastomaapreclinicalevaluationandtheranosticoutlook AT mittlmeierlenam psmapetimaginginglioblastomaapreclinicalevaluationandtheranosticoutlook AT barcienio psmapetimaginginglioblastomaapreclinicalevaluationandtheranosticoutlook AT kalinrolande psmapetimaginginglioblastomaapreclinicalevaluationandtheranosticoutlook AT glassrainer psmapetimaginginglioblastomaapreclinicalevaluationandtheranosticoutlook AT lindnersimon psmapetimaginginglioblastomaapreclinicalevaluationandtheranosticoutlook AT kaiserlena psmapetimaginginglioblastomaapreclinicalevaluationandtheranosticoutlook AT maasjessica psmapetimaginginglioblastomaapreclinicalevaluationandtheranosticoutlook AT vonbaumgartenlouisa psmapetimaginginglioblastomaapreclinicalevaluationandtheranosticoutlook AT ilhanharun psmapetimaginginglioblastomaapreclinicalevaluationandtheranosticoutlook AT belkaclaus psmapetimaginginglioblastomaapreclinicalevaluationandtheranosticoutlook AT notnijohannes psmapetimaginginglioblastomaapreclinicalevaluationandtheranosticoutlook AT bartensteinpeter psmapetimaginginglioblastomaapreclinicalevaluationandtheranosticoutlook AT lauberkirsten psmapetimaginginglioblastomaapreclinicalevaluationandtheranosticoutlook AT albertnathaliel psmapetimaginginglioblastomaapreclinicalevaluationandtheranosticoutlook |