Cargando…

Understanding the psychological impacts of responding to a terrorist incident

Background: Responding to a mass casualty event can cause significant distress, even for highly trained medical and emergency services personnel. Objective: The purpose of the study was to understand more about first responders’ perspectives about their participation in major incident responses, spe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Skryabina, Elena A., Betts, Naomi, Amlôt, Richard, Reedy, Gabriel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8635676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34868476
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2021.1959116
_version_ 1784608375592452096
author Skryabina, Elena A.
Betts, Naomi
Amlôt, Richard
Reedy, Gabriel
author_facet Skryabina, Elena A.
Betts, Naomi
Amlôt, Richard
Reedy, Gabriel
author_sort Skryabina, Elena A.
collection PubMed
description Background: Responding to a mass casualty event can cause significant distress, even for highly trained medical and emergency services personnel. Objective: The purpose of the study was to understand more about first responders’ perspectives about their participation in major incident responses, specifically how and which individual and system factors contributed to their preparedness or may have enabled or hindered their response. The aim of the work was to improve preparedness and response for future incidents. Methods: This study reports a detailed analysis of qualitative interview data from frontline staff who responded to a large mass casualty terrorist incident in the UK in 2017. Data highlighted the psychological distress caused by responding to terrorist events and thus became the focus of further, detailed analysis. Results: Participants (n = 21) articulated in their own words the psychological distress experienced by many of the first responders to the event. Participants reported that they were not prepared to deal with psychological impact associated with this mass casualty terrorist incident and their role in the response, and that follow-up support was inconsistent. Multiple factors were identified as potentially increasing psychological distress. Social support provided by peers and organizational debriefs were identified as two most common support mechanisms. Organizational support was identified as inconsistent. Conclusions: This research contributes to the literature the voices of first responders to UK terrorist incidents, building on existing findings while further contributing unique contextual perspectives. This research reinforces the importance of psychosocial support for those who respond to these tragic incidents, and offers a number of recommendations for organizational preparedness for future events. Abbreviations: A&E: Accident and Emergency; EPRR: Emergency Preparedness, Resilience and Response; ERD: Emergency Response Department; HEPE: Health Emergency Preparedness Exercise; PHE: Public Health England; PHE REGG: Public Health England Research Ethics and Governance Group; MCI: Mass Casualty Incident; NHS: National Health Service
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8635676
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86356762021-12-02 Understanding the psychological impacts of responding to a terrorist incident Skryabina, Elena A. Betts, Naomi Amlôt, Richard Reedy, Gabriel Eur J Psychotraumatol Clinical Research Article Background: Responding to a mass casualty event can cause significant distress, even for highly trained medical and emergency services personnel. Objective: The purpose of the study was to understand more about first responders’ perspectives about their participation in major incident responses, specifically how and which individual and system factors contributed to their preparedness or may have enabled or hindered their response. The aim of the work was to improve preparedness and response for future incidents. Methods: This study reports a detailed analysis of qualitative interview data from frontline staff who responded to a large mass casualty terrorist incident in the UK in 2017. Data highlighted the psychological distress caused by responding to terrorist events and thus became the focus of further, detailed analysis. Results: Participants (n = 21) articulated in their own words the psychological distress experienced by many of the first responders to the event. Participants reported that they were not prepared to deal with psychological impact associated with this mass casualty terrorist incident and their role in the response, and that follow-up support was inconsistent. Multiple factors were identified as potentially increasing psychological distress. Social support provided by peers and organizational debriefs were identified as two most common support mechanisms. Organizational support was identified as inconsistent. Conclusions: This research contributes to the literature the voices of first responders to UK terrorist incidents, building on existing findings while further contributing unique contextual perspectives. This research reinforces the importance of psychosocial support for those who respond to these tragic incidents, and offers a number of recommendations for organizational preparedness for future events. Abbreviations: A&E: Accident and Emergency; EPRR: Emergency Preparedness, Resilience and Response; ERD: Emergency Response Department; HEPE: Health Emergency Preparedness Exercise; PHE: Public Health England; PHE REGG: Public Health England Research Ethics and Governance Group; MCI: Mass Casualty Incident; NHS: National Health Service Taylor & Francis 2021-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8635676/ /pubmed/34868476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2021.1959116 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Research Article
Skryabina, Elena A.
Betts, Naomi
Amlôt, Richard
Reedy, Gabriel
Understanding the psychological impacts of responding to a terrorist incident
title Understanding the psychological impacts of responding to a terrorist incident
title_full Understanding the psychological impacts of responding to a terrorist incident
title_fullStr Understanding the psychological impacts of responding to a terrorist incident
title_full_unstemmed Understanding the psychological impacts of responding to a terrorist incident
title_short Understanding the psychological impacts of responding to a terrorist incident
title_sort understanding the psychological impacts of responding to a terrorist incident
topic Clinical Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8635676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34868476
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2021.1959116
work_keys_str_mv AT skryabinaelenaa understandingthepsychologicalimpactsofrespondingtoaterroristincident
AT bettsnaomi understandingthepsychologicalimpactsofrespondingtoaterroristincident
AT amlotrichard understandingthepsychologicalimpactsofrespondingtoaterroristincident
AT reedygabriel understandingthepsychologicalimpactsofrespondingtoaterroristincident