Cargando…
Trends in Non-invasive Prenatal Screening and Invasive Testing in Denmark (2000–2019) and Israel (2011–2019)
Introduction: Following the wide distribution of non-invasive prenatal genetic screening (NIPS), numerous studies have reported a decline in total invasive tests in the recent years, up to 50–70% in some countries. However, in Denmark and Israel we have not experienced these declines. The objective...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8635699/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34869484 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.768997 |
_version_ | 1784608381001007104 |
---|---|
author | Sagi-Dain, Lena Singer, Amihood Petersen, Olav B. Lou, Stina Vogel, Ida |
author_facet | Sagi-Dain, Lena Singer, Amihood Petersen, Olav B. Lou, Stina Vogel, Ida |
author_sort | Sagi-Dain, Lena |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: Following the wide distribution of non-invasive prenatal genetic screening (NIPS), numerous studies have reported a decline in total invasive tests in the recent years, up to 50–70% in some countries. However, in Denmark and Israel we have not experienced these declines. The objective of our study was to evaluate the trends in NIPS and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) use in Denmark and Israel. Methods: This retrospective study was performed by data acquisition from the Danish Cytogenetics Central Registry throughout the years 2000–2019, and Israeli Public Health Services, Ministry of Health computerized database (from 2011). Results: Of the 1,243,956 live births registered in Denmark over the years 2000–2019, a relatively steady level of invasive testing around 6% was noted since 2004, as opposed to 13.0% in Israel based on 1,594,962 live births between 2011 and 2019. The average uptake of NIPS was 1.1 ± 0.5% in Denmark vs. 4.3% in Israel (2013–2019). Relatively steady rates of invasive testing were noted in both countries, compared to a slight decline in NIPS in the recent years. Discussion: The recent decrease in the rates of invasive testing in the NIPS era was not observed in Denmark or in Israel. These results imply that Danish and Israeli women and/or health providers might favor the high resolution and yield of CMA testing over the non-invasiveness of NIPS. We explore and discuss this phenomenon, based on five central factors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8635699 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86356992021-12-02 Trends in Non-invasive Prenatal Screening and Invasive Testing in Denmark (2000–2019) and Israel (2011–2019) Sagi-Dain, Lena Singer, Amihood Petersen, Olav B. Lou, Stina Vogel, Ida Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine Introduction: Following the wide distribution of non-invasive prenatal genetic screening (NIPS), numerous studies have reported a decline in total invasive tests in the recent years, up to 50–70% in some countries. However, in Denmark and Israel we have not experienced these declines. The objective of our study was to evaluate the trends in NIPS and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) use in Denmark and Israel. Methods: This retrospective study was performed by data acquisition from the Danish Cytogenetics Central Registry throughout the years 2000–2019, and Israeli Public Health Services, Ministry of Health computerized database (from 2011). Results: Of the 1,243,956 live births registered in Denmark over the years 2000–2019, a relatively steady level of invasive testing around 6% was noted since 2004, as opposed to 13.0% in Israel based on 1,594,962 live births between 2011 and 2019. The average uptake of NIPS was 1.1 ± 0.5% in Denmark vs. 4.3% in Israel (2013–2019). Relatively steady rates of invasive testing were noted in both countries, compared to a slight decline in NIPS in the recent years. Discussion: The recent decrease in the rates of invasive testing in the NIPS era was not observed in Denmark or in Israel. These results imply that Danish and Israeli women and/or health providers might favor the high resolution and yield of CMA testing over the non-invasiveness of NIPS. We explore and discuss this phenomenon, based on five central factors. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8635699/ /pubmed/34869484 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.768997 Text en Copyright © 2021 Sagi-Dain, Singer, Petersen, Lou and Vogel. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Medicine Sagi-Dain, Lena Singer, Amihood Petersen, Olav B. Lou, Stina Vogel, Ida Trends in Non-invasive Prenatal Screening and Invasive Testing in Denmark (2000–2019) and Israel (2011–2019) |
title | Trends in Non-invasive Prenatal Screening and Invasive Testing in Denmark (2000–2019) and Israel (2011–2019) |
title_full | Trends in Non-invasive Prenatal Screening and Invasive Testing in Denmark (2000–2019) and Israel (2011–2019) |
title_fullStr | Trends in Non-invasive Prenatal Screening and Invasive Testing in Denmark (2000–2019) and Israel (2011–2019) |
title_full_unstemmed | Trends in Non-invasive Prenatal Screening and Invasive Testing in Denmark (2000–2019) and Israel (2011–2019) |
title_short | Trends in Non-invasive Prenatal Screening and Invasive Testing in Denmark (2000–2019) and Israel (2011–2019) |
title_sort | trends in non-invasive prenatal screening and invasive testing in denmark (2000–2019) and israel (2011–2019) |
topic | Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8635699/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34869484 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.768997 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sagidainlena trendsinnoninvasiveprenatalscreeningandinvasivetestingindenmark20002019andisrael20112019 AT singeramihood trendsinnoninvasiveprenatalscreeningandinvasivetestingindenmark20002019andisrael20112019 AT petersenolavb trendsinnoninvasiveprenatalscreeningandinvasivetestingindenmark20002019andisrael20112019 AT loustina trendsinnoninvasiveprenatalscreeningandinvasivetestingindenmark20002019andisrael20112019 AT vogelida trendsinnoninvasiveprenatalscreeningandinvasivetestingindenmark20002019andisrael20112019 |