Cargando…

Trends in Non-invasive Prenatal Screening and Invasive Testing in Denmark (2000–2019) and Israel (2011–2019)

Introduction: Following the wide distribution of non-invasive prenatal genetic screening (NIPS), numerous studies have reported a decline in total invasive tests in the recent years, up to 50–70% in some countries. However, in Denmark and Israel we have not experienced these declines. The objective...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sagi-Dain, Lena, Singer, Amihood, Petersen, Olav B., Lou, Stina, Vogel, Ida
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8635699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34869484
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.768997
_version_ 1784608381001007104
author Sagi-Dain, Lena
Singer, Amihood
Petersen, Olav B.
Lou, Stina
Vogel, Ida
author_facet Sagi-Dain, Lena
Singer, Amihood
Petersen, Olav B.
Lou, Stina
Vogel, Ida
author_sort Sagi-Dain, Lena
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Following the wide distribution of non-invasive prenatal genetic screening (NIPS), numerous studies have reported a decline in total invasive tests in the recent years, up to 50–70% in some countries. However, in Denmark and Israel we have not experienced these declines. The objective of our study was to evaluate the trends in NIPS and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) use in Denmark and Israel. Methods: This retrospective study was performed by data acquisition from the Danish Cytogenetics Central Registry throughout the years 2000–2019, and Israeli Public Health Services, Ministry of Health computerized database (from 2011). Results: Of the 1,243,956 live births registered in Denmark over the years 2000–2019, a relatively steady level of invasive testing around 6% was noted since 2004, as opposed to 13.0% in Israel based on 1,594,962 live births between 2011 and 2019. The average uptake of NIPS was 1.1 ± 0.5% in Denmark vs. 4.3% in Israel (2013–2019). Relatively steady rates of invasive testing were noted in both countries, compared to a slight decline in NIPS in the recent years. Discussion: The recent decrease in the rates of invasive testing in the NIPS era was not observed in Denmark or in Israel. These results imply that Danish and Israeli women and/or health providers might favor the high resolution and yield of CMA testing over the non-invasiveness of NIPS. We explore and discuss this phenomenon, based on five central factors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8635699
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86356992021-12-02 Trends in Non-invasive Prenatal Screening and Invasive Testing in Denmark (2000–2019) and Israel (2011–2019) Sagi-Dain, Lena Singer, Amihood Petersen, Olav B. Lou, Stina Vogel, Ida Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine Introduction: Following the wide distribution of non-invasive prenatal genetic screening (NIPS), numerous studies have reported a decline in total invasive tests in the recent years, up to 50–70% in some countries. However, in Denmark and Israel we have not experienced these declines. The objective of our study was to evaluate the trends in NIPS and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) use in Denmark and Israel. Methods: This retrospective study was performed by data acquisition from the Danish Cytogenetics Central Registry throughout the years 2000–2019, and Israeli Public Health Services, Ministry of Health computerized database (from 2011). Results: Of the 1,243,956 live births registered in Denmark over the years 2000–2019, a relatively steady level of invasive testing around 6% was noted since 2004, as opposed to 13.0% in Israel based on 1,594,962 live births between 2011 and 2019. The average uptake of NIPS was 1.1 ± 0.5% in Denmark vs. 4.3% in Israel (2013–2019). Relatively steady rates of invasive testing were noted in both countries, compared to a slight decline in NIPS in the recent years. Discussion: The recent decrease in the rates of invasive testing in the NIPS era was not observed in Denmark or in Israel. These results imply that Danish and Israeli women and/or health providers might favor the high resolution and yield of CMA testing over the non-invasiveness of NIPS. We explore and discuss this phenomenon, based on five central factors. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8635699/ /pubmed/34869484 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.768997 Text en Copyright © 2021 Sagi-Dain, Singer, Petersen, Lou and Vogel. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Sagi-Dain, Lena
Singer, Amihood
Petersen, Olav B.
Lou, Stina
Vogel, Ida
Trends in Non-invasive Prenatal Screening and Invasive Testing in Denmark (2000–2019) and Israel (2011–2019)
title Trends in Non-invasive Prenatal Screening and Invasive Testing in Denmark (2000–2019) and Israel (2011–2019)
title_full Trends in Non-invasive Prenatal Screening and Invasive Testing in Denmark (2000–2019) and Israel (2011–2019)
title_fullStr Trends in Non-invasive Prenatal Screening and Invasive Testing in Denmark (2000–2019) and Israel (2011–2019)
title_full_unstemmed Trends in Non-invasive Prenatal Screening and Invasive Testing in Denmark (2000–2019) and Israel (2011–2019)
title_short Trends in Non-invasive Prenatal Screening and Invasive Testing in Denmark (2000–2019) and Israel (2011–2019)
title_sort trends in non-invasive prenatal screening and invasive testing in denmark (2000–2019) and israel (2011–2019)
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8635699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34869484
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.768997
work_keys_str_mv AT sagidainlena trendsinnoninvasiveprenatalscreeningandinvasivetestingindenmark20002019andisrael20112019
AT singeramihood trendsinnoninvasiveprenatalscreeningandinvasivetestingindenmark20002019andisrael20112019
AT petersenolavb trendsinnoninvasiveprenatalscreeningandinvasivetestingindenmark20002019andisrael20112019
AT loustina trendsinnoninvasiveprenatalscreeningandinvasivetestingindenmark20002019andisrael20112019
AT vogelida trendsinnoninvasiveprenatalscreeningandinvasivetestingindenmark20002019andisrael20112019