Cargando…
Image Quality Evaluation of a Digital Radiography System Made in Thailand
BACKGROUND: The National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA) in Thailand researched and prototyped digital radiography systems under the brand name BodiiRay aiming for sustainable development and affordability of medical imaging technology. The image restoration and enhancement were im...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8635879/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34869760 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/3102673 |
_version_ | 1784608414519787520 |
---|---|
author | Techavipoo, Udomchai Sinsuebphon, Nattawut Prompalit, Sakunrat Thongvigitmanee, Saowapak Narkbuakaew, Walita Kiang-ia, Atthasak Srivongsa, Tanapon Thajchayapong, Pairash Chaumrattanakul, Utairat |
author_facet | Techavipoo, Udomchai Sinsuebphon, Nattawut Prompalit, Sakunrat Thongvigitmanee, Saowapak Narkbuakaew, Walita Kiang-ia, Atthasak Srivongsa, Tanapon Thajchayapong, Pairash Chaumrattanakul, Utairat |
author_sort | Techavipoo, Udomchai |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA) in Thailand researched and prototyped digital radiography systems under the brand name BodiiRay aiming for sustainable development and affordability of medical imaging technology. The image restoration and enhancement were implemented for the systems. PURPOSE: The image quality of the systems was evaluated using images from phantoms and from healthy volunteers. METHODS: The survey phantom images from BodiiRay and other two commercial systems using the exposure settings for the chest, the abdomen, and the extremity were evaluated by three experience observers in terms of the high-contrast image resolution, the low-contrast image detectability, and the grayscale differentiation. The volunteer images of the chests, the abdomens, and the extremities from BodiiRay were evaluated by three specialized radiologists based on visual grading on 5-point scaled questionnaires for the anatomy visibility, the image quality satisfaction, and the diagnosis confidence in using the images. RESULTS: BodiiRay phantom results were similar to those from the commercial systems. The overall performance averaged across the exposure settings showed that BodiiRay was slightly better than Fujifilm FDR Go in the low-contrast detectability (p = 0.033) and in the grayscale differentiation (p = 0.004). It was also slightly better than Siemens YSIO Max in the high-contrast resolution (p = 0.018). The images of chest, pelvis, and hand phantoms illustrated comparable visual quality. For volunteer images, the percentage of the images scored ≥4 ranged from 61% to 99%, 23% to 92%, and 96% to 99% for the chest, abdomen, and extremity images, respectively. The average score ranged from 3.63 to 4.46, 3.18 to 4.21, and 4.41 to 4.51 for the chest, abdomen, and extremity images, respectively. CONCLUSION: The phantom image results showed the comparability of these systems. The clinical evaluation showed BodiiRay images provided sufficient image qualities for digital radiography of these body parts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8635879 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86358792021-12-02 Image Quality Evaluation of a Digital Radiography System Made in Thailand Techavipoo, Udomchai Sinsuebphon, Nattawut Prompalit, Sakunrat Thongvigitmanee, Saowapak Narkbuakaew, Walita Kiang-ia, Atthasak Srivongsa, Tanapon Thajchayapong, Pairash Chaumrattanakul, Utairat Biomed Res Int Research Article BACKGROUND: The National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA) in Thailand researched and prototyped digital radiography systems under the brand name BodiiRay aiming for sustainable development and affordability of medical imaging technology. The image restoration and enhancement were implemented for the systems. PURPOSE: The image quality of the systems was evaluated using images from phantoms and from healthy volunteers. METHODS: The survey phantom images from BodiiRay and other two commercial systems using the exposure settings for the chest, the abdomen, and the extremity were evaluated by three experience observers in terms of the high-contrast image resolution, the low-contrast image detectability, and the grayscale differentiation. The volunteer images of the chests, the abdomens, and the extremities from BodiiRay were evaluated by three specialized radiologists based on visual grading on 5-point scaled questionnaires for the anatomy visibility, the image quality satisfaction, and the diagnosis confidence in using the images. RESULTS: BodiiRay phantom results were similar to those from the commercial systems. The overall performance averaged across the exposure settings showed that BodiiRay was slightly better than Fujifilm FDR Go in the low-contrast detectability (p = 0.033) and in the grayscale differentiation (p = 0.004). It was also slightly better than Siemens YSIO Max in the high-contrast resolution (p = 0.018). The images of chest, pelvis, and hand phantoms illustrated comparable visual quality. For volunteer images, the percentage of the images scored ≥4 ranged from 61% to 99%, 23% to 92%, and 96% to 99% for the chest, abdomen, and extremity images, respectively. The average score ranged from 3.63 to 4.46, 3.18 to 4.21, and 4.41 to 4.51 for the chest, abdomen, and extremity images, respectively. CONCLUSION: The phantom image results showed the comparability of these systems. The clinical evaluation showed BodiiRay images provided sufficient image qualities for digital radiography of these body parts. Hindawi 2021-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8635879/ /pubmed/34869760 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/3102673 Text en Copyright © 2021 Udomchai Techavipoo et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Techavipoo, Udomchai Sinsuebphon, Nattawut Prompalit, Sakunrat Thongvigitmanee, Saowapak Narkbuakaew, Walita Kiang-ia, Atthasak Srivongsa, Tanapon Thajchayapong, Pairash Chaumrattanakul, Utairat Image Quality Evaluation of a Digital Radiography System Made in Thailand |
title | Image Quality Evaluation of a Digital Radiography System Made in Thailand |
title_full | Image Quality Evaluation of a Digital Radiography System Made in Thailand |
title_fullStr | Image Quality Evaluation of a Digital Radiography System Made in Thailand |
title_full_unstemmed | Image Quality Evaluation of a Digital Radiography System Made in Thailand |
title_short | Image Quality Evaluation of a Digital Radiography System Made in Thailand |
title_sort | image quality evaluation of a digital radiography system made in thailand |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8635879/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34869760 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/3102673 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT techavipooudomchai imagequalityevaluationofadigitalradiographysystemmadeinthailand AT sinsuebphonnattawut imagequalityevaluationofadigitalradiographysystemmadeinthailand AT prompalitsakunrat imagequalityevaluationofadigitalradiographysystemmadeinthailand AT thongvigitmaneesaowapak imagequalityevaluationofadigitalradiographysystemmadeinthailand AT narkbuakaewwalita imagequalityevaluationofadigitalradiographysystemmadeinthailand AT kiangiaatthasak imagequalityevaluationofadigitalradiographysystemmadeinthailand AT srivongsatanapon imagequalityevaluationofadigitalradiographysystemmadeinthailand AT thajchayapongpairash imagequalityevaluationofadigitalradiographysystemmadeinthailand AT chaumrattanakulutairat imagequalityevaluationofadigitalradiographysystemmadeinthailand |