Cargando…

Deep infection after hip hemiarthroplasty: risk factors for infection and outcome of treatments

AIMS: Deep surgical site infection (SSI) remains an unsolved problem after hip fracture. Debridement, antibiotic, and implant retention (DAIR) has become a mainstream treatment in elective periprosthetic joint infection; however, evidence for DAIR after infected hip hemiarthroplaty is limited. METHO...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Craxford, Simon, Marson, Ben A., Nightingale, Jessica, Ikram, Adeel, Agrawal, Yuvraj, Deakin, Dan, Ollivere, Benjamin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8636303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34781709
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.211.BJO-2021-0128.R1
_version_ 1784608508456468480
author Craxford, Simon
Marson, Ben A.
Nightingale, Jessica
Ikram, Adeel
Agrawal, Yuvraj
Deakin, Dan
Ollivere, Benjamin
author_facet Craxford, Simon
Marson, Ben A.
Nightingale, Jessica
Ikram, Adeel
Agrawal, Yuvraj
Deakin, Dan
Ollivere, Benjamin
author_sort Craxford, Simon
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Deep surgical site infection (SSI) remains an unsolved problem after hip fracture. Debridement, antibiotic, and implant retention (DAIR) has become a mainstream treatment in elective periprosthetic joint infection; however, evidence for DAIR after infected hip hemiarthroplaty is limited. METHODS: Patients who underwent a hemiarthroplasty between March 2007 and August 2018 were reviewed. Multivariable binary logistic regression was performed to identify and adjust for risk factors for SSI, and to identify factors predicting a successful DAIR at one year. RESULTS: A total of 3,966 patients were identified. The overall rate of SSI was 1.7% (51 patients (1.3%) with deep SSI, and 18 (0.45%) with superficial SSI). In all, 50 patients underwent revision surgery for infection (43 with DAIR, and seven with excision arthroplasty). After adjustment for other variables, only concurrent urinary tract infection (odds ratio (OR) 2.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.57 to 4.92; p < 0.001) and increasing delay to theatre for treatment of the fracture (OR 1.31 per day, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.52; p < 0.001) were predictors of developing a SSI, while a cemented arthroplasty was protective (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.96; p = 0.031). In all, nine patients (20.9%) were alive at one year with a functioning hemiarthroplasty following DAIR, 20 (46.5%) required multiple surgical debridements after an initial DAIR, and 18 were converted to an excision arthroplasty due to persistent infection, with six were alive at one year. The culture of any gram-negative organism reduced success rates to 12.5% (no cases were successful with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or Pseudomonas infection). Favourable organisms included Citrobacter and Proteus (100% cure rate). The all-cause mortality at one year after deep SSI was 55.87% versus 24.9% without deep infection. CONCLUSION: Deep infection remains a devastating complication regardless of the treatment strategy employed. Success rates of DAIR are poor compared to total hip arthroplasty, and should be reserved for favourable organisms in patients able to tolerate multiple surgical procedures. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(11):958–965.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8636303
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86363032021-12-17 Deep infection after hip hemiarthroplasty: risk factors for infection and outcome of treatments Craxford, Simon Marson, Ben A. Nightingale, Jessica Ikram, Adeel Agrawal, Yuvraj Deakin, Dan Ollivere, Benjamin Bone Jt Open Trauma AIMS: Deep surgical site infection (SSI) remains an unsolved problem after hip fracture. Debridement, antibiotic, and implant retention (DAIR) has become a mainstream treatment in elective periprosthetic joint infection; however, evidence for DAIR after infected hip hemiarthroplaty is limited. METHODS: Patients who underwent a hemiarthroplasty between March 2007 and August 2018 were reviewed. Multivariable binary logistic regression was performed to identify and adjust for risk factors for SSI, and to identify factors predicting a successful DAIR at one year. RESULTS: A total of 3,966 patients were identified. The overall rate of SSI was 1.7% (51 patients (1.3%) with deep SSI, and 18 (0.45%) with superficial SSI). In all, 50 patients underwent revision surgery for infection (43 with DAIR, and seven with excision arthroplasty). After adjustment for other variables, only concurrent urinary tract infection (odds ratio (OR) 2.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.57 to 4.92; p < 0.001) and increasing delay to theatre for treatment of the fracture (OR 1.31 per day, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.52; p < 0.001) were predictors of developing a SSI, while a cemented arthroplasty was protective (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.96; p = 0.031). In all, nine patients (20.9%) were alive at one year with a functioning hemiarthroplasty following DAIR, 20 (46.5%) required multiple surgical debridements after an initial DAIR, and 18 were converted to an excision arthroplasty due to persistent infection, with six were alive at one year. The culture of any gram-negative organism reduced success rates to 12.5% (no cases were successful with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or Pseudomonas infection). Favourable organisms included Citrobacter and Proteus (100% cure rate). The all-cause mortality at one year after deep SSI was 55.87% versus 24.9% without deep infection. CONCLUSION: Deep infection remains a devastating complication regardless of the treatment strategy employed. Success rates of DAIR are poor compared to total hip arthroplasty, and should be reserved for favourable organisms in patients able to tolerate multiple surgical procedures. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(11):958–965. The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2021-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8636303/ /pubmed/34781709 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.211.BJO-2021-0128.R1 Text en © 2021 Author(s) et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits the copying and redistribution of the work only, and provided the original author and source are credited. See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle Trauma
Craxford, Simon
Marson, Ben A.
Nightingale, Jessica
Ikram, Adeel
Agrawal, Yuvraj
Deakin, Dan
Ollivere, Benjamin
Deep infection after hip hemiarthroplasty: risk factors for infection and outcome of treatments
title Deep infection after hip hemiarthroplasty: risk factors for infection and outcome of treatments
title_full Deep infection after hip hemiarthroplasty: risk factors for infection and outcome of treatments
title_fullStr Deep infection after hip hemiarthroplasty: risk factors for infection and outcome of treatments
title_full_unstemmed Deep infection after hip hemiarthroplasty: risk factors for infection and outcome of treatments
title_short Deep infection after hip hemiarthroplasty: risk factors for infection and outcome of treatments
title_sort deep infection after hip hemiarthroplasty: risk factors for infection and outcome of treatments
topic Trauma
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8636303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34781709
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.211.BJO-2021-0128.R1
work_keys_str_mv AT craxfordsimon deepinfectionafterhiphemiarthroplastyriskfactorsforinfectionandoutcomeoftreatments
AT marsonbena deepinfectionafterhiphemiarthroplastyriskfactorsforinfectionandoutcomeoftreatments
AT nightingalejessica deepinfectionafterhiphemiarthroplastyriskfactorsforinfectionandoutcomeoftreatments
AT ikramadeel deepinfectionafterhiphemiarthroplastyriskfactorsforinfectionandoutcomeoftreatments
AT agrawalyuvraj deepinfectionafterhiphemiarthroplastyriskfactorsforinfectionandoutcomeoftreatments
AT deakindan deepinfectionafterhiphemiarthroplastyriskfactorsforinfectionandoutcomeoftreatments
AT olliverebenjamin deepinfectionafterhiphemiarthroplastyriskfactorsforinfectionandoutcomeoftreatments