Cargando…
Lord–Wingersky Algorithm Version 2.5 with Applications
Item response theory scoring based on summed scores is employed frequently in the practice of educational and psychological measurement. Lord and Wingersky (Appl Psychol Meas 8(4):453–461, 1984) proposed a recursive algorithm to compute the summed score likelihood. Cai (Psychometrika 80(2):535–559,...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8636413/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34313920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11336-021-09785-y |
_version_ | 1784608521770237952 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Sijia Cai, Li |
author_facet | Huang, Sijia Cai, Li |
author_sort | Huang, Sijia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Item response theory scoring based on summed scores is employed frequently in the practice of educational and psychological measurement. Lord and Wingersky (Appl Psychol Meas 8(4):453–461, 1984) proposed a recursive algorithm to compute the summed score likelihood. Cai (Psychometrika 80(2):535–559, 2015) extended the original Lord–Wingersky algorithm to the case of two-tier multidimensional item factor models and called it Lord–Wingersky algorithm Version 2.0. The 2.0 algorithm utilizes dimension reduction to efficiently compute summed score likelihoods associated with the general dimensions in the model. The output of the algorithm is useful for various purposes, for example, scoring, scale alignment, and model fit checking. In the research reported here, a further extension to the Lord–Wingersky algorithm 2.0 is proposed. The new algorithm, which we call Lord–Wingersky algorithm Version 2.5, yields the summed score likelihoods for all latent variables in the model conditional on observed score combinations. The proposed algorithm is illustrated with empirical data for three potential application areas: (a) describing achievement growth using score combinations across adjacent grades, (b) identification of noteworthy subscores for reporting, and (c) detection of aberrant responses. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8636413 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86364132021-12-03 Lord–Wingersky Algorithm Version 2.5 with Applications Huang, Sijia Cai, Li Psychometrika Theory and Methods Item response theory scoring based on summed scores is employed frequently in the practice of educational and psychological measurement. Lord and Wingersky (Appl Psychol Meas 8(4):453–461, 1984) proposed a recursive algorithm to compute the summed score likelihood. Cai (Psychometrika 80(2):535–559, 2015) extended the original Lord–Wingersky algorithm to the case of two-tier multidimensional item factor models and called it Lord–Wingersky algorithm Version 2.0. The 2.0 algorithm utilizes dimension reduction to efficiently compute summed score likelihoods associated with the general dimensions in the model. The output of the algorithm is useful for various purposes, for example, scoring, scale alignment, and model fit checking. In the research reported here, a further extension to the Lord–Wingersky algorithm 2.0 is proposed. The new algorithm, which we call Lord–Wingersky algorithm Version 2.5, yields the summed score likelihoods for all latent variables in the model conditional on observed score combinations. The proposed algorithm is illustrated with empirical data for three potential application areas: (a) describing achievement growth using score combinations across adjacent grades, (b) identification of noteworthy subscores for reporting, and (c) detection of aberrant responses. Springer US 2021-07-27 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8636413/ /pubmed/34313920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11336-021-09785-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Theory and Methods Huang, Sijia Cai, Li Lord–Wingersky Algorithm Version 2.5 with Applications |
title | Lord–Wingersky Algorithm Version 2.5 with Applications |
title_full | Lord–Wingersky Algorithm Version 2.5 with Applications |
title_fullStr | Lord–Wingersky Algorithm Version 2.5 with Applications |
title_full_unstemmed | Lord–Wingersky Algorithm Version 2.5 with Applications |
title_short | Lord–Wingersky Algorithm Version 2.5 with Applications |
title_sort | lord–wingersky algorithm version 2.5 with applications |
topic | Theory and Methods |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8636413/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34313920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11336-021-09785-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huangsijia lordwingerskyalgorithmversion25withapplications AT caili lordwingerskyalgorithmversion25withapplications |