Cargando…

Quality and cost outcomes of an integrated supportive care program

PURPOSE: This article reports findings from a demonstration project funded by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI). The purpose of the project was to test a supportive care program on the outcomes of quality of care and quality of life, and costs in patients with advanced cancer. M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weinstein, Elizabeth, Kemmann, Matthew, Douglas, Sara L., Daly, Barbara, Levitan, Nathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8636436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34333699
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06450-z
_version_ 1784608526926086144
author Weinstein, Elizabeth
Kemmann, Matthew
Douglas, Sara L.
Daly, Barbara
Levitan, Nathan
author_facet Weinstein, Elizabeth
Kemmann, Matthew
Douglas, Sara L.
Daly, Barbara
Levitan, Nathan
author_sort Weinstein, Elizabeth
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This article reports findings from a demonstration project funded by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI). The purpose of the project was to test a supportive care program on the outcomes of quality of care and quality of life, and costs in patients with advanced cancer. METHODS: The project was conducted between February 2015 and February 2018, enrolling adult, Medicare or Medicaid beneficiaries with advanced or progressed solid tumor malignancy. A comparative longitudinal comparison of the program with both a concurrent control and an historic control was used to evaluate outcomes. The intervention included routine electronic biopsychosocial screening, early access to specialty palliative care, and nurse care coordination. Quality of life, aggressiveness of care, and healthcare utilization were measured. RESULTS: A total of 1340 people were enrolled, with 71% of the total sample being Caucasian; 41.4% had stage IV cancer, and 20% utilized Medicaid only. Significant differences in the enrolled patients and the comparison group were controlled for through statistical analysis. There were significantly fewer ED visits, unplanned admissions, and fewer total hospitalization days in the intervention group. In the last 30 days of life, hospital and ICU admissions were less and a greater proportion of patients were enrolled in hospice in the intervention group. Quality of life had a marked improvement for enrolled patients. Average cost per member per month was not less in the enrolled group. CONCLUSION: This pragmatic demonstration project confirmed the clinical benefits of an integration of supportive care for patients with advanced cancer, although no reduction in costs was found.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8636436
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86364362021-12-03 Quality and cost outcomes of an integrated supportive care program Weinstein, Elizabeth Kemmann, Matthew Douglas, Sara L. Daly, Barbara Levitan, Nathan Support Care Cancer Original Article PURPOSE: This article reports findings from a demonstration project funded by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI). The purpose of the project was to test a supportive care program on the outcomes of quality of care and quality of life, and costs in patients with advanced cancer. METHODS: The project was conducted between February 2015 and February 2018, enrolling adult, Medicare or Medicaid beneficiaries with advanced or progressed solid tumor malignancy. A comparative longitudinal comparison of the program with both a concurrent control and an historic control was used to evaluate outcomes. The intervention included routine electronic biopsychosocial screening, early access to specialty palliative care, and nurse care coordination. Quality of life, aggressiveness of care, and healthcare utilization were measured. RESULTS: A total of 1340 people were enrolled, with 71% of the total sample being Caucasian; 41.4% had stage IV cancer, and 20% utilized Medicaid only. Significant differences in the enrolled patients and the comparison group were controlled for through statistical analysis. There were significantly fewer ED visits, unplanned admissions, and fewer total hospitalization days in the intervention group. In the last 30 days of life, hospital and ICU admissions were less and a greater proportion of patients were enrolled in hospice in the intervention group. Quality of life had a marked improvement for enrolled patients. Average cost per member per month was not less in the enrolled group. CONCLUSION: This pragmatic demonstration project confirmed the clinical benefits of an integration of supportive care for patients with advanced cancer, although no reduction in costs was found. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-08-01 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8636436/ /pubmed/34333699 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06450-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Weinstein, Elizabeth
Kemmann, Matthew
Douglas, Sara L.
Daly, Barbara
Levitan, Nathan
Quality and cost outcomes of an integrated supportive care program
title Quality and cost outcomes of an integrated supportive care program
title_full Quality and cost outcomes of an integrated supportive care program
title_fullStr Quality and cost outcomes of an integrated supportive care program
title_full_unstemmed Quality and cost outcomes of an integrated supportive care program
title_short Quality and cost outcomes of an integrated supportive care program
title_sort quality and cost outcomes of an integrated supportive care program
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8636436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34333699
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06450-z
work_keys_str_mv AT weinsteinelizabeth qualityandcostoutcomesofanintegratedsupportivecareprogram
AT kemmannmatthew qualityandcostoutcomesofanintegratedsupportivecareprogram
AT douglassaral qualityandcostoutcomesofanintegratedsupportivecareprogram
AT dalybarbara qualityandcostoutcomesofanintegratedsupportivecareprogram
AT levitannathan qualityandcostoutcomesofanintegratedsupportivecareprogram