Cargando…

Is psychosis a syndemic manifestation of historical and contemporary adversity? Findings from UK Biobank

BACKGROUND: Psychosis is associated with many forms of adversity, deprivation and living in urban areas. AIMS: To investigate whether psychosis is part of a syndemic of multiple adversities. METHOD: Drawing on UK Biobank (UKBB) data (Project ID: 57601), we sought to understand mechanisms by which ch...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bhui, Kamaldeep, Halvorsrud, Kristoffer, Mooney, Roisin, Hosang, Georgina M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8636607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35048874
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2021.142
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Psychosis is associated with many forms of adversity, deprivation and living in urban areas. AIMS: To investigate whether psychosis is part of a syndemic of multiple adversities. METHOD: Drawing on UK Biobank (UKBB) data (Project ID: 57601), we sought to understand mechanisms by which childhood, recent/contemporary and place-based adversities might cluster and interact to be implicated in pathways by which psychoses evolve. We investigated the associations between adversities, potential mediating inflammatory markers and ICD-10 diagnoses (F20–F31) of psychotic disorders. We fitted logistic regression models initially including all relevant candidate variables and used backwards deletion to retain theoretically plausible and statistically significant (P < 0.05) associations with psychotic disorders. The candidate variables were entered in a partial least squares structural equation model (PLS-SEM) to test for syndemic interactions between risk factors. We tested whether the findings were sensitive to demographics, gender and ethnicity. RESULTS: We fitted a PLS-SEM including psychosis as a syndemic outcome, and identified three latent constructs: lifetime adversity, current adversity and biomarkers. Factor loadings were above 0.30, and all structural paths were significant (P < 0.05). There were moderate associations between lifetime adversity and current adversity (standardised coefficient s.c. = 0.178) and between current adversity and biomarkers (s.c. = 0.227). All three latent constructs showed small but significant associations with psychosis (s.c. < 0.04). Lifetime adversity and current adversity were more strongly associated among ethnic minorities (combined) than White British people. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings stress the importance of interactions between childhood and contemporary adversities in preventive and therapeutic interventions for psychotic disorders, especially among ethnic minorities.