Cargando…
Counting using deep learning regression gives value to ecological surveys
Many ecological studies rely on count data and involve manual counting of objects of interest, which is time-consuming and especially disadvantageous when time in the field or lab is limited. However, an increasing number of works uses digital imagery, which opens opportunities to automatise countin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8636638/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34853327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-02387-9 |
_version_ | 1784608567433625600 |
---|---|
author | Hoekendijk, Jeroen P. A. Kellenberger, Benjamin Aarts, Geert Brasseur, Sophie Poiesz, Suzanne S. H. Tuia, Devis |
author_facet | Hoekendijk, Jeroen P. A. Kellenberger, Benjamin Aarts, Geert Brasseur, Sophie Poiesz, Suzanne S. H. Tuia, Devis |
author_sort | Hoekendijk, Jeroen P. A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Many ecological studies rely on count data and involve manual counting of objects of interest, which is time-consuming and especially disadvantageous when time in the field or lab is limited. However, an increasing number of works uses digital imagery, which opens opportunities to automatise counting tasks. In this study, we use machine learning to automate counting objects of interest without the need to label individual objects. By leveraging already existing image-level annotations, this approach can also give value to historical data that were collected and annotated over longer time series (typical for many ecological studies), without the aim of deep learning applications. We demonstrate deep learning regression on two fundamentally different counting tasks: (i) daily growth rings from microscopic images of fish otolith (i.e., hearing stone) and (ii) hauled out seals from highly variable aerial imagery. In the otolith images, our deep learning-based regressor yields an RMSE of 3.40 day-rings and an [Formula: see text] of 0.92. Initial performance in the seal images is lower (RMSE of 23.46 seals and [Formula: see text] of 0.72), which can be attributed to a lack of images with a high number of seals in the initial training set, compared to the test set. We then show how to improve performance substantially (RMSE of 19.03 seals and [Formula: see text] of 0.77) by carefully selecting and relabelling just 100 additional training images based on initial model prediction discrepancy. The regression-based approach used here returns accurate counts ([Formula: see text] of 0.92 and 0.77 for the rings and seals, respectively), directly usable in ecological research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8636638 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86366382021-12-03 Counting using deep learning regression gives value to ecological surveys Hoekendijk, Jeroen P. A. Kellenberger, Benjamin Aarts, Geert Brasseur, Sophie Poiesz, Suzanne S. H. Tuia, Devis Sci Rep Article Many ecological studies rely on count data and involve manual counting of objects of interest, which is time-consuming and especially disadvantageous when time in the field or lab is limited. However, an increasing number of works uses digital imagery, which opens opportunities to automatise counting tasks. In this study, we use machine learning to automate counting objects of interest without the need to label individual objects. By leveraging already existing image-level annotations, this approach can also give value to historical data that were collected and annotated over longer time series (typical for many ecological studies), without the aim of deep learning applications. We demonstrate deep learning regression on two fundamentally different counting tasks: (i) daily growth rings from microscopic images of fish otolith (i.e., hearing stone) and (ii) hauled out seals from highly variable aerial imagery. In the otolith images, our deep learning-based regressor yields an RMSE of 3.40 day-rings and an [Formula: see text] of 0.92. Initial performance in the seal images is lower (RMSE of 23.46 seals and [Formula: see text] of 0.72), which can be attributed to a lack of images with a high number of seals in the initial training set, compared to the test set. We then show how to improve performance substantially (RMSE of 19.03 seals and [Formula: see text] of 0.77) by carefully selecting and relabelling just 100 additional training images based on initial model prediction discrepancy. The regression-based approach used here returns accurate counts ([Formula: see text] of 0.92 and 0.77 for the rings and seals, respectively), directly usable in ecological research. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8636638/ /pubmed/34853327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-02387-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Hoekendijk, Jeroen P. A. Kellenberger, Benjamin Aarts, Geert Brasseur, Sophie Poiesz, Suzanne S. H. Tuia, Devis Counting using deep learning regression gives value to ecological surveys |
title | Counting using deep learning regression gives value to ecological surveys |
title_full | Counting using deep learning regression gives value to ecological surveys |
title_fullStr | Counting using deep learning regression gives value to ecological surveys |
title_full_unstemmed | Counting using deep learning regression gives value to ecological surveys |
title_short | Counting using deep learning regression gives value to ecological surveys |
title_sort | counting using deep learning regression gives value to ecological surveys |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8636638/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34853327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-02387-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hoekendijkjeroenpa countingusingdeeplearningregressiongivesvaluetoecologicalsurveys AT kellenbergerbenjamin countingusingdeeplearningregressiongivesvaluetoecologicalsurveys AT aartsgeert countingusingdeeplearningregressiongivesvaluetoecologicalsurveys AT brasseursophie countingusingdeeplearningregressiongivesvaluetoecologicalsurveys AT poieszsuzannesh countingusingdeeplearningregressiongivesvaluetoecologicalsurveys AT tuiadevis countingusingdeeplearningregressiongivesvaluetoecologicalsurveys |