Cargando…

Counting using deep learning regression gives value to ecological surveys

Many ecological studies rely on count data and involve manual counting of objects of interest, which is time-consuming and especially disadvantageous when time in the field or lab is limited. However, an increasing number of works uses digital imagery, which opens opportunities to automatise countin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hoekendijk, Jeroen P. A., Kellenberger, Benjamin, Aarts, Geert, Brasseur, Sophie, Poiesz, Suzanne S. H., Tuia, Devis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8636638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34853327
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-02387-9
_version_ 1784608567433625600
author Hoekendijk, Jeroen P. A.
Kellenberger, Benjamin
Aarts, Geert
Brasseur, Sophie
Poiesz, Suzanne S. H.
Tuia, Devis
author_facet Hoekendijk, Jeroen P. A.
Kellenberger, Benjamin
Aarts, Geert
Brasseur, Sophie
Poiesz, Suzanne S. H.
Tuia, Devis
author_sort Hoekendijk, Jeroen P. A.
collection PubMed
description Many ecological studies rely on count data and involve manual counting of objects of interest, which is time-consuming and especially disadvantageous when time in the field or lab is limited. However, an increasing number of works uses digital imagery, which opens opportunities to automatise counting tasks. In this study, we use machine learning to automate counting objects of interest without the need to label individual objects. By leveraging already existing image-level annotations, this approach can also give value to historical data that were collected and annotated over longer time series (typical for many ecological studies), without the aim of deep learning applications. We demonstrate deep learning regression on two fundamentally different counting tasks: (i) daily growth rings from microscopic images of fish otolith (i.e., hearing stone) and (ii) hauled out seals from highly variable aerial imagery. In the otolith images, our deep learning-based regressor yields an RMSE of 3.40 day-rings and an [Formula: see text] of 0.92. Initial performance in the seal images is lower (RMSE of 23.46 seals and [Formula: see text] of 0.72), which can be attributed to a lack of images with a high number of seals in the initial training set, compared to the test set. We then show how to improve performance substantially (RMSE of 19.03 seals and [Formula: see text] of 0.77) by carefully selecting and relabelling just 100 additional training images based on initial model prediction discrepancy. The regression-based approach used here returns accurate counts ([Formula: see text] of 0.92 and 0.77 for the rings and seals, respectively), directly usable in ecological research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8636638
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86366382021-12-03 Counting using deep learning regression gives value to ecological surveys Hoekendijk, Jeroen P. A. Kellenberger, Benjamin Aarts, Geert Brasseur, Sophie Poiesz, Suzanne S. H. Tuia, Devis Sci Rep Article Many ecological studies rely on count data and involve manual counting of objects of interest, which is time-consuming and especially disadvantageous when time in the field or lab is limited. However, an increasing number of works uses digital imagery, which opens opportunities to automatise counting tasks. In this study, we use machine learning to automate counting objects of interest without the need to label individual objects. By leveraging already existing image-level annotations, this approach can also give value to historical data that were collected and annotated over longer time series (typical for many ecological studies), without the aim of deep learning applications. We demonstrate deep learning regression on two fundamentally different counting tasks: (i) daily growth rings from microscopic images of fish otolith (i.e., hearing stone) and (ii) hauled out seals from highly variable aerial imagery. In the otolith images, our deep learning-based regressor yields an RMSE of 3.40 day-rings and an [Formula: see text] of 0.92. Initial performance in the seal images is lower (RMSE of 23.46 seals and [Formula: see text] of 0.72), which can be attributed to a lack of images with a high number of seals in the initial training set, compared to the test set. We then show how to improve performance substantially (RMSE of 19.03 seals and [Formula: see text] of 0.77) by carefully selecting and relabelling just 100 additional training images based on initial model prediction discrepancy. The regression-based approach used here returns accurate counts ([Formula: see text] of 0.92 and 0.77 for the rings and seals, respectively), directly usable in ecological research. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8636638/ /pubmed/34853327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-02387-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Hoekendijk, Jeroen P. A.
Kellenberger, Benjamin
Aarts, Geert
Brasseur, Sophie
Poiesz, Suzanne S. H.
Tuia, Devis
Counting using deep learning regression gives value to ecological surveys
title Counting using deep learning regression gives value to ecological surveys
title_full Counting using deep learning regression gives value to ecological surveys
title_fullStr Counting using deep learning regression gives value to ecological surveys
title_full_unstemmed Counting using deep learning regression gives value to ecological surveys
title_short Counting using deep learning regression gives value to ecological surveys
title_sort counting using deep learning regression gives value to ecological surveys
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8636638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34853327
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-02387-9
work_keys_str_mv AT hoekendijkjeroenpa countingusingdeeplearningregressiongivesvaluetoecologicalsurveys
AT kellenbergerbenjamin countingusingdeeplearningregressiongivesvaluetoecologicalsurveys
AT aartsgeert countingusingdeeplearningregressiongivesvaluetoecologicalsurveys
AT brasseursophie countingusingdeeplearningregressiongivesvaluetoecologicalsurveys
AT poieszsuzannesh countingusingdeeplearningregressiongivesvaluetoecologicalsurveys
AT tuiadevis countingusingdeeplearningregressiongivesvaluetoecologicalsurveys