Cargando…

Breeding Beyond Monoculture: Putting the “Intercrop” Into Crops

Intercropping is both a well-established and yet novel agricultural practice, depending on one’s perspective. Such perspectives are principally governed by geographic location and whether monocultural practices predominate. Given the negative environmental effects of monoculture agriculture (loss of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bourke, Peter M., Evers, Jochem B., Bijma, Piter, van Apeldoorn, Dirk F., Smulders, Marinus J. M., Kuyper, Thomas W., Mommer, Liesje, Bonnema, Guusje
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8636715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34868116
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.734167
_version_ 1784608586006003712
author Bourke, Peter M.
Evers, Jochem B.
Bijma, Piter
van Apeldoorn, Dirk F.
Smulders, Marinus J. M.
Kuyper, Thomas W.
Mommer, Liesje
Bonnema, Guusje
author_facet Bourke, Peter M.
Evers, Jochem B.
Bijma, Piter
van Apeldoorn, Dirk F.
Smulders, Marinus J. M.
Kuyper, Thomas W.
Mommer, Liesje
Bonnema, Guusje
author_sort Bourke, Peter M.
collection PubMed
description Intercropping is both a well-established and yet novel agricultural practice, depending on one’s perspective. Such perspectives are principally governed by geographic location and whether monocultural practices predominate. Given the negative environmental effects of monoculture agriculture (loss of biodiversity, reliance on non-renewable inputs, soil degradation, etc.), there has been a renewed interest in cropping systems that can reduce the impact of modern agriculture while maintaining (or even increasing) yields. Intercropping is one of the most promising practices in this regard, yet faces a multitude of challenges if it is to compete with and ultimately replace the prevailing monocultural norm. These challenges include the necessity for more complex agricultural designs in space and time, bespoke machinery, and adapted crop cultivars. Plant breeding for monocultures has focused on maximizing yield in single-species stands, leading to highly productive yet specialized genotypes. However, indications suggest that these genotypes are not the best adapted to intercropping systems. Re-designing breeding programs to accommodate inter-specific interactions and compatibilities, with potentially multiple different intercropping partners, is certainly challenging, but recent technological advances offer novel solutions. We identify a number of such technology-driven directions, either ideotype-driven (i.e., “trait-based” breeding) or quantitative genetics-driven (i.e., “product-based” breeding). For ideotype breeding, plant growth modeling can help predict plant traits that affect both inter- and intraspecific interactions and their influence on crop performance. Quantitative breeding approaches, on the other hand, estimate breeding values of component crops without necessarily understanding the underlying mechanisms. We argue that a combined approach, for example, integrating plant growth modeling with genomic-assisted selection and indirect genetic effects, may offer the best chance to bridge the gap between current monoculture breeding programs and the more integrated and diverse breeding programs of the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8636715
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86367152021-12-03 Breeding Beyond Monoculture: Putting the “Intercrop” Into Crops Bourke, Peter M. Evers, Jochem B. Bijma, Piter van Apeldoorn, Dirk F. Smulders, Marinus J. M. Kuyper, Thomas W. Mommer, Liesje Bonnema, Guusje Front Plant Sci Plant Science Intercropping is both a well-established and yet novel agricultural practice, depending on one’s perspective. Such perspectives are principally governed by geographic location and whether monocultural practices predominate. Given the negative environmental effects of monoculture agriculture (loss of biodiversity, reliance on non-renewable inputs, soil degradation, etc.), there has been a renewed interest in cropping systems that can reduce the impact of modern agriculture while maintaining (or even increasing) yields. Intercropping is one of the most promising practices in this regard, yet faces a multitude of challenges if it is to compete with and ultimately replace the prevailing monocultural norm. These challenges include the necessity for more complex agricultural designs in space and time, bespoke machinery, and adapted crop cultivars. Plant breeding for monocultures has focused on maximizing yield in single-species stands, leading to highly productive yet specialized genotypes. However, indications suggest that these genotypes are not the best adapted to intercropping systems. Re-designing breeding programs to accommodate inter-specific interactions and compatibilities, with potentially multiple different intercropping partners, is certainly challenging, but recent technological advances offer novel solutions. We identify a number of such technology-driven directions, either ideotype-driven (i.e., “trait-based” breeding) or quantitative genetics-driven (i.e., “product-based” breeding). For ideotype breeding, plant growth modeling can help predict plant traits that affect both inter- and intraspecific interactions and their influence on crop performance. Quantitative breeding approaches, on the other hand, estimate breeding values of component crops without necessarily understanding the underlying mechanisms. We argue that a combined approach, for example, integrating plant growth modeling with genomic-assisted selection and indirect genetic effects, may offer the best chance to bridge the gap between current monoculture breeding programs and the more integrated and diverse breeding programs of the future. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8636715/ /pubmed/34868116 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.734167 Text en Copyright © 2021 Bourke, Evers, Bijma, van Apeldoorn, Smulders, Kuyper, Mommer and Bonnema. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Plant Science
Bourke, Peter M.
Evers, Jochem B.
Bijma, Piter
van Apeldoorn, Dirk F.
Smulders, Marinus J. M.
Kuyper, Thomas W.
Mommer, Liesje
Bonnema, Guusje
Breeding Beyond Monoculture: Putting the “Intercrop” Into Crops
title Breeding Beyond Monoculture: Putting the “Intercrop” Into Crops
title_full Breeding Beyond Monoculture: Putting the “Intercrop” Into Crops
title_fullStr Breeding Beyond Monoculture: Putting the “Intercrop” Into Crops
title_full_unstemmed Breeding Beyond Monoculture: Putting the “Intercrop” Into Crops
title_short Breeding Beyond Monoculture: Putting the “Intercrop” Into Crops
title_sort breeding beyond monoculture: putting the “intercrop” into crops
topic Plant Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8636715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34868116
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.734167
work_keys_str_mv AT bourkepeterm breedingbeyondmonocultureputtingtheintercropintocrops
AT eversjochemb breedingbeyondmonocultureputtingtheintercropintocrops
AT bijmapiter breedingbeyondmonocultureputtingtheintercropintocrops
AT vanapeldoorndirkf breedingbeyondmonocultureputtingtheintercropintocrops
AT smuldersmarinusjm breedingbeyondmonocultureputtingtheintercropintocrops
AT kuyperthomasw breedingbeyondmonocultureputtingtheintercropintocrops
AT mommerliesje breedingbeyondmonocultureputtingtheintercropintocrops
AT bonnemaguusje breedingbeyondmonocultureputtingtheintercropintocrops