Cargando…
Restrictive vs. Liberal Red Blood Cell Transfusion Strategy in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Anemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Objective: Anemia is frequent in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and the optimal red blood cell transfusion strategy for AMI patients with anemia is still controversial. We aimed to compare the efficacy of restrictive and liberal red cell transfusion strategies in AMI patients with...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8636896/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34869640 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.736163 |
_version_ | 1784608628619083776 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Yeshen Xu, Zhengrong Huang, Yuming Ye, Qirao Xie, Nianjin Zeng, Lihuan Lian, Xingji Dai, Yining Chen, Jiyan He, Pengcheng Tan, Ning Liu, Yuanhui |
author_facet | Zhang, Yeshen Xu, Zhengrong Huang, Yuming Ye, Qirao Xie, Nianjin Zeng, Lihuan Lian, Xingji Dai, Yining Chen, Jiyan He, Pengcheng Tan, Ning Liu, Yuanhui |
author_sort | Zhang, Yeshen |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: Anemia is frequent in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and the optimal red blood cell transfusion strategy for AMI patients with anemia is still controversial. We aimed to compare the efficacy of restrictive and liberal red cell transfusion strategies in AMI patients with anemia. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Clinicaltrials.gov, from their inception until March 2021. Studies designed to compare the efficacy between restrictive and liberal red blood cell transfusion strategies in patients with AMI were included. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, including overall mortality, in-hospital or follow-up mortality. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were presented and pooled by random-effects models. Results: The search yielded a total of 6,630 participants in six studies. A total of 2,008 patients received restrictive red blood cell transfusion while 4,622 patients were given liberal red blood cell transfusion. No difference was found in overall mortality and follow-up mortality between restrictive and liberal transfusion groups (RR = 1.07, 95% CI = 0.82–1.40, P = 0.62; RR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.56–1.42, P = 0.62). However, restrictive transfusion tended to have a higher risk of in-hospital mortality compared with liberal transfusion (RR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.00–1.50, P = 0.05). No secondary outcomes, including follow-up reinfarction, stroke, and acute heart failure, differed significantly between the two groups. In addition, subgroup analysis showed no differences in overall mortality between the two groups based on sample size and design. Conclusion: Restrictive and liberal red blood cell transfusion have a similar effect on overall mortality and follow-up mortality in AMI patients with anemia. However, restrictive transfusion tended to have a higher risk of in-hospital mortality compared with liberal transfusion. The findings suggest that transfusion strategy should be further evaluated in future studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8636896 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86368962021-12-03 Restrictive vs. Liberal Red Blood Cell Transfusion Strategy in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Anemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Zhang, Yeshen Xu, Zhengrong Huang, Yuming Ye, Qirao Xie, Nianjin Zeng, Lihuan Lian, Xingji Dai, Yining Chen, Jiyan He, Pengcheng Tan, Ning Liu, Yuanhui Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine Objective: Anemia is frequent in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and the optimal red blood cell transfusion strategy for AMI patients with anemia is still controversial. We aimed to compare the efficacy of restrictive and liberal red cell transfusion strategies in AMI patients with anemia. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Clinicaltrials.gov, from their inception until March 2021. Studies designed to compare the efficacy between restrictive and liberal red blood cell transfusion strategies in patients with AMI were included. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, including overall mortality, in-hospital or follow-up mortality. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were presented and pooled by random-effects models. Results: The search yielded a total of 6,630 participants in six studies. A total of 2,008 patients received restrictive red blood cell transfusion while 4,622 patients were given liberal red blood cell transfusion. No difference was found in overall mortality and follow-up mortality between restrictive and liberal transfusion groups (RR = 1.07, 95% CI = 0.82–1.40, P = 0.62; RR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.56–1.42, P = 0.62). However, restrictive transfusion tended to have a higher risk of in-hospital mortality compared with liberal transfusion (RR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.00–1.50, P = 0.05). No secondary outcomes, including follow-up reinfarction, stroke, and acute heart failure, differed significantly between the two groups. In addition, subgroup analysis showed no differences in overall mortality between the two groups based on sample size and design. Conclusion: Restrictive and liberal red blood cell transfusion have a similar effect on overall mortality and follow-up mortality in AMI patients with anemia. However, restrictive transfusion tended to have a higher risk of in-hospital mortality compared with liberal transfusion. The findings suggest that transfusion strategy should be further evaluated in future studies. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8636896/ /pubmed/34869640 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.736163 Text en Copyright © 2021 Zhang, Xu, Huang, Ye, Xie, Zeng, Lian, Dai, Chen, He, Tan and Liu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Cardiovascular Medicine Zhang, Yeshen Xu, Zhengrong Huang, Yuming Ye, Qirao Xie, Nianjin Zeng, Lihuan Lian, Xingji Dai, Yining Chen, Jiyan He, Pengcheng Tan, Ning Liu, Yuanhui Restrictive vs. Liberal Red Blood Cell Transfusion Strategy in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Anemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Restrictive vs. Liberal Red Blood Cell Transfusion Strategy in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Anemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Restrictive vs. Liberal Red Blood Cell Transfusion Strategy in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Anemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Restrictive vs. Liberal Red Blood Cell Transfusion Strategy in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Anemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Restrictive vs. Liberal Red Blood Cell Transfusion Strategy in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Anemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Restrictive vs. Liberal Red Blood Cell Transfusion Strategy in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Anemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | restrictive vs. liberal red blood cell transfusion strategy in patients with acute myocardial infarction and anemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Cardiovascular Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8636896/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34869640 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.736163 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangyeshen restrictivevsliberalredbloodcelltransfusionstrategyinpatientswithacutemyocardialinfarctionandanemiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT xuzhengrong restrictivevsliberalredbloodcelltransfusionstrategyinpatientswithacutemyocardialinfarctionandanemiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT huangyuming restrictivevsliberalredbloodcelltransfusionstrategyinpatientswithacutemyocardialinfarctionandanemiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yeqirao restrictivevsliberalredbloodcelltransfusionstrategyinpatientswithacutemyocardialinfarctionandanemiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT xienianjin restrictivevsliberalredbloodcelltransfusionstrategyinpatientswithacutemyocardialinfarctionandanemiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zenglihuan restrictivevsliberalredbloodcelltransfusionstrategyinpatientswithacutemyocardialinfarctionandanemiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lianxingji restrictivevsliberalredbloodcelltransfusionstrategyinpatientswithacutemyocardialinfarctionandanemiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT daiyining restrictivevsliberalredbloodcelltransfusionstrategyinpatientswithacutemyocardialinfarctionandanemiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chenjiyan restrictivevsliberalredbloodcelltransfusionstrategyinpatientswithacutemyocardialinfarctionandanemiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hepengcheng restrictivevsliberalredbloodcelltransfusionstrategyinpatientswithacutemyocardialinfarctionandanemiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT tanning restrictivevsliberalredbloodcelltransfusionstrategyinpatientswithacutemyocardialinfarctionandanemiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liuyuanhui restrictivevsliberalredbloodcelltransfusionstrategyinpatientswithacutemyocardialinfarctionandanemiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |