Cargando…

Treatment of Dry Eye With Intracanalicular Injection of Hydroxybutyl Chitosan: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial

Background: Punctal/intracanalicular plugs on the market nowadays are all designed before clinical use in treating dry eye disease (DED). To provide an individualized lacrimal drainage system occlusion method and reduce the complications, we developed a “liquid plug” strategy by intracanalicular inj...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Tong, Wang, Wushuang, Lu, Yang, Gong, Lan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8637016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34869486
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.769448
_version_ 1784608656655908864
author Lin, Tong
Wang, Wushuang
Lu, Yang
Gong, Lan
author_facet Lin, Tong
Wang, Wushuang
Lu, Yang
Gong, Lan
author_sort Lin, Tong
collection PubMed
description Background: Punctal/intracanalicular plugs on the market nowadays are all designed before clinical use in treating dry eye disease (DED). To provide an individualized lacrimal drainage system occlusion method and reduce the complications, we developed a “liquid plug” strategy by intracanalicular injection of hydroxybutyl chitosan (HBC) solution, a thermosensitive, phase-changing biomaterial. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the HBC plug in treating dry eye disease by comparing it with the VisiPlug absorbable intracanalicular plug. Methods: A monocenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial was performed. Fifty patients with DED were randomized 1:1 to undergo either the HBC injection treatment or the VisiPlug treatment. Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire, tear break-up time (TBUT), corneal fluorescence staining (CFS), tear meniscus height (TMH), and phenol red thread test were evaluated at Day 0 (baseline, before treatment) and Weeks 1, 4, and 12. Results: The two groups had a balanced baseline of age, gender, and DED-related characteristics. Both occlusion methods could relieve the symptoms and signs of DED. Significant improvement was found in OSDI, phenol red thread test, and tear meniscus height (P < 0.05 compared to baseline) but not in corneal fluorescence staining and tear break-up time (P > 0.05). There is no statistically significant difference between HBC injection and VisiPlug at Weeks 1 and 4 (P > 0.05). However, at week 12, the HBC injection was not as effective as the VisiPlug in maintaining phenol red thread test (HBC: 5.35 ± 3.22 mm, VisiPlug: 8.59 ± 4.35 mm, P = 0.009) and tear meniscus height (HBC: 206.9 ± 47.95 μm, VisiPlug: 242.59 ± 60.30 μm, P = 0.041). The numbers of ocular adverse events were relatively low in both groups. Conclusions: The HBC injection showed similar efficacy and safety compared to VisiPlug. The intracanalicular injection of HBC solution proves to be a promising, individualizing method to treat DED. Clinical Trial Registration: This study is registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (https://www.chictr.org.cn/enindex.aspx), Identifier: ChiCTR1800016603.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8637016
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86370162021-12-03 Treatment of Dry Eye With Intracanalicular Injection of Hydroxybutyl Chitosan: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial Lin, Tong Wang, Wushuang Lu, Yang Gong, Lan Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine Background: Punctal/intracanalicular plugs on the market nowadays are all designed before clinical use in treating dry eye disease (DED). To provide an individualized lacrimal drainage system occlusion method and reduce the complications, we developed a “liquid plug” strategy by intracanalicular injection of hydroxybutyl chitosan (HBC) solution, a thermosensitive, phase-changing biomaterial. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the HBC plug in treating dry eye disease by comparing it with the VisiPlug absorbable intracanalicular plug. Methods: A monocenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial was performed. Fifty patients with DED were randomized 1:1 to undergo either the HBC injection treatment or the VisiPlug treatment. Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire, tear break-up time (TBUT), corneal fluorescence staining (CFS), tear meniscus height (TMH), and phenol red thread test were evaluated at Day 0 (baseline, before treatment) and Weeks 1, 4, and 12. Results: The two groups had a balanced baseline of age, gender, and DED-related characteristics. Both occlusion methods could relieve the symptoms and signs of DED. Significant improvement was found in OSDI, phenol red thread test, and tear meniscus height (P < 0.05 compared to baseline) but not in corneal fluorescence staining and tear break-up time (P > 0.05). There is no statistically significant difference between HBC injection and VisiPlug at Weeks 1 and 4 (P > 0.05). However, at week 12, the HBC injection was not as effective as the VisiPlug in maintaining phenol red thread test (HBC: 5.35 ± 3.22 mm, VisiPlug: 8.59 ± 4.35 mm, P = 0.009) and tear meniscus height (HBC: 206.9 ± 47.95 μm, VisiPlug: 242.59 ± 60.30 μm, P = 0.041). The numbers of ocular adverse events were relatively low in both groups. Conclusions: The HBC injection showed similar efficacy and safety compared to VisiPlug. The intracanalicular injection of HBC solution proves to be a promising, individualizing method to treat DED. Clinical Trial Registration: This study is registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (https://www.chictr.org.cn/enindex.aspx), Identifier: ChiCTR1800016603. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8637016/ /pubmed/34869486 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.769448 Text en Copyright © 2021 Lin, Wang, Lu and Gong. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Lin, Tong
Wang, Wushuang
Lu, Yang
Gong, Lan
Treatment of Dry Eye With Intracanalicular Injection of Hydroxybutyl Chitosan: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial
title Treatment of Dry Eye With Intracanalicular Injection of Hydroxybutyl Chitosan: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full Treatment of Dry Eye With Intracanalicular Injection of Hydroxybutyl Chitosan: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Treatment of Dry Eye With Intracanalicular Injection of Hydroxybutyl Chitosan: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Treatment of Dry Eye With Intracanalicular Injection of Hydroxybutyl Chitosan: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial
title_short Treatment of Dry Eye With Intracanalicular Injection of Hydroxybutyl Chitosan: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial
title_sort treatment of dry eye with intracanalicular injection of hydroxybutyl chitosan: a prospective randomized clinical trial
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8637016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34869486
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.769448
work_keys_str_mv AT lintong treatmentofdryeyewithintracanalicularinjectionofhydroxybutylchitosanaprospectiverandomizedclinicaltrial
AT wangwushuang treatmentofdryeyewithintracanalicularinjectionofhydroxybutylchitosanaprospectiverandomizedclinicaltrial
AT luyang treatmentofdryeyewithintracanalicularinjectionofhydroxybutylchitosanaprospectiverandomizedclinicaltrial
AT gonglan treatmentofdryeyewithintracanalicularinjectionofhydroxybutylchitosanaprospectiverandomizedclinicaltrial