Cargando…

The Reliability and Validity of Gluteal Endurance Measures (GEMs)

BACKGROUND: The gluteals have unique morphology related to muscle endurance, including moderate fiber sizes and a majority of Type I endurance fibers. Evidence suggests gluteal endurance is related to low back pain, running kinematics, balance, posture, and more. However, reliable and valid measures...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lehecka, B J, Smith, Barbara S, Rundell, Todd, Cappaert, Thomas A, Hakansson, Nils A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: NASMI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8637266/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34909251
http://dx.doi.org/10.26603/001c.29592
_version_ 1784608706390917120
author Lehecka, B J
Smith, Barbara S
Rundell, Todd
Cappaert, Thomas A
Hakansson, Nils A
author_facet Lehecka, B J
Smith, Barbara S
Rundell, Todd
Cappaert, Thomas A
Hakansson, Nils A
author_sort Lehecka, B J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The gluteals have unique morphology related to muscle endurance, including moderate fiber sizes and a majority of Type I endurance fibers. Evidence suggests gluteal endurance is related to low back pain, running kinematics, balance, posture, and more. However, reliable and valid measures specific to gluteal endurance are lacking in the literature. HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the intra- and inter-rater reliability of two gluteal endurance measures (GEMs) for clinical use. It also aimed to examine validity for the two measures by using electromyography (EMG), recording reasons for task failure, and analyzing differences between demographic groups. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-Sectional METHODS: Sixty-eight males and females with and without recurrent low back pain aged 18-35 years were recruited from a university population. Electromyography electrodes were placed on subjects’ gluteus maximus and gluteus medius, and each subject performed three trials of GEM-A (abduction endurance) and GEM-B (bridging endurance). Hold times, EMG median frequency (MF) data, and subjective reasons for task failure were analyzed. RESULTS: Both GEMs demonstrated high intra-rater reliability (ICC = 0.87-0.94) and inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.99). Mean hold times were 104.83 ± 34.11 seconds for GEM-A (abduction endurance) and 81.03 ± 24.79 seconds for GEM-B (bridging endurance). No statistically significant difference was found between subjects with and without recurrent LBP. Median frequency data validated the onset of gluteal fatigue during both measures. Posterolateral hip (gluteal) fatigue was reported as the primary reason for task failure in 93% and 86% of subjects for GEM-A and GEM-B, respectively. CONCLUSION: This seminal study of GEM-A (abduction endurance) and GEM-B (bridging endurance) found both measures to be reliable and valid measures of gluteal endurance. Further examination of the GEMs in samples with different types of LBP or hip pain is recommended. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8637266
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher NASMI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86372662021-12-13 The Reliability and Validity of Gluteal Endurance Measures (GEMs) Lehecka, B J Smith, Barbara S Rundell, Todd Cappaert, Thomas A Hakansson, Nils A Int J Sports Phys Ther Original Research BACKGROUND: The gluteals have unique morphology related to muscle endurance, including moderate fiber sizes and a majority of Type I endurance fibers. Evidence suggests gluteal endurance is related to low back pain, running kinematics, balance, posture, and more. However, reliable and valid measures specific to gluteal endurance are lacking in the literature. HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the intra- and inter-rater reliability of two gluteal endurance measures (GEMs) for clinical use. It also aimed to examine validity for the two measures by using electromyography (EMG), recording reasons for task failure, and analyzing differences between demographic groups. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-Sectional METHODS: Sixty-eight males and females with and without recurrent low back pain aged 18-35 years were recruited from a university population. Electromyography electrodes were placed on subjects’ gluteus maximus and gluteus medius, and each subject performed three trials of GEM-A (abduction endurance) and GEM-B (bridging endurance). Hold times, EMG median frequency (MF) data, and subjective reasons for task failure were analyzed. RESULTS: Both GEMs demonstrated high intra-rater reliability (ICC = 0.87-0.94) and inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.99). Mean hold times were 104.83 ± 34.11 seconds for GEM-A (abduction endurance) and 81.03 ± 24.79 seconds for GEM-B (bridging endurance). No statistically significant difference was found between subjects with and without recurrent LBP. Median frequency data validated the onset of gluteal fatigue during both measures. Posterolateral hip (gluteal) fatigue was reported as the primary reason for task failure in 93% and 86% of subjects for GEM-A and GEM-B, respectively. CONCLUSION: This seminal study of GEM-A (abduction endurance) and GEM-B (bridging endurance) found both measures to be reliable and valid measures of gluteal endurance. Further examination of the GEMs in samples with different types of LBP or hip pain is recommended. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 NASMI 2021-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8637266/ /pubmed/34909251 http://dx.doi.org/10.26603/001c.29592 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. If you remix, transform, or build upon this work, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
spellingShingle Original Research
Lehecka, B J
Smith, Barbara S
Rundell, Todd
Cappaert, Thomas A
Hakansson, Nils A
The Reliability and Validity of Gluteal Endurance Measures (GEMs)
title The Reliability and Validity of Gluteal Endurance Measures (GEMs)
title_full The Reliability and Validity of Gluteal Endurance Measures (GEMs)
title_fullStr The Reliability and Validity of Gluteal Endurance Measures (GEMs)
title_full_unstemmed The Reliability and Validity of Gluteal Endurance Measures (GEMs)
title_short The Reliability and Validity of Gluteal Endurance Measures (GEMs)
title_sort reliability and validity of gluteal endurance measures (gems)
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8637266/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34909251
http://dx.doi.org/10.26603/001c.29592
work_keys_str_mv AT leheckabj thereliabilityandvalidityofglutealendurancemeasuresgems
AT smithbarbaras thereliabilityandvalidityofglutealendurancemeasuresgems
AT rundelltodd thereliabilityandvalidityofglutealendurancemeasuresgems
AT cappaertthomasa thereliabilityandvalidityofglutealendurancemeasuresgems
AT hakanssonnilsa thereliabilityandvalidityofglutealendurancemeasuresgems
AT leheckabj reliabilityandvalidityofglutealendurancemeasuresgems
AT smithbarbaras reliabilityandvalidityofglutealendurancemeasuresgems
AT rundelltodd reliabilityandvalidityofglutealendurancemeasuresgems
AT cappaertthomasa reliabilityandvalidityofglutealendurancemeasuresgems
AT hakanssonnilsa reliabilityandvalidityofglutealendurancemeasuresgems