Cargando…

Bevacizumab versus placebo in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin as first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase II trial

BACKGROUND: The value of anti-angiogenesis antibody therapy in recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (R/M NPC) remains unknown. We carried out a phase II study to evaluate the addition of bevacizumab to paclitaxel plus carboplatin in R/M NPC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 80 patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, T., Yang, Y., Ma, S., Lin, L., Zhang, C., Ding, X., Wang, R., Feng, G., Chen, Y., Xu, R., Huang, Y., Zhang, L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8637468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34837744
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100313
_version_ 1784608746909990912
author Zhou, T.
Yang, Y.
Ma, S.
Lin, L.
Zhou, T.
Zhang, C.
Ding, X.
Wang, R.
Feng, G.
Chen, Y.
Xu, R.
Huang, Y.
Zhang, L.
author_facet Zhou, T.
Yang, Y.
Ma, S.
Lin, L.
Zhou, T.
Zhang, C.
Ding, X.
Wang, R.
Feng, G.
Chen, Y.
Xu, R.
Huang, Y.
Zhang, L.
author_sort Zhou, T.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The value of anti-angiogenesis antibody therapy in recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (R/M NPC) remains unknown. We carried out a phase II study to evaluate the addition of bevacizumab to paclitaxel plus carboplatin in R/M NPC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 80 patients with previously untreated R/M NPC were randomly assigned (1 : 1) to CPB or CP groups to receive carboplatin (area under the curve 6) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2)) intravenously every 3 weeks for a maximum of six cycles in combination with or without bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg), respectively. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) as per investigators, and the secondary endpoints were PFS as per independent review committee (IRC), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02250599). RESULTS: The median PFS as per investigators was 7.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 6.53-8.45 months] in the CPB group and 6.5 months (95% CI, 5.53-7.52 months) in the CP group (P = 0.148), which were similar to IRC-assessed PFS. The median OS was also alike between CPB and CP arms (21.0 versus 24.7 months; P = 0.326). ORRs were 87.2% and 72.5%, respectively (P = 0.105). However, the tumor-shrinking rate was higher in the CPB arm than in the CP arm (P = 0.035). No differences in grade 3 or higher adverse events between the groups were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of bevacizumab to paclitaxel plus carboplatin as first-line treatment did not prolong PFS and OS in patients with R/M NPC but improved tumor-shrinking rate. These results indicated that bevacizumab plus chemotherapy might be an optional choice for NPC with heavy tumor load or those pursuing short-term efficacy in neoadjuvant and concurrent chemotherapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8637468
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86374682021-12-09 Bevacizumab versus placebo in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin as first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase II trial Zhou, T. Yang, Y. Ma, S. Lin, L. Zhou, T. Zhang, C. Ding, X. Wang, R. Feng, G. Chen, Y. Xu, R. Huang, Y. Zhang, L. ESMO Open Original Research BACKGROUND: The value of anti-angiogenesis antibody therapy in recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (R/M NPC) remains unknown. We carried out a phase II study to evaluate the addition of bevacizumab to paclitaxel plus carboplatin in R/M NPC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 80 patients with previously untreated R/M NPC were randomly assigned (1 : 1) to CPB or CP groups to receive carboplatin (area under the curve 6) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2)) intravenously every 3 weeks for a maximum of six cycles in combination with or without bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg), respectively. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) as per investigators, and the secondary endpoints were PFS as per independent review committee (IRC), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02250599). RESULTS: The median PFS as per investigators was 7.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 6.53-8.45 months] in the CPB group and 6.5 months (95% CI, 5.53-7.52 months) in the CP group (P = 0.148), which were similar to IRC-assessed PFS. The median OS was also alike between CPB and CP arms (21.0 versus 24.7 months; P = 0.326). ORRs were 87.2% and 72.5%, respectively (P = 0.105). However, the tumor-shrinking rate was higher in the CPB arm than in the CP arm (P = 0.035). No differences in grade 3 or higher adverse events between the groups were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of bevacizumab to paclitaxel plus carboplatin as first-line treatment did not prolong PFS and OS in patients with R/M NPC but improved tumor-shrinking rate. These results indicated that bevacizumab plus chemotherapy might be an optional choice for NPC with heavy tumor load or those pursuing short-term efficacy in neoadjuvant and concurrent chemotherapy. Elsevier 2021-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8637468/ /pubmed/34837744 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100313 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Zhou, T.
Yang, Y.
Ma, S.
Lin, L.
Zhou, T.
Zhang, C.
Ding, X.
Wang, R.
Feng, G.
Chen, Y.
Xu, R.
Huang, Y.
Zhang, L.
Bevacizumab versus placebo in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin as first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase II trial
title Bevacizumab versus placebo in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin as first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase II trial
title_full Bevacizumab versus placebo in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin as first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase II trial
title_fullStr Bevacizumab versus placebo in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin as first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase II trial
title_full_unstemmed Bevacizumab versus placebo in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin as first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase II trial
title_short Bevacizumab versus placebo in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin as first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase II trial
title_sort bevacizumab versus placebo in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin as first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase ii trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8637468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34837744
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100313
work_keys_str_mv AT zhout bevacizumabversusplaceboincombinationwithpaclitaxelandcarboplatinasfirstlinetreatmentforrecurrentormetastaticnasopharyngealcarcinomaamulticentrerandomisedopenlabelphaseiitrial
AT yangy bevacizumabversusplaceboincombinationwithpaclitaxelandcarboplatinasfirstlinetreatmentforrecurrentormetastaticnasopharyngealcarcinomaamulticentrerandomisedopenlabelphaseiitrial
AT mas bevacizumabversusplaceboincombinationwithpaclitaxelandcarboplatinasfirstlinetreatmentforrecurrentormetastaticnasopharyngealcarcinomaamulticentrerandomisedopenlabelphaseiitrial
AT linl bevacizumabversusplaceboincombinationwithpaclitaxelandcarboplatinasfirstlinetreatmentforrecurrentormetastaticnasopharyngealcarcinomaamulticentrerandomisedopenlabelphaseiitrial
AT zhout bevacizumabversusplaceboincombinationwithpaclitaxelandcarboplatinasfirstlinetreatmentforrecurrentormetastaticnasopharyngealcarcinomaamulticentrerandomisedopenlabelphaseiitrial
AT zhangc bevacizumabversusplaceboincombinationwithpaclitaxelandcarboplatinasfirstlinetreatmentforrecurrentormetastaticnasopharyngealcarcinomaamulticentrerandomisedopenlabelphaseiitrial
AT dingx bevacizumabversusplaceboincombinationwithpaclitaxelandcarboplatinasfirstlinetreatmentforrecurrentormetastaticnasopharyngealcarcinomaamulticentrerandomisedopenlabelphaseiitrial
AT wangr bevacizumabversusplaceboincombinationwithpaclitaxelandcarboplatinasfirstlinetreatmentforrecurrentormetastaticnasopharyngealcarcinomaamulticentrerandomisedopenlabelphaseiitrial
AT fengg bevacizumabversusplaceboincombinationwithpaclitaxelandcarboplatinasfirstlinetreatmentforrecurrentormetastaticnasopharyngealcarcinomaamulticentrerandomisedopenlabelphaseiitrial
AT cheny bevacizumabversusplaceboincombinationwithpaclitaxelandcarboplatinasfirstlinetreatmentforrecurrentormetastaticnasopharyngealcarcinomaamulticentrerandomisedopenlabelphaseiitrial
AT xur bevacizumabversusplaceboincombinationwithpaclitaxelandcarboplatinasfirstlinetreatmentforrecurrentormetastaticnasopharyngealcarcinomaamulticentrerandomisedopenlabelphaseiitrial
AT huangy bevacizumabversusplaceboincombinationwithpaclitaxelandcarboplatinasfirstlinetreatmentforrecurrentormetastaticnasopharyngealcarcinomaamulticentrerandomisedopenlabelphaseiitrial
AT zhangl bevacizumabversusplaceboincombinationwithpaclitaxelandcarboplatinasfirstlinetreatmentforrecurrentormetastaticnasopharyngealcarcinomaamulticentrerandomisedopenlabelphaseiitrial