Cargando…

Structured patient interview to assess clinical outcomes in complicated urinary tract infections in the APEKS-cUTI study: pilot investigation

BACKGROUND: The APEKS-cUTI study demonstrated the non-inferiority of cefiderocol to imipenem−cilastatin in the primary endpoint of the composite of clinical and microbiological outcome in patients with complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs). We piloted a structured patient interview (SPI) to e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Portsmouth, Simon, Echols, Roger, Toyoizumi, Kiichiro, Tillotson, Glenn, Nagata, Tsutae Den
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8637798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34868583
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20499361211058257
_version_ 1784608819070894080
author Portsmouth, Simon
Echols, Roger
Toyoizumi, Kiichiro
Tillotson, Glenn
Nagata, Tsutae Den
author_facet Portsmouth, Simon
Echols, Roger
Toyoizumi, Kiichiro
Tillotson, Glenn
Nagata, Tsutae Den
author_sort Portsmouth, Simon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The APEKS-cUTI study demonstrated the non-inferiority of cefiderocol to imipenem−cilastatin in the primary endpoint of the composite of clinical and microbiological outcome in patients with complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs). We piloted a structured patient interview (SPI) to evaluate clinical outcomes based on patient-reported symptoms while conducting this pivotal randomized, double-blind, phase-2 study. The objectives were to assess the value of the SPI, using its performance relative to physician assessment, and also to strengthen the value of patient-reported measures in conducting clinical trials for cUTI treatment. METHODS: In addition to the protocol-defined clinical and microbiological outcomes, patients randomized in the APEKS-cUTI study were interviewed by the investigator or qualified study personnel at screening/baseline, early assessment (EA), end of treatment (EOT), test of cure (TOC), and follow-up (FUP). The 14-element questionnaire graded cUTI symptoms as absent or present, and if present, as mild, moderate, or severe. Changes in post-baseline symptoms based on patients’ responses were rated by the interviewer. The overall clinical outcome was evaluated based on the responses provided by patients at each time point. RESULTS: Among the 371 patients in the modified intention-to-treat population, the rate of SPI completion in each treatment arm exceeded 90% at each time point. SPI-assessed clinical cure rates were 89.7% in the cefiderocol arm and 84.9% in the imipenem–cilastatin arm. There was substantial agreement between SPI evaluation and investigator global assessment of clinical outcome at TOC and FUP, with lower agreement at EA and EOT. CONCLUSION: This analysis suggests that patient-reported symptoms can be effectively captured in hospitalized patients with cUTI in a clinical trial setting. Development of a validated patient-reported outcome for use in such a setting is warranted. REGISTRATION: NCT02321800 (registered on 22 December 2014).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8637798
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86377982021-12-03 Structured patient interview to assess clinical outcomes in complicated urinary tract infections in the APEKS-cUTI study: pilot investigation Portsmouth, Simon Echols, Roger Toyoizumi, Kiichiro Tillotson, Glenn Nagata, Tsutae Den Ther Adv Infect Dis Original Research BACKGROUND: The APEKS-cUTI study demonstrated the non-inferiority of cefiderocol to imipenem−cilastatin in the primary endpoint of the composite of clinical and microbiological outcome in patients with complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs). We piloted a structured patient interview (SPI) to evaluate clinical outcomes based on patient-reported symptoms while conducting this pivotal randomized, double-blind, phase-2 study. The objectives were to assess the value of the SPI, using its performance relative to physician assessment, and also to strengthen the value of patient-reported measures in conducting clinical trials for cUTI treatment. METHODS: In addition to the protocol-defined clinical and microbiological outcomes, patients randomized in the APEKS-cUTI study were interviewed by the investigator or qualified study personnel at screening/baseline, early assessment (EA), end of treatment (EOT), test of cure (TOC), and follow-up (FUP). The 14-element questionnaire graded cUTI symptoms as absent or present, and if present, as mild, moderate, or severe. Changes in post-baseline symptoms based on patients’ responses were rated by the interviewer. The overall clinical outcome was evaluated based on the responses provided by patients at each time point. RESULTS: Among the 371 patients in the modified intention-to-treat population, the rate of SPI completion in each treatment arm exceeded 90% at each time point. SPI-assessed clinical cure rates were 89.7% in the cefiderocol arm and 84.9% in the imipenem–cilastatin arm. There was substantial agreement between SPI evaluation and investigator global assessment of clinical outcome at TOC and FUP, with lower agreement at EA and EOT. CONCLUSION: This analysis suggests that patient-reported symptoms can be effectively captured in hospitalized patients with cUTI in a clinical trial setting. Development of a validated patient-reported outcome for use in such a setting is warranted. REGISTRATION: NCT02321800 (registered on 22 December 2014). SAGE Publications 2021-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8637798/ /pubmed/34868583 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20499361211058257 Text en © The Author(s), 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Portsmouth, Simon
Echols, Roger
Toyoizumi, Kiichiro
Tillotson, Glenn
Nagata, Tsutae Den
Structured patient interview to assess clinical outcomes in complicated urinary tract infections in the APEKS-cUTI study: pilot investigation
title Structured patient interview to assess clinical outcomes in complicated urinary tract infections in the APEKS-cUTI study: pilot investigation
title_full Structured patient interview to assess clinical outcomes in complicated urinary tract infections in the APEKS-cUTI study: pilot investigation
title_fullStr Structured patient interview to assess clinical outcomes in complicated urinary tract infections in the APEKS-cUTI study: pilot investigation
title_full_unstemmed Structured patient interview to assess clinical outcomes in complicated urinary tract infections in the APEKS-cUTI study: pilot investigation
title_short Structured patient interview to assess clinical outcomes in complicated urinary tract infections in the APEKS-cUTI study: pilot investigation
title_sort structured patient interview to assess clinical outcomes in complicated urinary tract infections in the apeks-cuti study: pilot investigation
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8637798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34868583
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20499361211058257
work_keys_str_mv AT portsmouthsimon structuredpatientinterviewtoassessclinicaloutcomesincomplicatedurinarytractinfectionsintheapekscutistudypilotinvestigation
AT echolsroger structuredpatientinterviewtoassessclinicaloutcomesincomplicatedurinarytractinfectionsintheapekscutistudypilotinvestigation
AT toyoizumikiichiro structuredpatientinterviewtoassessclinicaloutcomesincomplicatedurinarytractinfectionsintheapekscutistudypilotinvestigation
AT tillotsonglenn structuredpatientinterviewtoassessclinicaloutcomesincomplicatedurinarytractinfectionsintheapekscutistudypilotinvestigation
AT nagatatsutaeden structuredpatientinterviewtoassessclinicaloutcomesincomplicatedurinarytractinfectionsintheapekscutistudypilotinvestigation