Cargando…

Machine Learning for Head and Neck Cancer: A Safe Bet?—A Clinically Oriented Systematic Review for the Radiation Oncologist

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Machine learning (ML) is emerging as a feasible approach to optimize patients’ care path in Radiation Oncology. Applications include autosegmentation, treatment planning optimization, and prediction of oncological and toxicity outcomes. The purpose of this clinically oriented...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Volpe, Stefania, Pepa, Matteo, Zaffaroni, Mattia, Bellerba, Federica, Santamaria, Riccardo, Marvaso, Giulia, Isaksson, Lars Johannes, Gandini, Sara, Starzyńska, Anna, Leonardi, Maria Cristina, Orecchia, Roberto, Alterio, Daniela, Jereczek-Fossa, Barbara Alicja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8637856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34869010
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.772663
_version_ 1784608831855132672
author Volpe, Stefania
Pepa, Matteo
Zaffaroni, Mattia
Bellerba, Federica
Santamaria, Riccardo
Marvaso, Giulia
Isaksson, Lars Johannes
Gandini, Sara
Starzyńska, Anna
Leonardi, Maria Cristina
Orecchia, Roberto
Alterio, Daniela
Jereczek-Fossa, Barbara Alicja
author_facet Volpe, Stefania
Pepa, Matteo
Zaffaroni, Mattia
Bellerba, Federica
Santamaria, Riccardo
Marvaso, Giulia
Isaksson, Lars Johannes
Gandini, Sara
Starzyńska, Anna
Leonardi, Maria Cristina
Orecchia, Roberto
Alterio, Daniela
Jereczek-Fossa, Barbara Alicja
author_sort Volpe, Stefania
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Machine learning (ML) is emerging as a feasible approach to optimize patients’ care path in Radiation Oncology. Applications include autosegmentation, treatment planning optimization, and prediction of oncological and toxicity outcomes. The purpose of this clinically oriented systematic review is to illustrate the potential and limitations of the most commonly used ML models in solving everyday clinical issues in head and neck cancer (HNC) radiotherapy (RT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Electronic databases were screened up to May 2021. Studies dealing with ML and radiomics were considered eligible. The quality of the included studies was rated by an adapted version of the qualitative checklist originally developed by Luo et al. All statistical analyses were performed using R version 3.6.1. RESULTS: Forty-eight studies (21 on autosegmentation, four on treatment planning, 12 on oncological outcome prediction, 10 on toxicity prediction, and one on determinants of postoperative RT) were included in the analysis. The most common imaging modality was computed tomography (CT) (40%) followed by magnetic resonance (MR) (10%). Quantitative image features were considered in nine studies (19%). No significant differences were identified in global and methodological scores when works were stratified per their task (i.e., autosegmentation). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The range of possible applications of ML in the field of HN Radiation Oncology is wide, albeit this area of research is relatively young. Overall, if not safe yet, ML is most probably a bet worth making.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8637856
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86378562021-12-03 Machine Learning for Head and Neck Cancer: A Safe Bet?—A Clinically Oriented Systematic Review for the Radiation Oncologist Volpe, Stefania Pepa, Matteo Zaffaroni, Mattia Bellerba, Federica Santamaria, Riccardo Marvaso, Giulia Isaksson, Lars Johannes Gandini, Sara Starzyńska, Anna Leonardi, Maria Cristina Orecchia, Roberto Alterio, Daniela Jereczek-Fossa, Barbara Alicja Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Machine learning (ML) is emerging as a feasible approach to optimize patients’ care path in Radiation Oncology. Applications include autosegmentation, treatment planning optimization, and prediction of oncological and toxicity outcomes. The purpose of this clinically oriented systematic review is to illustrate the potential and limitations of the most commonly used ML models in solving everyday clinical issues in head and neck cancer (HNC) radiotherapy (RT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Electronic databases were screened up to May 2021. Studies dealing with ML and radiomics were considered eligible. The quality of the included studies was rated by an adapted version of the qualitative checklist originally developed by Luo et al. All statistical analyses were performed using R version 3.6.1. RESULTS: Forty-eight studies (21 on autosegmentation, four on treatment planning, 12 on oncological outcome prediction, 10 on toxicity prediction, and one on determinants of postoperative RT) were included in the analysis. The most common imaging modality was computed tomography (CT) (40%) followed by magnetic resonance (MR) (10%). Quantitative image features were considered in nine studies (19%). No significant differences were identified in global and methodological scores when works were stratified per their task (i.e., autosegmentation). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The range of possible applications of ML in the field of HN Radiation Oncology is wide, albeit this area of research is relatively young. Overall, if not safe yet, ML is most probably a bet worth making. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8637856/ /pubmed/34869010 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.772663 Text en Copyright © 2021 Volpe, Pepa, Zaffaroni, Bellerba, Santamaria, Marvaso, Isaksson, Gandini, Starzyńska, Leonardi, Orecchia, Alterio and Jereczek-Fossa https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Volpe, Stefania
Pepa, Matteo
Zaffaroni, Mattia
Bellerba, Federica
Santamaria, Riccardo
Marvaso, Giulia
Isaksson, Lars Johannes
Gandini, Sara
Starzyńska, Anna
Leonardi, Maria Cristina
Orecchia, Roberto
Alterio, Daniela
Jereczek-Fossa, Barbara Alicja
Machine Learning for Head and Neck Cancer: A Safe Bet?—A Clinically Oriented Systematic Review for the Radiation Oncologist
title Machine Learning for Head and Neck Cancer: A Safe Bet?—A Clinically Oriented Systematic Review for the Radiation Oncologist
title_full Machine Learning for Head and Neck Cancer: A Safe Bet?—A Clinically Oriented Systematic Review for the Radiation Oncologist
title_fullStr Machine Learning for Head and Neck Cancer: A Safe Bet?—A Clinically Oriented Systematic Review for the Radiation Oncologist
title_full_unstemmed Machine Learning for Head and Neck Cancer: A Safe Bet?—A Clinically Oriented Systematic Review for the Radiation Oncologist
title_short Machine Learning for Head and Neck Cancer: A Safe Bet?—A Clinically Oriented Systematic Review for the Radiation Oncologist
title_sort machine learning for head and neck cancer: a safe bet?—a clinically oriented systematic review for the radiation oncologist
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8637856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34869010
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.772663
work_keys_str_mv AT volpestefania machinelearningforheadandneckcancerasafebetaclinicallyorientedsystematicreviewfortheradiationoncologist
AT pepamatteo machinelearningforheadandneckcancerasafebetaclinicallyorientedsystematicreviewfortheradiationoncologist
AT zaffaronimattia machinelearningforheadandneckcancerasafebetaclinicallyorientedsystematicreviewfortheradiationoncologist
AT bellerbafederica machinelearningforheadandneckcancerasafebetaclinicallyorientedsystematicreviewfortheradiationoncologist
AT santamariariccardo machinelearningforheadandneckcancerasafebetaclinicallyorientedsystematicreviewfortheradiationoncologist
AT marvasogiulia machinelearningforheadandneckcancerasafebetaclinicallyorientedsystematicreviewfortheradiationoncologist
AT isakssonlarsjohannes machinelearningforheadandneckcancerasafebetaclinicallyorientedsystematicreviewfortheradiationoncologist
AT gandinisara machinelearningforheadandneckcancerasafebetaclinicallyorientedsystematicreviewfortheradiationoncologist
AT starzynskaanna machinelearningforheadandneckcancerasafebetaclinicallyorientedsystematicreviewfortheradiationoncologist
AT leonardimariacristina machinelearningforheadandneckcancerasafebetaclinicallyorientedsystematicreviewfortheradiationoncologist
AT orecchiaroberto machinelearningforheadandneckcancerasafebetaclinicallyorientedsystematicreviewfortheradiationoncologist
AT alteriodaniela machinelearningforheadandneckcancerasafebetaclinicallyorientedsystematicreviewfortheradiationoncologist
AT jereczekfossabarbaraalicja machinelearningforheadandneckcancerasafebetaclinicallyorientedsystematicreviewfortheradiationoncologist