Cargando…
Machine Learning for Head and Neck Cancer: A Safe Bet?—A Clinically Oriented Systematic Review for the Radiation Oncologist
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Machine learning (ML) is emerging as a feasible approach to optimize patients’ care path in Radiation Oncology. Applications include autosegmentation, treatment planning optimization, and prediction of oncological and toxicity outcomes. The purpose of this clinically oriented...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8637856/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34869010 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.772663 |
_version_ | 1784608831855132672 |
---|---|
author | Volpe, Stefania Pepa, Matteo Zaffaroni, Mattia Bellerba, Federica Santamaria, Riccardo Marvaso, Giulia Isaksson, Lars Johannes Gandini, Sara Starzyńska, Anna Leonardi, Maria Cristina Orecchia, Roberto Alterio, Daniela Jereczek-Fossa, Barbara Alicja |
author_facet | Volpe, Stefania Pepa, Matteo Zaffaroni, Mattia Bellerba, Federica Santamaria, Riccardo Marvaso, Giulia Isaksson, Lars Johannes Gandini, Sara Starzyńska, Anna Leonardi, Maria Cristina Orecchia, Roberto Alterio, Daniela Jereczek-Fossa, Barbara Alicja |
author_sort | Volpe, Stefania |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Machine learning (ML) is emerging as a feasible approach to optimize patients’ care path in Radiation Oncology. Applications include autosegmentation, treatment planning optimization, and prediction of oncological and toxicity outcomes. The purpose of this clinically oriented systematic review is to illustrate the potential and limitations of the most commonly used ML models in solving everyday clinical issues in head and neck cancer (HNC) radiotherapy (RT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Electronic databases were screened up to May 2021. Studies dealing with ML and radiomics were considered eligible. The quality of the included studies was rated by an adapted version of the qualitative checklist originally developed by Luo et al. All statistical analyses were performed using R version 3.6.1. RESULTS: Forty-eight studies (21 on autosegmentation, four on treatment planning, 12 on oncological outcome prediction, 10 on toxicity prediction, and one on determinants of postoperative RT) were included in the analysis. The most common imaging modality was computed tomography (CT) (40%) followed by magnetic resonance (MR) (10%). Quantitative image features were considered in nine studies (19%). No significant differences were identified in global and methodological scores when works were stratified per their task (i.e., autosegmentation). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The range of possible applications of ML in the field of HN Radiation Oncology is wide, albeit this area of research is relatively young. Overall, if not safe yet, ML is most probably a bet worth making. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8637856 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86378562021-12-03 Machine Learning for Head and Neck Cancer: A Safe Bet?—A Clinically Oriented Systematic Review for the Radiation Oncologist Volpe, Stefania Pepa, Matteo Zaffaroni, Mattia Bellerba, Federica Santamaria, Riccardo Marvaso, Giulia Isaksson, Lars Johannes Gandini, Sara Starzyńska, Anna Leonardi, Maria Cristina Orecchia, Roberto Alterio, Daniela Jereczek-Fossa, Barbara Alicja Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Machine learning (ML) is emerging as a feasible approach to optimize patients’ care path in Radiation Oncology. Applications include autosegmentation, treatment planning optimization, and prediction of oncological and toxicity outcomes. The purpose of this clinically oriented systematic review is to illustrate the potential and limitations of the most commonly used ML models in solving everyday clinical issues in head and neck cancer (HNC) radiotherapy (RT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Electronic databases were screened up to May 2021. Studies dealing with ML and radiomics were considered eligible. The quality of the included studies was rated by an adapted version of the qualitative checklist originally developed by Luo et al. All statistical analyses were performed using R version 3.6.1. RESULTS: Forty-eight studies (21 on autosegmentation, four on treatment planning, 12 on oncological outcome prediction, 10 on toxicity prediction, and one on determinants of postoperative RT) were included in the analysis. The most common imaging modality was computed tomography (CT) (40%) followed by magnetic resonance (MR) (10%). Quantitative image features were considered in nine studies (19%). No significant differences were identified in global and methodological scores when works were stratified per their task (i.e., autosegmentation). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The range of possible applications of ML in the field of HN Radiation Oncology is wide, albeit this area of research is relatively young. Overall, if not safe yet, ML is most probably a bet worth making. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8637856/ /pubmed/34869010 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.772663 Text en Copyright © 2021 Volpe, Pepa, Zaffaroni, Bellerba, Santamaria, Marvaso, Isaksson, Gandini, Starzyńska, Leonardi, Orecchia, Alterio and Jereczek-Fossa https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Volpe, Stefania Pepa, Matteo Zaffaroni, Mattia Bellerba, Federica Santamaria, Riccardo Marvaso, Giulia Isaksson, Lars Johannes Gandini, Sara Starzyńska, Anna Leonardi, Maria Cristina Orecchia, Roberto Alterio, Daniela Jereczek-Fossa, Barbara Alicja Machine Learning for Head and Neck Cancer: A Safe Bet?—A Clinically Oriented Systematic Review for the Radiation Oncologist |
title | Machine Learning for Head and Neck Cancer: A Safe Bet?—A Clinically Oriented Systematic Review for the Radiation Oncologist |
title_full | Machine Learning for Head and Neck Cancer: A Safe Bet?—A Clinically Oriented Systematic Review for the Radiation Oncologist |
title_fullStr | Machine Learning for Head and Neck Cancer: A Safe Bet?—A Clinically Oriented Systematic Review for the Radiation Oncologist |
title_full_unstemmed | Machine Learning for Head and Neck Cancer: A Safe Bet?—A Clinically Oriented Systematic Review for the Radiation Oncologist |
title_short | Machine Learning for Head and Neck Cancer: A Safe Bet?—A Clinically Oriented Systematic Review for the Radiation Oncologist |
title_sort | machine learning for head and neck cancer: a safe bet?—a clinically oriented systematic review for the radiation oncologist |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8637856/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34869010 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.772663 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT volpestefania machinelearningforheadandneckcancerasafebetaclinicallyorientedsystematicreviewfortheradiationoncologist AT pepamatteo machinelearningforheadandneckcancerasafebetaclinicallyorientedsystematicreviewfortheradiationoncologist AT zaffaronimattia machinelearningforheadandneckcancerasafebetaclinicallyorientedsystematicreviewfortheradiationoncologist AT bellerbafederica machinelearningforheadandneckcancerasafebetaclinicallyorientedsystematicreviewfortheradiationoncologist AT santamariariccardo machinelearningforheadandneckcancerasafebetaclinicallyorientedsystematicreviewfortheradiationoncologist AT marvasogiulia machinelearningforheadandneckcancerasafebetaclinicallyorientedsystematicreviewfortheradiationoncologist AT isakssonlarsjohannes machinelearningforheadandneckcancerasafebetaclinicallyorientedsystematicreviewfortheradiationoncologist AT gandinisara machinelearningforheadandneckcancerasafebetaclinicallyorientedsystematicreviewfortheradiationoncologist AT starzynskaanna machinelearningforheadandneckcancerasafebetaclinicallyorientedsystematicreviewfortheradiationoncologist AT leonardimariacristina machinelearningforheadandneckcancerasafebetaclinicallyorientedsystematicreviewfortheradiationoncologist AT orecchiaroberto machinelearningforheadandneckcancerasafebetaclinicallyorientedsystematicreviewfortheradiationoncologist AT alteriodaniela machinelearningforheadandneckcancerasafebetaclinicallyorientedsystematicreviewfortheradiationoncologist AT jereczekfossabarbaraalicja machinelearningforheadandneckcancerasafebetaclinicallyorientedsystematicreviewfortheradiationoncologist |