Cargando…

Mitochondrial DNA Content May Not Be a Reliable Screening Biomarker for Live Birth After Single Euploid Blastocyst Transfer

An increasing number of studies have related the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) content to embryo viability and transfer outcomes. However, previous studies have focused more on the relationship between mtDNA and embryo implantation, few studies have studied the effect of the mtDNA content on live birth....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Xuanyou, Liu, Xueli, Shi, Weihui, Ye, Mujin, Chen, Songchang, Xu, Chenming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8637898/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34867804
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.762976
_version_ 1784608840934752256
author Zhou, Xuanyou
Liu, Xueli
Shi, Weihui
Ye, Mujin
Chen, Songchang
Xu, Chenming
author_facet Zhou, Xuanyou
Liu, Xueli
Shi, Weihui
Ye, Mujin
Chen, Songchang
Xu, Chenming
author_sort Zhou, Xuanyou
collection PubMed
description An increasing number of studies have related the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) content to embryo viability and transfer outcomes. However, previous studies have focused more on the relationship between mtDNA and embryo implantation, few studies have studied the effect of the mtDNA content on live birth. In the study, we investigated whether mtDNA content is a reliable screening biomarker for live birth after single blastocyst transfer. A total of 233 couples with 316 blastocyst stage embryos undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment and pre-implantation genetic testing analysis were included in the study. All embryos were chromosomally normal and had undergone single-embryo transfers. There was no significant difference observed in the blastocyst mtDNA content among the live birth, miscarriage and non-implanted groups (p=0.999), and the mtDNA content in blastocysts from the miscarriage and live birth groups was similar [median (interquartile range), 1.00*10(8)(7.59*10(7)- 1.39*10(8)) vs 1.01*10(8) (7.37*10(7)- 1.32*10(8))]. Similarly, no significant association was observed between mtDNA content and embryo implantation potential (p=0.965). After adjusting for multiple confounders in a logistic regression analysis with generalized estimating equations, no associations between mtDNA content and live birth were observed in all blastocysts, Day-5 and Day-6 blastocysts (p=0.567, p=0.673, p=0.165, respectively). The live birth rate was not significantly different between blastocysts with an elevated mtDNA content and blastocysts with a normal mtDNA content (26.7% vs 33.6% p=0.780). Additionally, there was no linear correlation between the mtDNA content and maternal age (p=0.570). In conclusion, the mtDNA content does not seem to be a potential biomarker for embryo transfer outcomes (i.e., implantation and live birth) based on the existing testing tools. Embryos with an elevated mtDNA content also have development potential for successful live birth.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8637898
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86378982021-12-03 Mitochondrial DNA Content May Not Be a Reliable Screening Biomarker for Live Birth After Single Euploid Blastocyst Transfer Zhou, Xuanyou Liu, Xueli Shi, Weihui Ye, Mujin Chen, Songchang Xu, Chenming Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology An increasing number of studies have related the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) content to embryo viability and transfer outcomes. However, previous studies have focused more on the relationship between mtDNA and embryo implantation, few studies have studied the effect of the mtDNA content on live birth. In the study, we investigated whether mtDNA content is a reliable screening biomarker for live birth after single blastocyst transfer. A total of 233 couples with 316 blastocyst stage embryos undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment and pre-implantation genetic testing analysis were included in the study. All embryos were chromosomally normal and had undergone single-embryo transfers. There was no significant difference observed in the blastocyst mtDNA content among the live birth, miscarriage and non-implanted groups (p=0.999), and the mtDNA content in blastocysts from the miscarriage and live birth groups was similar [median (interquartile range), 1.00*10(8)(7.59*10(7)- 1.39*10(8)) vs 1.01*10(8) (7.37*10(7)- 1.32*10(8))]. Similarly, no significant association was observed between mtDNA content and embryo implantation potential (p=0.965). After adjusting for multiple confounders in a logistic regression analysis with generalized estimating equations, no associations between mtDNA content and live birth were observed in all blastocysts, Day-5 and Day-6 blastocysts (p=0.567, p=0.673, p=0.165, respectively). The live birth rate was not significantly different between blastocysts with an elevated mtDNA content and blastocysts with a normal mtDNA content (26.7% vs 33.6% p=0.780). Additionally, there was no linear correlation between the mtDNA content and maternal age (p=0.570). In conclusion, the mtDNA content does not seem to be a potential biomarker for embryo transfer outcomes (i.e., implantation and live birth) based on the existing testing tools. Embryos with an elevated mtDNA content also have development potential for successful live birth. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8637898/ /pubmed/34867804 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.762976 Text en Copyright © 2021 Zhou, Liu, Shi, Ye, Chen and Xu https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Endocrinology
Zhou, Xuanyou
Liu, Xueli
Shi, Weihui
Ye, Mujin
Chen, Songchang
Xu, Chenming
Mitochondrial DNA Content May Not Be a Reliable Screening Biomarker for Live Birth After Single Euploid Blastocyst Transfer
title Mitochondrial DNA Content May Not Be a Reliable Screening Biomarker for Live Birth After Single Euploid Blastocyst Transfer
title_full Mitochondrial DNA Content May Not Be a Reliable Screening Biomarker for Live Birth After Single Euploid Blastocyst Transfer
title_fullStr Mitochondrial DNA Content May Not Be a Reliable Screening Biomarker for Live Birth After Single Euploid Blastocyst Transfer
title_full_unstemmed Mitochondrial DNA Content May Not Be a Reliable Screening Biomarker for Live Birth After Single Euploid Blastocyst Transfer
title_short Mitochondrial DNA Content May Not Be a Reliable Screening Biomarker for Live Birth After Single Euploid Blastocyst Transfer
title_sort mitochondrial dna content may not be a reliable screening biomarker for live birth after single euploid blastocyst transfer
topic Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8637898/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34867804
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.762976
work_keys_str_mv AT zhouxuanyou mitochondrialdnacontentmaynotbeareliablescreeningbiomarkerforlivebirthaftersingleeuploidblastocysttransfer
AT liuxueli mitochondrialdnacontentmaynotbeareliablescreeningbiomarkerforlivebirthaftersingleeuploidblastocysttransfer
AT shiweihui mitochondrialdnacontentmaynotbeareliablescreeningbiomarkerforlivebirthaftersingleeuploidblastocysttransfer
AT yemujin mitochondrialdnacontentmaynotbeareliablescreeningbiomarkerforlivebirthaftersingleeuploidblastocysttransfer
AT chensongchang mitochondrialdnacontentmaynotbeareliablescreeningbiomarkerforlivebirthaftersingleeuploidblastocysttransfer
AT xuchenming mitochondrialdnacontentmaynotbeareliablescreeningbiomarkerforlivebirthaftersingleeuploidblastocysttransfer