Cargando…
Mitochondrial DNA Content May Not Be a Reliable Screening Biomarker for Live Birth After Single Euploid Blastocyst Transfer
An increasing number of studies have related the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) content to embryo viability and transfer outcomes. However, previous studies have focused more on the relationship between mtDNA and embryo implantation, few studies have studied the effect of the mtDNA content on live birth....
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8637898/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34867804 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.762976 |
_version_ | 1784608840934752256 |
---|---|
author | Zhou, Xuanyou Liu, Xueli Shi, Weihui Ye, Mujin Chen, Songchang Xu, Chenming |
author_facet | Zhou, Xuanyou Liu, Xueli Shi, Weihui Ye, Mujin Chen, Songchang Xu, Chenming |
author_sort | Zhou, Xuanyou |
collection | PubMed |
description | An increasing number of studies have related the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) content to embryo viability and transfer outcomes. However, previous studies have focused more on the relationship between mtDNA and embryo implantation, few studies have studied the effect of the mtDNA content on live birth. In the study, we investigated whether mtDNA content is a reliable screening biomarker for live birth after single blastocyst transfer. A total of 233 couples with 316 blastocyst stage embryos undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment and pre-implantation genetic testing analysis were included in the study. All embryos were chromosomally normal and had undergone single-embryo transfers. There was no significant difference observed in the blastocyst mtDNA content among the live birth, miscarriage and non-implanted groups (p=0.999), and the mtDNA content in blastocysts from the miscarriage and live birth groups was similar [median (interquartile range), 1.00*10(8)(7.59*10(7)- 1.39*10(8)) vs 1.01*10(8) (7.37*10(7)- 1.32*10(8))]. Similarly, no significant association was observed between mtDNA content and embryo implantation potential (p=0.965). After adjusting for multiple confounders in a logistic regression analysis with generalized estimating equations, no associations between mtDNA content and live birth were observed in all blastocysts, Day-5 and Day-6 blastocysts (p=0.567, p=0.673, p=0.165, respectively). The live birth rate was not significantly different between blastocysts with an elevated mtDNA content and blastocysts with a normal mtDNA content (26.7% vs 33.6% p=0.780). Additionally, there was no linear correlation between the mtDNA content and maternal age (p=0.570). In conclusion, the mtDNA content does not seem to be a potential biomarker for embryo transfer outcomes (i.e., implantation and live birth) based on the existing testing tools. Embryos with an elevated mtDNA content also have development potential for successful live birth. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8637898 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86378982021-12-03 Mitochondrial DNA Content May Not Be a Reliable Screening Biomarker for Live Birth After Single Euploid Blastocyst Transfer Zhou, Xuanyou Liu, Xueli Shi, Weihui Ye, Mujin Chen, Songchang Xu, Chenming Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology An increasing number of studies have related the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) content to embryo viability and transfer outcomes. However, previous studies have focused more on the relationship between mtDNA and embryo implantation, few studies have studied the effect of the mtDNA content on live birth. In the study, we investigated whether mtDNA content is a reliable screening biomarker for live birth after single blastocyst transfer. A total of 233 couples with 316 blastocyst stage embryos undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment and pre-implantation genetic testing analysis were included in the study. All embryos were chromosomally normal and had undergone single-embryo transfers. There was no significant difference observed in the blastocyst mtDNA content among the live birth, miscarriage and non-implanted groups (p=0.999), and the mtDNA content in blastocysts from the miscarriage and live birth groups was similar [median (interquartile range), 1.00*10(8)(7.59*10(7)- 1.39*10(8)) vs 1.01*10(8) (7.37*10(7)- 1.32*10(8))]. Similarly, no significant association was observed between mtDNA content and embryo implantation potential (p=0.965). After adjusting for multiple confounders in a logistic regression analysis with generalized estimating equations, no associations between mtDNA content and live birth were observed in all blastocysts, Day-5 and Day-6 blastocysts (p=0.567, p=0.673, p=0.165, respectively). The live birth rate was not significantly different between blastocysts with an elevated mtDNA content and blastocysts with a normal mtDNA content (26.7% vs 33.6% p=0.780). Additionally, there was no linear correlation between the mtDNA content and maternal age (p=0.570). In conclusion, the mtDNA content does not seem to be a potential biomarker for embryo transfer outcomes (i.e., implantation and live birth) based on the existing testing tools. Embryos with an elevated mtDNA content also have development potential for successful live birth. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8637898/ /pubmed/34867804 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.762976 Text en Copyright © 2021 Zhou, Liu, Shi, Ye, Chen and Xu https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Endocrinology Zhou, Xuanyou Liu, Xueli Shi, Weihui Ye, Mujin Chen, Songchang Xu, Chenming Mitochondrial DNA Content May Not Be a Reliable Screening Biomarker for Live Birth After Single Euploid Blastocyst Transfer |
title | Mitochondrial DNA Content May Not Be a Reliable Screening Biomarker for Live Birth After Single Euploid Blastocyst Transfer |
title_full | Mitochondrial DNA Content May Not Be a Reliable Screening Biomarker for Live Birth After Single Euploid Blastocyst Transfer |
title_fullStr | Mitochondrial DNA Content May Not Be a Reliable Screening Biomarker for Live Birth After Single Euploid Blastocyst Transfer |
title_full_unstemmed | Mitochondrial DNA Content May Not Be a Reliable Screening Biomarker for Live Birth After Single Euploid Blastocyst Transfer |
title_short | Mitochondrial DNA Content May Not Be a Reliable Screening Biomarker for Live Birth After Single Euploid Blastocyst Transfer |
title_sort | mitochondrial dna content may not be a reliable screening biomarker for live birth after single euploid blastocyst transfer |
topic | Endocrinology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8637898/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34867804 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.762976 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhouxuanyou mitochondrialdnacontentmaynotbeareliablescreeningbiomarkerforlivebirthaftersingleeuploidblastocysttransfer AT liuxueli mitochondrialdnacontentmaynotbeareliablescreeningbiomarkerforlivebirthaftersingleeuploidblastocysttransfer AT shiweihui mitochondrialdnacontentmaynotbeareliablescreeningbiomarkerforlivebirthaftersingleeuploidblastocysttransfer AT yemujin mitochondrialdnacontentmaynotbeareliablescreeningbiomarkerforlivebirthaftersingleeuploidblastocysttransfer AT chensongchang mitochondrialdnacontentmaynotbeareliablescreeningbiomarkerforlivebirthaftersingleeuploidblastocysttransfer AT xuchenming mitochondrialdnacontentmaynotbeareliablescreeningbiomarkerforlivebirthaftersingleeuploidblastocysttransfer |