Cargando…

Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm with skin and bone marrow involvement: Report of three cases

BACKGROUND: Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) is a rare and highly aggressive hematopoietic malignancy. BPDCN is difficult to diagnose because of the overlap in morphologic and immunophenotypic features with various cutaneous lymphatic hematopoietic tumors. CASE SUMMARY: We report...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guo, Jiang-Hong, Zhang, Hong-Wei, Wang, Li, Bai, Wei, Wang, Jin-Fen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8638054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34904102
http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i33.10293
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) is a rare and highly aggressive hematopoietic malignancy. BPDCN is difficult to diagnose because of the overlap in morphologic and immunophenotypic features with various cutaneous lymphatic hematopoietic tumors. CASE SUMMARY: We report on three BPDCN cases, all characterized by skin nodules and examined by histology, immunohistochemical detection, in situ hybridization for Epstein-Barr virus, and follow-up. We also review the relevant literature. All patients were positive for CD56 and negative for Epstein-Barr encoded small RNA. Two patients had bone marrow involvement. Chemotherapy is the main treatment for BPDCN, but case 1 showed bone marrow suppression and case 2 developed recurrence after chemotherapy. Case 1 survived for 7 mo, case 2 for 17 mo, and case 3 for 9 mo. CONCLUSION: An accurate pathological diagnosis is a precondition for treatment, and the diagnosis of BPDCN should be based on a combination of clinical symptoms, pathological characteristics, immunophenotype, and other auxiliary examinations. It is necessary to clarify the clinicopathological features and biological behavior of BPDCN to improve its understanding by both clinicians and pathologists. Case 2 survived significantly longer than the other two cases, suggesting that the treatment received by case 2 was more effective.