Cargando…

Type of anesthesia and quality of recovery in male patients undergoing lumbar surgery: a randomized trial comparing propofol-remifentanil total i.v. anesthesia with sevoflurane anesthesia

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that women achieve a better quality of postoperative recovery from total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) than from inhalation anesthesia, but the effect of anesthesia type on recovery in male patients is unclear. This study therefore compared patient recovery be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meng, Wenjun, Yang, Chengwei, Wei, Xin, Wang, Sheng, Kang, Fang, Huang, Xiang, Li, Juan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8638110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34852781
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01519-y
_version_ 1784608886934732800
author Meng, Wenjun
Yang, Chengwei
Wei, Xin
Wang, Sheng
Kang, Fang
Huang, Xiang
Li, Juan
author_facet Meng, Wenjun
Yang, Chengwei
Wei, Xin
Wang, Sheng
Kang, Fang
Huang, Xiang
Li, Juan
author_sort Meng, Wenjun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that women achieve a better quality of postoperative recovery from total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) than from inhalation anesthesia, but the effect of anesthesia type on recovery in male patients is unclear. This study therefore compared patient recovery between males undergoing lumbar surgery who received TIVA and those who received sevoflurane anesthesia. METHODS: Eighty male patients undergoing elective one- or two-level primary transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) were randomly divided into two groups: the TIVA group (maintenance was achieved with propofol and remifentanil) or sevoflurane group (SEVO group: maintenance was achieved with sevoflurane and remifentanil). The quality of recovery-40 questionnaire (QoR-40) was administered before surgery and on postoperative days 1 and 2 (POD1 and POD2). Pain scores, postoperative nausea and vomiting, postoperative hospital stay, anesthesia consumption, and adverse effects were recorded. RESULTS: The QoR-40 scores were similar on the three points (Preoperative, POD1 and POD2). Pain scores were significantly lower in the SEVO group than in the TIVA group on POD1 (30.6 vs 31.4; P = 0.01) and POD2 (32 vs 33; P = 0.002). There was no significant difference in the postoperative hospital stay or complications in the postanesthesia care unit between the TIVA group and the SEVO group. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the quality of recovery is not significantly different between male TLIF surgery patients who receive TIVA and those who receive sevoflurane anesthesia. Patients in the TIVA group had better postoperative analgesic effect on POD2. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This was registered at http://www.chictr.org.cn (registration number ChiCTR-IOR-16007987, registration date: 24/02/2016). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12871-021-01519-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8638110
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86381102021-12-02 Type of anesthesia and quality of recovery in male patients undergoing lumbar surgery: a randomized trial comparing propofol-remifentanil total i.v. anesthesia with sevoflurane anesthesia Meng, Wenjun Yang, Chengwei Wei, Xin Wang, Sheng Kang, Fang Huang, Xiang Li, Juan BMC Anesthesiol Research BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that women achieve a better quality of postoperative recovery from total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) than from inhalation anesthesia, but the effect of anesthesia type on recovery in male patients is unclear. This study therefore compared patient recovery between males undergoing lumbar surgery who received TIVA and those who received sevoflurane anesthesia. METHODS: Eighty male patients undergoing elective one- or two-level primary transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) were randomly divided into two groups: the TIVA group (maintenance was achieved with propofol and remifentanil) or sevoflurane group (SEVO group: maintenance was achieved with sevoflurane and remifentanil). The quality of recovery-40 questionnaire (QoR-40) was administered before surgery and on postoperative days 1 and 2 (POD1 and POD2). Pain scores, postoperative nausea and vomiting, postoperative hospital stay, anesthesia consumption, and adverse effects were recorded. RESULTS: The QoR-40 scores were similar on the three points (Preoperative, POD1 and POD2). Pain scores were significantly lower in the SEVO group than in the TIVA group on POD1 (30.6 vs 31.4; P = 0.01) and POD2 (32 vs 33; P = 0.002). There was no significant difference in the postoperative hospital stay or complications in the postanesthesia care unit between the TIVA group and the SEVO group. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the quality of recovery is not significantly different between male TLIF surgery patients who receive TIVA and those who receive sevoflurane anesthesia. Patients in the TIVA group had better postoperative analgesic effect on POD2. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This was registered at http://www.chictr.org.cn (registration number ChiCTR-IOR-16007987, registration date: 24/02/2016). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12871-021-01519-y. BioMed Central 2021-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8638110/ /pubmed/34852781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01519-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Meng, Wenjun
Yang, Chengwei
Wei, Xin
Wang, Sheng
Kang, Fang
Huang, Xiang
Li, Juan
Type of anesthesia and quality of recovery in male patients undergoing lumbar surgery: a randomized trial comparing propofol-remifentanil total i.v. anesthesia with sevoflurane anesthesia
title Type of anesthesia and quality of recovery in male patients undergoing lumbar surgery: a randomized trial comparing propofol-remifentanil total i.v. anesthesia with sevoflurane anesthesia
title_full Type of anesthesia and quality of recovery in male patients undergoing lumbar surgery: a randomized trial comparing propofol-remifentanil total i.v. anesthesia with sevoflurane anesthesia
title_fullStr Type of anesthesia and quality of recovery in male patients undergoing lumbar surgery: a randomized trial comparing propofol-remifentanil total i.v. anesthesia with sevoflurane anesthesia
title_full_unstemmed Type of anesthesia and quality of recovery in male patients undergoing lumbar surgery: a randomized trial comparing propofol-remifentanil total i.v. anesthesia with sevoflurane anesthesia
title_short Type of anesthesia and quality of recovery in male patients undergoing lumbar surgery: a randomized trial comparing propofol-remifentanil total i.v. anesthesia with sevoflurane anesthesia
title_sort type of anesthesia and quality of recovery in male patients undergoing lumbar surgery: a randomized trial comparing propofol-remifentanil total i.v. anesthesia with sevoflurane anesthesia
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8638110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34852781
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01519-y
work_keys_str_mv AT mengwenjun typeofanesthesiaandqualityofrecoveryinmalepatientsundergoinglumbarsurgeryarandomizedtrialcomparingpropofolremifentaniltotalivanesthesiawithsevofluraneanesthesia
AT yangchengwei typeofanesthesiaandqualityofrecoveryinmalepatientsundergoinglumbarsurgeryarandomizedtrialcomparingpropofolremifentaniltotalivanesthesiawithsevofluraneanesthesia
AT weixin typeofanesthesiaandqualityofrecoveryinmalepatientsundergoinglumbarsurgeryarandomizedtrialcomparingpropofolremifentaniltotalivanesthesiawithsevofluraneanesthesia
AT wangsheng typeofanesthesiaandqualityofrecoveryinmalepatientsundergoinglumbarsurgeryarandomizedtrialcomparingpropofolremifentaniltotalivanesthesiawithsevofluraneanesthesia
AT kangfang typeofanesthesiaandqualityofrecoveryinmalepatientsundergoinglumbarsurgeryarandomizedtrialcomparingpropofolremifentaniltotalivanesthesiawithsevofluraneanesthesia
AT huangxiang typeofanesthesiaandqualityofrecoveryinmalepatientsundergoinglumbarsurgeryarandomizedtrialcomparingpropofolremifentaniltotalivanesthesiawithsevofluraneanesthesia
AT lijuan typeofanesthesiaandqualityofrecoveryinmalepatientsundergoinglumbarsurgeryarandomizedtrialcomparingpropofolremifentaniltotalivanesthesiawithsevofluraneanesthesia