Cargando…
Choosing what works for whom: towards a better use of mechanistic knowledge in clinical practice
BACKGROUND: Clinicians commonly try to use mechanism-based knowledge to make sense of the complexity and uncertainty of chronic pain treatments to create a rationale for their clinical decision-making. Although this seems intuitive, there are some problems with this approach. DISCUSSION: The widespr...
Autores principales: | Alaiti, Rafael K., Saragiotto, Bruno T., Fukusawa, Leandro, D.A. Rabelo, Nayra, de Oliveira, Anamaria S. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8638198/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34847952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40945-021-00122-1 |
Ejemplares similares
-
What Is a Young Life Worth?: What Is My Life’s Work!
por: Bates, Sharon M.
Publicado: (2020) -
Disentangling what works best for whom in comorbidity
por: Glozier, Nick, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Knowledge exchange—Working together across the globe
por: Srivatsa, Uma N., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
COVID-19: What we’ve done well and what we could or should have done better—the 4 Ps
por: Vincent, Jean-Louis, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Phases-of-illness paradigm: better communication, better outcomes
por: Pamplin, Jeremy C, et al.
Publicado: (2011)