Cargando…

Is titanium alloy Ti‐6Al‐4 V cytotoxic to gingival fibroblasts—A systematic review

OBJECTIVES: Grade V titanium alloy (Ti‐6Al‐4 V) is a well‐recognized metallic biomaterial for medical implants. There has been some controversy regarding the use of this alloy in medical devices in relation to the toxicity of vanadium. In Dentistry, Ti‐6Al‐4 V remains prevalent. This systematic revi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Willis, Jonathan, Li, Siwei, Crean, St John, Barrak, Fadi N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8638288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34018703
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.444
_version_ 1784608922443710464
author Willis, Jonathan
Li, Siwei
Crean, St John
Barrak, Fadi N.
author_facet Willis, Jonathan
Li, Siwei
Crean, St John
Barrak, Fadi N.
author_sort Willis, Jonathan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Grade V titanium alloy (Ti‐6Al‐4 V) is a well‐recognized metallic biomaterial for medical implants. There has been some controversy regarding the use of this alloy in medical devices in relation to the toxicity of vanadium. In Dentistry, Ti‐6Al‐4 V remains prevalent. This systematic review aims to evaluate the effects of Ti‐6Al‐4 V on cells relevant to oral environments such as gingival fibroblasts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search was undertaken for relevant English language publications in the following databases: Dental and Oral Science, Medline and Web of Science. The electronic search was supplemented with a search of references. RESULTS: After application of inclusion and exclusion criteria. A total of eight papers are included in this review. These papers were all in vitro studies and were categorized into whole implant, discs, or implant particles based on the type of test materials used in the studies. CONCLUSION: Based on the analyses of the eight included studies in this review, if Ti‐6Al‐4 V as a material is unchallenged, i.e., as a whole implant in pH neutral environments, there appears to be little effect on fibroblasts. If Ti‐6Al‐4 V is challenged through corrosion or wear (particle release), the subsequent release of vanadium and aluminium particles has an increased cytotoxic effect in vitro in comparison to commercially pure titanium, hence concerns should be raised in the clinical setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8638288
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86382882021-12-09 Is titanium alloy Ti‐6Al‐4 V cytotoxic to gingival fibroblasts—A systematic review Willis, Jonathan Li, Siwei Crean, St John Barrak, Fadi N. Clin Exp Dent Res Review Articles OBJECTIVES: Grade V titanium alloy (Ti‐6Al‐4 V) is a well‐recognized metallic biomaterial for medical implants. There has been some controversy regarding the use of this alloy in medical devices in relation to the toxicity of vanadium. In Dentistry, Ti‐6Al‐4 V remains prevalent. This systematic review aims to evaluate the effects of Ti‐6Al‐4 V on cells relevant to oral environments such as gingival fibroblasts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search was undertaken for relevant English language publications in the following databases: Dental and Oral Science, Medline and Web of Science. The electronic search was supplemented with a search of references. RESULTS: After application of inclusion and exclusion criteria. A total of eight papers are included in this review. These papers were all in vitro studies and were categorized into whole implant, discs, or implant particles based on the type of test materials used in the studies. CONCLUSION: Based on the analyses of the eight included studies in this review, if Ti‐6Al‐4 V as a material is unchallenged, i.e., as a whole implant in pH neutral environments, there appears to be little effect on fibroblasts. If Ti‐6Al‐4 V is challenged through corrosion or wear (particle release), the subsequent release of vanadium and aluminium particles has an increased cytotoxic effect in vitro in comparison to commercially pure titanium, hence concerns should be raised in the clinical setting. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8638288/ /pubmed/34018703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.444 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Clinical and Experimental Dental Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Willis, Jonathan
Li, Siwei
Crean, St John
Barrak, Fadi N.
Is titanium alloy Ti‐6Al‐4 V cytotoxic to gingival fibroblasts—A systematic review
title Is titanium alloy Ti‐6Al‐4 V cytotoxic to gingival fibroblasts—A systematic review
title_full Is titanium alloy Ti‐6Al‐4 V cytotoxic to gingival fibroblasts—A systematic review
title_fullStr Is titanium alloy Ti‐6Al‐4 V cytotoxic to gingival fibroblasts—A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Is titanium alloy Ti‐6Al‐4 V cytotoxic to gingival fibroblasts—A systematic review
title_short Is titanium alloy Ti‐6Al‐4 V cytotoxic to gingival fibroblasts—A systematic review
title_sort is titanium alloy ti‐6al‐4 v cytotoxic to gingival fibroblasts—a systematic review
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8638288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34018703
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.444
work_keys_str_mv AT willisjonathan istitaniumalloyti6al4vcytotoxictogingivalfibroblastsasystematicreview
AT lisiwei istitaniumalloyti6al4vcytotoxictogingivalfibroblastsasystematicreview
AT creanstjohn istitaniumalloyti6al4vcytotoxictogingivalfibroblastsasystematicreview
AT barrakfadin istitaniumalloyti6al4vcytotoxictogingivalfibroblastsasystematicreview