Cargando…

Comparative study of bacterial microfiltration in the implant‐abutment interface, with straight and conical internal connections, in vitro

OBJECTIVE: to determine the presence of marginal bacterial microfiltration in the IAI in different implant/abutment systems, in vitro. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty‐six implants from seven different brand names, 4 with cone and 3 with straight connections were used, implant and abutment were connected...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carlos, Larrucea V., C. Carlos, Navarro, SM. Karina, Larrucea, K. Sunil, Boda, E. Carlos, Padilla, G. Olga, Lobos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8638306/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34151544
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.439
_version_ 1784608926473388032
author Carlos, Larrucea V.
C. Carlos, Navarro
SM. Karina, Larrucea
K. Sunil, Boda
E. Carlos, Padilla
G. Olga, Lobos
author_facet Carlos, Larrucea V.
C. Carlos, Navarro
SM. Karina, Larrucea
K. Sunil, Boda
E. Carlos, Padilla
G. Olga, Lobos
author_sort Carlos, Larrucea V.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: to determine the presence of marginal bacterial microfiltration in the IAI in different implant/abutment systems, in vitro. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty‐six implants from seven different brand names, 4 with cone and 3 with straight connections were used, implant and abutment were connected using the Ncm tightening as indicated by each of the manufacturers and then were sealed. The samples were subjected occlusal load and thermal cycling, a first sample of each group was observed by micro CT and in a second sample (both samples randomly selected) length of connection was measured, while the rest of the samples were mounted on devices according to the bacterial microfiltration model with Porphyromonas gingivalis. RESULTS: Two of the conical connection system groups did not present bacterial microfiltration, one of the three straight connection groups only microfiltered in one sample, while the other two conical as well as the two straight connection samples showed different and important levels of bacterial microfiltration, all groups presented a direct relationship between the implant‐abutment adjustment determined by micro‐CT and bacterial microfiltration levels, not related to the connection length. Conclusion: Only two conical connection systems presented no bacterial microfiltration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8638306
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86383062021-12-09 Comparative study of bacterial microfiltration in the implant‐abutment interface, with straight and conical internal connections, in vitro Carlos, Larrucea V. C. Carlos, Navarro SM. Karina, Larrucea K. Sunil, Boda E. Carlos, Padilla G. Olga, Lobos Clin Exp Dent Res Original Articles OBJECTIVE: to determine the presence of marginal bacterial microfiltration in the IAI in different implant/abutment systems, in vitro. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty‐six implants from seven different brand names, 4 with cone and 3 with straight connections were used, implant and abutment were connected using the Ncm tightening as indicated by each of the manufacturers and then were sealed. The samples were subjected occlusal load and thermal cycling, a first sample of each group was observed by micro CT and in a second sample (both samples randomly selected) length of connection was measured, while the rest of the samples were mounted on devices according to the bacterial microfiltration model with Porphyromonas gingivalis. RESULTS: Two of the conical connection system groups did not present bacterial microfiltration, one of the three straight connection groups only microfiltered in one sample, while the other two conical as well as the two straight connection samples showed different and important levels of bacterial microfiltration, all groups presented a direct relationship between the implant‐abutment adjustment determined by micro‐CT and bacterial microfiltration levels, not related to the connection length. Conclusion: Only two conical connection systems presented no bacterial microfiltration. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8638306/ /pubmed/34151544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.439 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Clinical and Experimental Dental Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Carlos, Larrucea V.
C. Carlos, Navarro
SM. Karina, Larrucea
K. Sunil, Boda
E. Carlos, Padilla
G. Olga, Lobos
Comparative study of bacterial microfiltration in the implant‐abutment interface, with straight and conical internal connections, in vitro
title Comparative study of bacterial microfiltration in the implant‐abutment interface, with straight and conical internal connections, in vitro
title_full Comparative study of bacterial microfiltration in the implant‐abutment interface, with straight and conical internal connections, in vitro
title_fullStr Comparative study of bacterial microfiltration in the implant‐abutment interface, with straight and conical internal connections, in vitro
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study of bacterial microfiltration in the implant‐abutment interface, with straight and conical internal connections, in vitro
title_short Comparative study of bacterial microfiltration in the implant‐abutment interface, with straight and conical internal connections, in vitro
title_sort comparative study of bacterial microfiltration in the implant‐abutment interface, with straight and conical internal connections, in vitro
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8638306/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34151544
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.439
work_keys_str_mv AT carloslarruceav comparativestudyofbacterialmicrofiltrationintheimplantabutmentinterfacewithstraightandconicalinternalconnectionsinvitro
AT ccarlosnavarro comparativestudyofbacterialmicrofiltrationintheimplantabutmentinterfacewithstraightandconicalinternalconnectionsinvitro
AT smkarinalarrucea comparativestudyofbacterialmicrofiltrationintheimplantabutmentinterfacewithstraightandconicalinternalconnectionsinvitro
AT ksunilboda comparativestudyofbacterialmicrofiltrationintheimplantabutmentinterfacewithstraightandconicalinternalconnectionsinvitro
AT ecarlospadilla comparativestudyofbacterialmicrofiltrationintheimplantabutmentinterfacewithstraightandconicalinternalconnectionsinvitro
AT golgalobos comparativestudyofbacterialmicrofiltrationintheimplantabutmentinterfacewithstraightandconicalinternalconnectionsinvitro