Cargando…

Distribution of lip‐seal strength and its relation to oral motor functions

OBJECTIVES: Lip‐seal strength, which represents the muscle strength of the lips, appears to chiefly contribute to mastication and pronunciation. However, the functional characteristics of lip‐seal strength in adults are still undefined. The present study aimed to understand not only the distribution...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kugimiya, Yoshihiro, Oki, Takeshi, Ohta, Midori, Ryu, Masahiro, Kobayashi, Kenichiro, Sakurai, Kaoru, Ueda, Takayuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8638310/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33963687
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.440
_version_ 1784608927455903744
author Kugimiya, Yoshihiro
Oki, Takeshi
Ohta, Midori
Ryu, Masahiro
Kobayashi, Kenichiro
Sakurai, Kaoru
Ueda, Takayuki
author_facet Kugimiya, Yoshihiro
Oki, Takeshi
Ohta, Midori
Ryu, Masahiro
Kobayashi, Kenichiro
Sakurai, Kaoru
Ueda, Takayuki
author_sort Kugimiya, Yoshihiro
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Lip‐seal strength, which represents the muscle strength of the lips, appears to chiefly contribute to mastication and pronunciation. However, the functional characteristics of lip‐seal strength in adults are still undefined. The present study aimed to understand not only the distribution of lip‐seal strength in adult men and women but also the effect of age on this strength and identify oral motor functions correlated with lip‐seal strength. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The subjects included 339 participants (men: 170, age 39.2 ± 18.2 years; women: 169, age 43.1 ± 19.7 years). Oral motor function was evaluated for lip‐seal strength, oral diadochokinesis (ODK), tongue pressure, occlusal force, and masticatory performance. Statistical analyses included the Shapiro–Wilk, Mann–Whitney U, and Jonckheere–Terpstra tests, in addition to the Spearman's correlation analysis and curvilinear regression analysis. RESULTS: Lip‐seal strength did not have a normal distribution (p < 0.001). The mean ± standard deviation and median (first quartile, third quartile) of lip‐seal strength were 11.2 ± 3.4 and 10.9 (8.7, 13.2)N for the whole sample, 12.3 ± 3.4 and 11.9 (9.4, 14.4)N for men, and 10.2 ± 3.0 and 9.9 (8.0, 12.0)N for women. A significant difference was observed in lip‐seal strength between men and women (p < 0.001). Oral motor functions showed a marked correlation with lip‐seal strength, including tongue pressure, occlusal force, and masticatory performance and ODK (/pa/ and /ta/), tongue pressure, and masticatory ability in men and women, respectively. In women, lip‐seal strength declined with increase in age. CONCLUSIONS: Lip‐seal strength was non‐normally distributed in both men and women, and lip‐seal strength was affected by age only in women. Lip‐seal strength and multiple oral motor functions were significantly correlated. Because the indicators of perioral muscle strength and performance were correlated with lip‐seal strength, lip‐seal strength may also partially reflect the condition of the perioral muscles.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8638310
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86383102021-12-09 Distribution of lip‐seal strength and its relation to oral motor functions Kugimiya, Yoshihiro Oki, Takeshi Ohta, Midori Ryu, Masahiro Kobayashi, Kenichiro Sakurai, Kaoru Ueda, Takayuki Clin Exp Dent Res Original Articles OBJECTIVES: Lip‐seal strength, which represents the muscle strength of the lips, appears to chiefly contribute to mastication and pronunciation. However, the functional characteristics of lip‐seal strength in adults are still undefined. The present study aimed to understand not only the distribution of lip‐seal strength in adult men and women but also the effect of age on this strength and identify oral motor functions correlated with lip‐seal strength. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The subjects included 339 participants (men: 170, age 39.2 ± 18.2 years; women: 169, age 43.1 ± 19.7 years). Oral motor function was evaluated for lip‐seal strength, oral diadochokinesis (ODK), tongue pressure, occlusal force, and masticatory performance. Statistical analyses included the Shapiro–Wilk, Mann–Whitney U, and Jonckheere–Terpstra tests, in addition to the Spearman's correlation analysis and curvilinear regression analysis. RESULTS: Lip‐seal strength did not have a normal distribution (p < 0.001). The mean ± standard deviation and median (first quartile, third quartile) of lip‐seal strength were 11.2 ± 3.4 and 10.9 (8.7, 13.2)N for the whole sample, 12.3 ± 3.4 and 11.9 (9.4, 14.4)N for men, and 10.2 ± 3.0 and 9.9 (8.0, 12.0)N for women. A significant difference was observed in lip‐seal strength between men and women (p < 0.001). Oral motor functions showed a marked correlation with lip‐seal strength, including tongue pressure, occlusal force, and masticatory performance and ODK (/pa/ and /ta/), tongue pressure, and masticatory ability in men and women, respectively. In women, lip‐seal strength declined with increase in age. CONCLUSIONS: Lip‐seal strength was non‐normally distributed in both men and women, and lip‐seal strength was affected by age only in women. Lip‐seal strength and multiple oral motor functions were significantly correlated. Because the indicators of perioral muscle strength and performance were correlated with lip‐seal strength, lip‐seal strength may also partially reflect the condition of the perioral muscles. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8638310/ /pubmed/33963687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.440 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Clinical and Experimental Dental Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Kugimiya, Yoshihiro
Oki, Takeshi
Ohta, Midori
Ryu, Masahiro
Kobayashi, Kenichiro
Sakurai, Kaoru
Ueda, Takayuki
Distribution of lip‐seal strength and its relation to oral motor functions
title Distribution of lip‐seal strength and its relation to oral motor functions
title_full Distribution of lip‐seal strength and its relation to oral motor functions
title_fullStr Distribution of lip‐seal strength and its relation to oral motor functions
title_full_unstemmed Distribution of lip‐seal strength and its relation to oral motor functions
title_short Distribution of lip‐seal strength and its relation to oral motor functions
title_sort distribution of lip‐seal strength and its relation to oral motor functions
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8638310/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33963687
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.440
work_keys_str_mv AT kugimiyayoshihiro distributionoflipsealstrengthanditsrelationtooralmotorfunctions
AT okitakeshi distributionoflipsealstrengthanditsrelationtooralmotorfunctions
AT ohtamidori distributionoflipsealstrengthanditsrelationtooralmotorfunctions
AT ryumasahiro distributionoflipsealstrengthanditsrelationtooralmotorfunctions
AT kobayashikenichiro distributionoflipsealstrengthanditsrelationtooralmotorfunctions
AT sakuraikaoru distributionoflipsealstrengthanditsrelationtooralmotorfunctions
AT uedatakayuki distributionoflipsealstrengthanditsrelationtooralmotorfunctions