Cargando…
Implementing within‐cross genomic prediction to reduce oat breeding costs
A barrier to the adoption of genomic prediction in small breeding programs is the initial cost of genotyping material. Although decreasing, marker costs are usually higher than field trial costs. In this study we demonstrate the utility of stratifying a narrow‐base biparental oat population genotype...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8638661/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33016630 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tpg2.20004 |
_version_ | 1784608986049282048 |
---|---|
author | Mellers, Greg Mackay, Ian Cowan, Sandy Griffiths, Irene Martinez‐Martin, Pilar Poland, Jesse A. Bekele, Wubishet Tinker, Nicholas A. Bentley, Alison R. Howarth, Catherine J. |
author_facet | Mellers, Greg Mackay, Ian Cowan, Sandy Griffiths, Irene Martinez‐Martin, Pilar Poland, Jesse A. Bekele, Wubishet Tinker, Nicholas A. Bentley, Alison R. Howarth, Catherine J. |
author_sort | Mellers, Greg |
collection | PubMed |
description | A barrier to the adoption of genomic prediction in small breeding programs is the initial cost of genotyping material. Although decreasing, marker costs are usually higher than field trial costs. In this study we demonstrate the utility of stratifying a narrow‐base biparental oat population genotyped with a modest number of markers to employ genomic prediction at early and later generations. We also show that early generation genotyping data can reduce the number of lines for later phenotyping based on selections of siblings to progress. Using sets of small families selected at an early generation could enable the use of genomic prediction for adaptation to multiple target environments at an early stage in the breeding program. In addition, we demonstrate that mixed marker data can be effectively integrated to combine cheap dominant marker data (including legacy data) with more expensive but higher density codominant marker data in order to make within generation and between lineage predictions based on genotypic information. Taken together, our results indicate that small programs can test and initiate genomic predictions using sets of stratified, narrow‐base populations and incorporating low density legacy genotyping data. This can then be scaled to include higher density markers and a broadened population base. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8638661 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86386612021-12-09 Implementing within‐cross genomic prediction to reduce oat breeding costs Mellers, Greg Mackay, Ian Cowan, Sandy Griffiths, Irene Martinez‐Martin, Pilar Poland, Jesse A. Bekele, Wubishet Tinker, Nicholas A. Bentley, Alison R. Howarth, Catherine J. Plant Genome Original Research A barrier to the adoption of genomic prediction in small breeding programs is the initial cost of genotyping material. Although decreasing, marker costs are usually higher than field trial costs. In this study we demonstrate the utility of stratifying a narrow‐base biparental oat population genotyped with a modest number of markers to employ genomic prediction at early and later generations. We also show that early generation genotyping data can reduce the number of lines for later phenotyping based on selections of siblings to progress. Using sets of small families selected at an early generation could enable the use of genomic prediction for adaptation to multiple target environments at an early stage in the breeding program. In addition, we demonstrate that mixed marker data can be effectively integrated to combine cheap dominant marker data (including legacy data) with more expensive but higher density codominant marker data in order to make within generation and between lineage predictions based on genotypic information. Taken together, our results indicate that small programs can test and initiate genomic predictions using sets of stratified, narrow‐base populations and incorporating low density legacy genotyping data. This can then be scaled to include higher density markers and a broadened population base. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-03-17 2020-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8638661/ /pubmed/33016630 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tpg2.20004 Text en © 2019 The Authors. The Plant Genome published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Crop Science Society of America https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Mellers, Greg Mackay, Ian Cowan, Sandy Griffiths, Irene Martinez‐Martin, Pilar Poland, Jesse A. Bekele, Wubishet Tinker, Nicholas A. Bentley, Alison R. Howarth, Catherine J. Implementing within‐cross genomic prediction to reduce oat breeding costs |
title | Implementing within‐cross genomic prediction to reduce oat breeding costs |
title_full | Implementing within‐cross genomic prediction to reduce oat breeding costs |
title_fullStr | Implementing within‐cross genomic prediction to reduce oat breeding costs |
title_full_unstemmed | Implementing within‐cross genomic prediction to reduce oat breeding costs |
title_short | Implementing within‐cross genomic prediction to reduce oat breeding costs |
title_sort | implementing within‐cross genomic prediction to reduce oat breeding costs |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8638661/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33016630 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tpg2.20004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mellersgreg implementingwithincrossgenomicpredictiontoreduceoatbreedingcosts AT mackayian implementingwithincrossgenomicpredictiontoreduceoatbreedingcosts AT cowansandy implementingwithincrossgenomicpredictiontoreduceoatbreedingcosts AT griffithsirene implementingwithincrossgenomicpredictiontoreduceoatbreedingcosts AT martinezmartinpilar implementingwithincrossgenomicpredictiontoreduceoatbreedingcosts AT polandjessea implementingwithincrossgenomicpredictiontoreduceoatbreedingcosts AT bekelewubishet implementingwithincrossgenomicpredictiontoreduceoatbreedingcosts AT tinkernicholasa implementingwithincrossgenomicpredictiontoreduceoatbreedingcosts AT bentleyalisonr implementingwithincrossgenomicpredictiontoreduceoatbreedingcosts AT howarthcatherinej implementingwithincrossgenomicpredictiontoreduceoatbreedingcosts |