Cargando…

Implementing within‐cross genomic prediction to reduce oat breeding costs

A barrier to the adoption of genomic prediction in small breeding programs is the initial cost of genotyping material. Although decreasing, marker costs are usually higher than field trial costs. In this study we demonstrate the utility of stratifying a narrow‐base biparental oat population genotype...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mellers, Greg, Mackay, Ian, Cowan, Sandy, Griffiths, Irene, Martinez‐Martin, Pilar, Poland, Jesse A., Bekele, Wubishet, Tinker, Nicholas A., Bentley, Alison R., Howarth, Catherine J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8638661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33016630
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tpg2.20004
_version_ 1784608986049282048
author Mellers, Greg
Mackay, Ian
Cowan, Sandy
Griffiths, Irene
Martinez‐Martin, Pilar
Poland, Jesse A.
Bekele, Wubishet
Tinker, Nicholas A.
Bentley, Alison R.
Howarth, Catherine J.
author_facet Mellers, Greg
Mackay, Ian
Cowan, Sandy
Griffiths, Irene
Martinez‐Martin, Pilar
Poland, Jesse A.
Bekele, Wubishet
Tinker, Nicholas A.
Bentley, Alison R.
Howarth, Catherine J.
author_sort Mellers, Greg
collection PubMed
description A barrier to the adoption of genomic prediction in small breeding programs is the initial cost of genotyping material. Although decreasing, marker costs are usually higher than field trial costs. In this study we demonstrate the utility of stratifying a narrow‐base biparental oat population genotyped with a modest number of markers to employ genomic prediction at early and later generations. We also show that early generation genotyping data can reduce the number of lines for later phenotyping based on selections of siblings to progress. Using sets of small families selected at an early generation could enable the use of genomic prediction for adaptation to multiple target environments at an early stage in the breeding program. In addition, we demonstrate that mixed marker data can be effectively integrated to combine cheap dominant marker data (including legacy data) with more expensive but higher density codominant marker data in order to make within generation and between lineage predictions based on genotypic information. Taken together, our results indicate that small programs can test and initiate genomic predictions using sets of stratified, narrow‐base populations and incorporating low density legacy genotyping data. This can then be scaled to include higher density markers and a broadened population base.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8638661
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86386612021-12-09 Implementing within‐cross genomic prediction to reduce oat breeding costs Mellers, Greg Mackay, Ian Cowan, Sandy Griffiths, Irene Martinez‐Martin, Pilar Poland, Jesse A. Bekele, Wubishet Tinker, Nicholas A. Bentley, Alison R. Howarth, Catherine J. Plant Genome Original Research A barrier to the adoption of genomic prediction in small breeding programs is the initial cost of genotyping material. Although decreasing, marker costs are usually higher than field trial costs. In this study we demonstrate the utility of stratifying a narrow‐base biparental oat population genotyped with a modest number of markers to employ genomic prediction at early and later generations. We also show that early generation genotyping data can reduce the number of lines for later phenotyping based on selections of siblings to progress. Using sets of small families selected at an early generation could enable the use of genomic prediction for adaptation to multiple target environments at an early stage in the breeding program. In addition, we demonstrate that mixed marker data can be effectively integrated to combine cheap dominant marker data (including legacy data) with more expensive but higher density codominant marker data in order to make within generation and between lineage predictions based on genotypic information. Taken together, our results indicate that small programs can test and initiate genomic predictions using sets of stratified, narrow‐base populations and incorporating low density legacy genotyping data. This can then be scaled to include higher density markers and a broadened population base. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-03-17 2020-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8638661/ /pubmed/33016630 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tpg2.20004 Text en © 2019 The Authors. The Plant Genome published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Crop Science Society of America https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Mellers, Greg
Mackay, Ian
Cowan, Sandy
Griffiths, Irene
Martinez‐Martin, Pilar
Poland, Jesse A.
Bekele, Wubishet
Tinker, Nicholas A.
Bentley, Alison R.
Howarth, Catherine J.
Implementing within‐cross genomic prediction to reduce oat breeding costs
title Implementing within‐cross genomic prediction to reduce oat breeding costs
title_full Implementing within‐cross genomic prediction to reduce oat breeding costs
title_fullStr Implementing within‐cross genomic prediction to reduce oat breeding costs
title_full_unstemmed Implementing within‐cross genomic prediction to reduce oat breeding costs
title_short Implementing within‐cross genomic prediction to reduce oat breeding costs
title_sort implementing within‐cross genomic prediction to reduce oat breeding costs
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8638661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33016630
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tpg2.20004
work_keys_str_mv AT mellersgreg implementingwithincrossgenomicpredictiontoreduceoatbreedingcosts
AT mackayian implementingwithincrossgenomicpredictiontoreduceoatbreedingcosts
AT cowansandy implementingwithincrossgenomicpredictiontoreduceoatbreedingcosts
AT griffithsirene implementingwithincrossgenomicpredictiontoreduceoatbreedingcosts
AT martinezmartinpilar implementingwithincrossgenomicpredictiontoreduceoatbreedingcosts
AT polandjessea implementingwithincrossgenomicpredictiontoreduceoatbreedingcosts
AT bekelewubishet implementingwithincrossgenomicpredictiontoreduceoatbreedingcosts
AT tinkernicholasa implementingwithincrossgenomicpredictiontoreduceoatbreedingcosts
AT bentleyalisonr implementingwithincrossgenomicpredictiontoreduceoatbreedingcosts
AT howarthcatherinej implementingwithincrossgenomicpredictiontoreduceoatbreedingcosts