Cargando…
Extreme Exposure to Filtered Far‐UVC: A Case Study
Far‐UVC devices are being commercially sold as “safe for humans” for the inactivation of SARS‐CoV‐2, without supporting human safety data. We felt there was a need for rapid proof‐of‐concept human self‐exposure, to inform future controlled research and promote informed discussion. A Fitzpatrick Skin...
Autores principales: | Eadie, Ewan, Barnard, Isla M. R., Ibbotson, Sally H., Wood, Kenneth |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8638665/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33471372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/php.13385 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Further evidence that far‐UVC for disinfection is unlikely to cause erythema or pre‐mutagenic DNA lesions in skin
por: Barnard, Isla Rose Mary, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Far-UVC (222 nm) efficiently inactivates an airborne pathogen in a room-sized chamber
por: Eadie, Ewan, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Ocular and Facial Far‐UVC Doses from Ceiling‐Mounted 222 nm Far‐UVC Fixtures
por: Duncan, Michael A., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Antimicrobial Activity of Filtered Far-UVC Light (222 nm) against Different Pathogens
por: Lorenzo-Leal, Ana C., et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Far-UVC Radiation for Disinfecting Hands or Gloves?
por: Hessling, Martin, et al.
Publicado: (2023)