Cargando…

Comparison two blood culture bottles for the recovery of Enterobacteriaceae

INTRODUCTION: The objective of the present study was to compare the suitability of the B BACTEC™ Lytic/10 Anaerobic/F versus B BACTEC™ Plus Aerobic/F vials at the time of both Enterobacteriaceae recovery rate and detection time. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective observational study from September 20...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Malet, Ana, García-Merino, Marisol, Velasco, Silvia, de Alegría Puig, Carlos Ruiz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedad Española de Quimioterapia 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8638759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34517468
http://dx.doi.org/10.37201/req/154.2020
_version_ 1784609004372099072
author De Malet, Ana
García-Merino, Marisol
Velasco, Silvia
de Alegría Puig, Carlos Ruiz
author_facet De Malet, Ana
García-Merino, Marisol
Velasco, Silvia
de Alegría Puig, Carlos Ruiz
author_sort De Malet, Ana
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The objective of the present study was to compare the suitability of the B BACTEC™ Lytic/10 Anaerobic/F versus B BACTEC™ Plus Aerobic/F vials at the time of both Enterobacteriaceae recovery rate and detection time. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective observational study from September 2018 to January 2019 in which 150 bacteremia. The samples were incubated in the automated BD BACTEC ™ FX system (Becton Dickison). RESULTS: A total of 180 Enterobacteriaceae were isolated: 93 B BACTEC™ Plus Aerobic/F and 87 from B BACTEC™ Lytic/10 Anaerobic/F belonging to 106 patients The urinary focus was the most frequent origin. The average detection time in both cases was not more than 15 hours. CONCLUSION: The combination of both bottles seems to be the best diagnostic strategy, thus reducing the detection time as well as increasing the recovery of Enterobacteriaceae. The combination of both vials could be implemented especially in selected situation of special urgency such as the sepsis code or critical patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8638759
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Sociedad Española de Quimioterapia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86387592021-12-10 Comparison two blood culture bottles for the recovery of Enterobacteriaceae De Malet, Ana García-Merino, Marisol Velasco, Silvia de Alegría Puig, Carlos Ruiz Rev Esp Quimioter Brief Report INTRODUCTION: The objective of the present study was to compare the suitability of the B BACTEC™ Lytic/10 Anaerobic/F versus B BACTEC™ Plus Aerobic/F vials at the time of both Enterobacteriaceae recovery rate and detection time. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective observational study from September 2018 to January 2019 in which 150 bacteremia. The samples were incubated in the automated BD BACTEC ™ FX system (Becton Dickison). RESULTS: A total of 180 Enterobacteriaceae were isolated: 93 B BACTEC™ Plus Aerobic/F and 87 from B BACTEC™ Lytic/10 Anaerobic/F belonging to 106 patients The urinary focus was the most frequent origin. The average detection time in both cases was not more than 15 hours. CONCLUSION: The combination of both bottles seems to be the best diagnostic strategy, thus reducing the detection time as well as increasing the recovery of Enterobacteriaceae. The combination of both vials could be implemented especially in selected situation of special urgency such as the sepsis code or critical patients. Sociedad Española de Quimioterapia 2021-09-13 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8638759/ /pubmed/34517468 http://dx.doi.org/10.37201/req/154.2020 Text en © The Author 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Published by Sociedad Española de Quimioterapia. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
spellingShingle Brief Report
De Malet, Ana
García-Merino, Marisol
Velasco, Silvia
de Alegría Puig, Carlos Ruiz
Comparison two blood culture bottles for the recovery of Enterobacteriaceae
title Comparison two blood culture bottles for the recovery of Enterobacteriaceae
title_full Comparison two blood culture bottles for the recovery of Enterobacteriaceae
title_fullStr Comparison two blood culture bottles for the recovery of Enterobacteriaceae
title_full_unstemmed Comparison two blood culture bottles for the recovery of Enterobacteriaceae
title_short Comparison two blood culture bottles for the recovery of Enterobacteriaceae
title_sort comparison two blood culture bottles for the recovery of enterobacteriaceae
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8638759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34517468
http://dx.doi.org/10.37201/req/154.2020
work_keys_str_mv AT demaletana comparisontwobloodculturebottlesfortherecoveryofenterobacteriaceae
AT garciamerinomarisol comparisontwobloodculturebottlesfortherecoveryofenterobacteriaceae
AT velascosilvia comparisontwobloodculturebottlesfortherecoveryofenterobacteriaceae
AT dealegriapuigcarlosruiz comparisontwobloodculturebottlesfortherecoveryofenterobacteriaceae