Cargando…

Evaluación de la validez del Ag PANBIO-COVID19 de Abbott en el diagnóstico de la infección por SARS-CoV-2 en pacientes asintomáticos o con infección leve

OBJECTIVE: To assess the validity of SARS-CoV-2 Antigen (Ag) detection for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in mildly infected or asymptomatic patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Observational study to evaluate diagnostic tests. Non-hospitalized patients with indication for diagnostic testing for S...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gras-Valenti, Paula, Vidal, Inmaculada, Montiel-Higuero, Inés, Escribano, Isabel, Algado-Selles, Natividad, Chico-Sánchez, Pablo, Ventero, Maria Paz, Jiménez-Sepulveda, Natali, Molina-Pardines, Carmen, Merino-Lucas, Esperanza, Sánchez- Payá, José, Rodríguez, Juan Carlos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedad Española de Quimioterapia 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8638769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34549577
http://dx.doi.org/10.37201/req/054.2021
_version_ 1784609006758658048
author Gras-Valenti, Paula
Vidal, Inmaculada
Montiel-Higuero, Inés
Escribano, Isabel
Algado-Selles, Natividad
Chico-Sánchez, Pablo
Ventero, Maria Paz
Jiménez-Sepulveda, Natali
Molina-Pardines, Carmen
Merino-Lucas, Esperanza
Sánchez- Payá, José
Rodríguez, Juan Carlos
author_facet Gras-Valenti, Paula
Vidal, Inmaculada
Montiel-Higuero, Inés
Escribano, Isabel
Algado-Selles, Natividad
Chico-Sánchez, Pablo
Ventero, Maria Paz
Jiménez-Sepulveda, Natali
Molina-Pardines, Carmen
Merino-Lucas, Esperanza
Sánchez- Payá, José
Rodríguez, Juan Carlos
author_sort Gras-Valenti, Paula
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the validity of SARS-CoV-2 Antigen (Ag) detection for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in mildly infected or asymptomatic patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Observational study to evaluate diagnostic tests. Non-hospitalized patients with indication for diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 infection were included. The diagnostic test to be evaluated was the determination of Ag and as a reference standard to determine the presence of viral RNA the RT-PCR was used. RESULTS: A total of 494 patients were included. Of these 71.5% (353/494) had symptoms and 28.5% (141/494) were asymptomatic (presurgery screening (35/494) and confirmed case-contact (106/494). The overall sensitivity of the Ag test was 61.1% and the specificity was 99.7%. The sensitivity and specificity in the asymptomatic group were 40% and 100% respectively, and in the symptomatic group 63.5% and 99.6% respectively. In turn, the sensitivity and specificity in the group of symptomatic patients varied according to the time of symptom evolution: in patients with recent symptoms, they were 71.4% and 99.6% respectively, while in patients with symptoms of more than 5 days of evolution, they were 26.7% and 100% respectively. In all groups studied, the presence of antigen is associated with a high viral load (Ct<30 cycles). CONCLUSIONS: The use of Ag detection test is not indicated for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic patients or with symptoms of more than 5 days of evolution, but it could be useful in patients with symptoms of 1-5 days of evolution.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8638769
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Sociedad Española de Quimioterapia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86387692021-12-10 Evaluación de la validez del Ag PANBIO-COVID19 de Abbott en el diagnóstico de la infección por SARS-CoV-2 en pacientes asintomáticos o con infección leve Gras-Valenti, Paula Vidal, Inmaculada Montiel-Higuero, Inés Escribano, Isabel Algado-Selles, Natividad Chico-Sánchez, Pablo Ventero, Maria Paz Jiménez-Sepulveda, Natali Molina-Pardines, Carmen Merino-Lucas, Esperanza Sánchez- Payá, José Rodríguez, Juan Carlos Rev Esp Quimioter Original OBJECTIVE: To assess the validity of SARS-CoV-2 Antigen (Ag) detection for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in mildly infected or asymptomatic patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Observational study to evaluate diagnostic tests. Non-hospitalized patients with indication for diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 infection were included. The diagnostic test to be evaluated was the determination of Ag and as a reference standard to determine the presence of viral RNA the RT-PCR was used. RESULTS: A total of 494 patients were included. Of these 71.5% (353/494) had symptoms and 28.5% (141/494) were asymptomatic (presurgery screening (35/494) and confirmed case-contact (106/494). The overall sensitivity of the Ag test was 61.1% and the specificity was 99.7%. The sensitivity and specificity in the asymptomatic group were 40% and 100% respectively, and in the symptomatic group 63.5% and 99.6% respectively. In turn, the sensitivity and specificity in the group of symptomatic patients varied according to the time of symptom evolution: in patients with recent symptoms, they were 71.4% and 99.6% respectively, while in patients with symptoms of more than 5 days of evolution, they were 26.7% and 100% respectively. In all groups studied, the presence of antigen is associated with a high viral load (Ct<30 cycles). CONCLUSIONS: The use of Ag detection test is not indicated for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic patients or with symptoms of more than 5 days of evolution, but it could be useful in patients with symptoms of 1-5 days of evolution. Sociedad Española de Quimioterapia 2021-09-22 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8638769/ /pubmed/34549577 http://dx.doi.org/10.37201/req/054.2021 Text en © The Author 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Published by Sociedad Española de Quimioterapia. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original
Gras-Valenti, Paula
Vidal, Inmaculada
Montiel-Higuero, Inés
Escribano, Isabel
Algado-Selles, Natividad
Chico-Sánchez, Pablo
Ventero, Maria Paz
Jiménez-Sepulveda, Natali
Molina-Pardines, Carmen
Merino-Lucas, Esperanza
Sánchez- Payá, José
Rodríguez, Juan Carlos
Evaluación de la validez del Ag PANBIO-COVID19 de Abbott en el diagnóstico de la infección por SARS-CoV-2 en pacientes asintomáticos o con infección leve
title Evaluación de la validez del Ag PANBIO-COVID19 de Abbott en el diagnóstico de la infección por SARS-CoV-2 en pacientes asintomáticos o con infección leve
title_full Evaluación de la validez del Ag PANBIO-COVID19 de Abbott en el diagnóstico de la infección por SARS-CoV-2 en pacientes asintomáticos o con infección leve
title_fullStr Evaluación de la validez del Ag PANBIO-COVID19 de Abbott en el diagnóstico de la infección por SARS-CoV-2 en pacientes asintomáticos o con infección leve
title_full_unstemmed Evaluación de la validez del Ag PANBIO-COVID19 de Abbott en el diagnóstico de la infección por SARS-CoV-2 en pacientes asintomáticos o con infección leve
title_short Evaluación de la validez del Ag PANBIO-COVID19 de Abbott en el diagnóstico de la infección por SARS-CoV-2 en pacientes asintomáticos o con infección leve
title_sort evaluación de la validez del ag panbio-covid19 de abbott en el diagnóstico de la infección por sars-cov-2 en pacientes asintomáticos o con infección leve
topic Original
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8638769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34549577
http://dx.doi.org/10.37201/req/054.2021
work_keys_str_mv AT grasvalentipaula evaluaciondelavalidezdelagpanbiocovid19deabbotteneldiagnosticodelainfeccionporsarscov2enpacientesasintomaticosoconinfeccionleve
AT vidalinmaculada evaluaciondelavalidezdelagpanbiocovid19deabbotteneldiagnosticodelainfeccionporsarscov2enpacientesasintomaticosoconinfeccionleve
AT montielhigueroines evaluaciondelavalidezdelagpanbiocovid19deabbotteneldiagnosticodelainfeccionporsarscov2enpacientesasintomaticosoconinfeccionleve
AT escribanoisabel evaluaciondelavalidezdelagpanbiocovid19deabbotteneldiagnosticodelainfeccionporsarscov2enpacientesasintomaticosoconinfeccionleve
AT algadosellesnatividad evaluaciondelavalidezdelagpanbiocovid19deabbotteneldiagnosticodelainfeccionporsarscov2enpacientesasintomaticosoconinfeccionleve
AT chicosanchezpablo evaluaciondelavalidezdelagpanbiocovid19deabbotteneldiagnosticodelainfeccionporsarscov2enpacientesasintomaticosoconinfeccionleve
AT venteromariapaz evaluaciondelavalidezdelagpanbiocovid19deabbotteneldiagnosticodelainfeccionporsarscov2enpacientesasintomaticosoconinfeccionleve
AT jimenezsepulvedanatali evaluaciondelavalidezdelagpanbiocovid19deabbotteneldiagnosticodelainfeccionporsarscov2enpacientesasintomaticosoconinfeccionleve
AT molinapardinescarmen evaluaciondelavalidezdelagpanbiocovid19deabbotteneldiagnosticodelainfeccionporsarscov2enpacientesasintomaticosoconinfeccionleve
AT merinolucasesperanza evaluaciondelavalidezdelagpanbiocovid19deabbotteneldiagnosticodelainfeccionporsarscov2enpacientesasintomaticosoconinfeccionleve
AT sanchezpayajose evaluaciondelavalidezdelagpanbiocovid19deabbotteneldiagnosticodelainfeccionporsarscov2enpacientesasintomaticosoconinfeccionleve
AT rodriguezjuancarlos evaluaciondelavalidezdelagpanbiocovid19deabbotteneldiagnosticodelainfeccionporsarscov2enpacientesasintomaticosoconinfeccionleve