Cargando…
Evaluación de la validez del Ag PANBIO-COVID19 de Abbott en el diagnóstico de la infección por SARS-CoV-2 en pacientes asintomáticos o con infección leve
OBJECTIVE: To assess the validity of SARS-CoV-2 Antigen (Ag) detection for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in mildly infected or asymptomatic patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Observational study to evaluate diagnostic tests. Non-hospitalized patients with indication for diagnostic testing for S...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Sociedad Española de Quimioterapia
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8638769/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34549577 http://dx.doi.org/10.37201/req/054.2021 |
_version_ | 1784609006758658048 |
---|---|
author | Gras-Valenti, Paula Vidal, Inmaculada Montiel-Higuero, Inés Escribano, Isabel Algado-Selles, Natividad Chico-Sánchez, Pablo Ventero, Maria Paz Jiménez-Sepulveda, Natali Molina-Pardines, Carmen Merino-Lucas, Esperanza Sánchez- Payá, José Rodríguez, Juan Carlos |
author_facet | Gras-Valenti, Paula Vidal, Inmaculada Montiel-Higuero, Inés Escribano, Isabel Algado-Selles, Natividad Chico-Sánchez, Pablo Ventero, Maria Paz Jiménez-Sepulveda, Natali Molina-Pardines, Carmen Merino-Lucas, Esperanza Sánchez- Payá, José Rodríguez, Juan Carlos |
author_sort | Gras-Valenti, Paula |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To assess the validity of SARS-CoV-2 Antigen (Ag) detection for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in mildly infected or asymptomatic patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Observational study to evaluate diagnostic tests. Non-hospitalized patients with indication for diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 infection were included. The diagnostic test to be evaluated was the determination of Ag and as a reference standard to determine the presence of viral RNA the RT-PCR was used. RESULTS: A total of 494 patients were included. Of these 71.5% (353/494) had symptoms and 28.5% (141/494) were asymptomatic (presurgery screening (35/494) and confirmed case-contact (106/494). The overall sensitivity of the Ag test was 61.1% and the specificity was 99.7%. The sensitivity and specificity in the asymptomatic group were 40% and 100% respectively, and in the symptomatic group 63.5% and 99.6% respectively. In turn, the sensitivity and specificity in the group of symptomatic patients varied according to the time of symptom evolution: in patients with recent symptoms, they were 71.4% and 99.6% respectively, while in patients with symptoms of more than 5 days of evolution, they were 26.7% and 100% respectively. In all groups studied, the presence of antigen is associated with a high viral load (Ct<30 cycles). CONCLUSIONS: The use of Ag detection test is not indicated for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic patients or with symptoms of more than 5 days of evolution, but it could be useful in patients with symptoms of 1-5 days of evolution. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8638769 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Sociedad Española de Quimioterapia |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86387692021-12-10 Evaluación de la validez del Ag PANBIO-COVID19 de Abbott en el diagnóstico de la infección por SARS-CoV-2 en pacientes asintomáticos o con infección leve Gras-Valenti, Paula Vidal, Inmaculada Montiel-Higuero, Inés Escribano, Isabel Algado-Selles, Natividad Chico-Sánchez, Pablo Ventero, Maria Paz Jiménez-Sepulveda, Natali Molina-Pardines, Carmen Merino-Lucas, Esperanza Sánchez- Payá, José Rodríguez, Juan Carlos Rev Esp Quimioter Original OBJECTIVE: To assess the validity of SARS-CoV-2 Antigen (Ag) detection for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in mildly infected or asymptomatic patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Observational study to evaluate diagnostic tests. Non-hospitalized patients with indication for diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 infection were included. The diagnostic test to be evaluated was the determination of Ag and as a reference standard to determine the presence of viral RNA the RT-PCR was used. RESULTS: A total of 494 patients were included. Of these 71.5% (353/494) had symptoms and 28.5% (141/494) were asymptomatic (presurgery screening (35/494) and confirmed case-contact (106/494). The overall sensitivity of the Ag test was 61.1% and the specificity was 99.7%. The sensitivity and specificity in the asymptomatic group were 40% and 100% respectively, and in the symptomatic group 63.5% and 99.6% respectively. In turn, the sensitivity and specificity in the group of symptomatic patients varied according to the time of symptom evolution: in patients with recent symptoms, they were 71.4% and 99.6% respectively, while in patients with symptoms of more than 5 days of evolution, they were 26.7% and 100% respectively. In all groups studied, the presence of antigen is associated with a high viral load (Ct<30 cycles). CONCLUSIONS: The use of Ag detection test is not indicated for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic patients or with symptoms of more than 5 days of evolution, but it could be useful in patients with symptoms of 1-5 days of evolution. Sociedad Española de Quimioterapia 2021-09-22 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8638769/ /pubmed/34549577 http://dx.doi.org/10.37201/req/054.2021 Text en © The Author 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Published by Sociedad Española de Quimioterapia. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Gras-Valenti, Paula Vidal, Inmaculada Montiel-Higuero, Inés Escribano, Isabel Algado-Selles, Natividad Chico-Sánchez, Pablo Ventero, Maria Paz Jiménez-Sepulveda, Natali Molina-Pardines, Carmen Merino-Lucas, Esperanza Sánchez- Payá, José Rodríguez, Juan Carlos Evaluación de la validez del Ag PANBIO-COVID19 de Abbott en el diagnóstico de la infección por SARS-CoV-2 en pacientes asintomáticos o con infección leve |
title | Evaluación de la validez del Ag PANBIO-COVID19 de Abbott en el diagnóstico de la infección por SARS-CoV-2 en pacientes asintomáticos o con infección leve |
title_full | Evaluación de la validez del Ag PANBIO-COVID19 de Abbott en el diagnóstico de la infección por SARS-CoV-2 en pacientes asintomáticos o con infección leve |
title_fullStr | Evaluación de la validez del Ag PANBIO-COVID19 de Abbott en el diagnóstico de la infección por SARS-CoV-2 en pacientes asintomáticos o con infección leve |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluación de la validez del Ag PANBIO-COVID19 de Abbott en el diagnóstico de la infección por SARS-CoV-2 en pacientes asintomáticos o con infección leve |
title_short | Evaluación de la validez del Ag PANBIO-COVID19 de Abbott en el diagnóstico de la infección por SARS-CoV-2 en pacientes asintomáticos o con infección leve |
title_sort | evaluación de la validez del ag panbio-covid19 de abbott en el diagnóstico de la infección por sars-cov-2 en pacientes asintomáticos o con infección leve |
topic | Original |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8638769/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34549577 http://dx.doi.org/10.37201/req/054.2021 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grasvalentipaula evaluaciondelavalidezdelagpanbiocovid19deabbotteneldiagnosticodelainfeccionporsarscov2enpacientesasintomaticosoconinfeccionleve AT vidalinmaculada evaluaciondelavalidezdelagpanbiocovid19deabbotteneldiagnosticodelainfeccionporsarscov2enpacientesasintomaticosoconinfeccionleve AT montielhigueroines evaluaciondelavalidezdelagpanbiocovid19deabbotteneldiagnosticodelainfeccionporsarscov2enpacientesasintomaticosoconinfeccionleve AT escribanoisabel evaluaciondelavalidezdelagpanbiocovid19deabbotteneldiagnosticodelainfeccionporsarscov2enpacientesasintomaticosoconinfeccionleve AT algadosellesnatividad evaluaciondelavalidezdelagpanbiocovid19deabbotteneldiagnosticodelainfeccionporsarscov2enpacientesasintomaticosoconinfeccionleve AT chicosanchezpablo evaluaciondelavalidezdelagpanbiocovid19deabbotteneldiagnosticodelainfeccionporsarscov2enpacientesasintomaticosoconinfeccionleve AT venteromariapaz evaluaciondelavalidezdelagpanbiocovid19deabbotteneldiagnosticodelainfeccionporsarscov2enpacientesasintomaticosoconinfeccionleve AT jimenezsepulvedanatali evaluaciondelavalidezdelagpanbiocovid19deabbotteneldiagnosticodelainfeccionporsarscov2enpacientesasintomaticosoconinfeccionleve AT molinapardinescarmen evaluaciondelavalidezdelagpanbiocovid19deabbotteneldiagnosticodelainfeccionporsarscov2enpacientesasintomaticosoconinfeccionleve AT merinolucasesperanza evaluaciondelavalidezdelagpanbiocovid19deabbotteneldiagnosticodelainfeccionporsarscov2enpacientesasintomaticosoconinfeccionleve AT sanchezpayajose evaluaciondelavalidezdelagpanbiocovid19deabbotteneldiagnosticodelainfeccionporsarscov2enpacientesasintomaticosoconinfeccionleve AT rodriguezjuancarlos evaluaciondelavalidezdelagpanbiocovid19deabbotteneldiagnosticodelainfeccionporsarscov2enpacientesasintomaticosoconinfeccionleve |