Cargando…

A Longitudinal, Geographical, and Descriptive Analysis of Political Contributions of Plastic Surgeons

BACKGROUND: Political contributions from healthcare providers are essential to shaping healthcare policy and allow physicians to expand their influence on a national level. Political Action Committees in particular provide a useful avenue for unifying contributions for the interest of a specific com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wells, Michael W., Chang, Irene A., Gatherwright, James R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8638794/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34859276
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02686-6
_version_ 1784609011312623616
author Wells, Michael W.
Chang, Irene A.
Gatherwright, James R.
author_facet Wells, Michael W.
Chang, Irene A.
Gatherwright, James R.
author_sort Wells, Michael W.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Political contributions from healthcare providers are essential to shaping healthcare policy and allow physicians to expand their influence on a national level. Political Action Committees in particular provide a useful avenue for unifying contributions for the interest of a specific community. This study examined the geographical distribution, temporal pattern, and overall nature of the political contributions made by plastic surgeons. METHODS: The Federal Election Commission was analyzed for political contributions made by plastic surgeons from 2003 to 2021 using the search terms “plastic surgeon,” “microsurgeon,” and “craniofacial” as well as physician contributions to PlastyPAC. Contributions were categorized based on political parties (Democratic, Republican, and independent parties), and further analyzed based on state distribution and year of contribution. Spatial distribution data were then visualized using heatmaps for each state. RESULTS: The total sum of contributions between 2003 and 2021 from plastic surgeons was $5,306,605, with $1,737,178.51 for the Republican party, $962,773.26 for the Democratic party, and $2,604,149.86 for independent parties. Political funding of PlastyPAC consisted of 47.3% of the overall political contributions. There was no significant trend through the years in the overall contribution amount. The states with the most political contributions were California, New York, Florida, and Texas. CONCLUSIONS: The temporal stagnation of total political contributions and decline in recent PlastyPAC funding from plastic surgeons support an increased political awareness for new plastic surgeons. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8638794
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86387942021-12-03 A Longitudinal, Geographical, and Descriptive Analysis of Political Contributions of Plastic Surgeons Wells, Michael W. Chang, Irene A. Gatherwright, James R. Aesthetic Plast Surg Commentary & Discussion BACKGROUND: Political contributions from healthcare providers are essential to shaping healthcare policy and allow physicians to expand their influence on a national level. Political Action Committees in particular provide a useful avenue for unifying contributions for the interest of a specific community. This study examined the geographical distribution, temporal pattern, and overall nature of the political contributions made by plastic surgeons. METHODS: The Federal Election Commission was analyzed for political contributions made by plastic surgeons from 2003 to 2021 using the search terms “plastic surgeon,” “microsurgeon,” and “craniofacial” as well as physician contributions to PlastyPAC. Contributions were categorized based on political parties (Democratic, Republican, and independent parties), and further analyzed based on state distribution and year of contribution. Spatial distribution data were then visualized using heatmaps for each state. RESULTS: The total sum of contributions between 2003 and 2021 from plastic surgeons was $5,306,605, with $1,737,178.51 for the Republican party, $962,773.26 for the Democratic party, and $2,604,149.86 for independent parties. Political funding of PlastyPAC consisted of 47.3% of the overall political contributions. There was no significant trend through the years in the overall contribution amount. The states with the most political contributions were California, New York, Florida, and Texas. CONCLUSIONS: The temporal stagnation of total political contributions and decline in recent PlastyPAC funding from plastic surgeons support an increased political awareness for new plastic surgeons. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266. Springer US 2021-12-02 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8638794/ /pubmed/34859276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02686-6 Text en © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Commentary & Discussion
Wells, Michael W.
Chang, Irene A.
Gatherwright, James R.
A Longitudinal, Geographical, and Descriptive Analysis of Political Contributions of Plastic Surgeons
title A Longitudinal, Geographical, and Descriptive Analysis of Political Contributions of Plastic Surgeons
title_full A Longitudinal, Geographical, and Descriptive Analysis of Political Contributions of Plastic Surgeons
title_fullStr A Longitudinal, Geographical, and Descriptive Analysis of Political Contributions of Plastic Surgeons
title_full_unstemmed A Longitudinal, Geographical, and Descriptive Analysis of Political Contributions of Plastic Surgeons
title_short A Longitudinal, Geographical, and Descriptive Analysis of Political Contributions of Plastic Surgeons
title_sort longitudinal, geographical, and descriptive analysis of political contributions of plastic surgeons
topic Commentary & Discussion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8638794/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34859276
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02686-6
work_keys_str_mv AT wellsmichaelw alongitudinalgeographicalanddescriptiveanalysisofpoliticalcontributionsofplasticsurgeons
AT changirenea alongitudinalgeographicalanddescriptiveanalysisofpoliticalcontributionsofplasticsurgeons
AT gatherwrightjamesr alongitudinalgeographicalanddescriptiveanalysisofpoliticalcontributionsofplasticsurgeons
AT wellsmichaelw longitudinalgeographicalanddescriptiveanalysisofpoliticalcontributionsofplasticsurgeons
AT changirenea longitudinalgeographicalanddescriptiveanalysisofpoliticalcontributionsofplasticsurgeons
AT gatherwrightjamesr longitudinalgeographicalanddescriptiveanalysisofpoliticalcontributionsofplasticsurgeons