Cargando…
Comparison of post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) after isometric and isotonic exercise on vertical jump performance
PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) induced by isometric and isotonic exercise on vertical jump performance. METHODS: 18 healthy trained men (25.8±2.7 years; 78.4±8.2 kg; 175.7±6.1 cm; 25.4±1.8 BMI; 126.72±10.8 kg squat 1-RM) volunteered for this s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8639083/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34855891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260866 |
_version_ | 1784609079481597952 |
---|---|
author | Vargas-Molina, Salvador Salgado-Ramírez, Ulises Chulvi-Medrano, Iván Carbone, Leandro Maroto-Izquierdo, Sergio Benítez-Porres, Javier |
author_facet | Vargas-Molina, Salvador Salgado-Ramírez, Ulises Chulvi-Medrano, Iván Carbone, Leandro Maroto-Izquierdo, Sergio Benítez-Porres, Javier |
author_sort | Vargas-Molina, Salvador |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) induced by isometric and isotonic exercise on vertical jump performance. METHODS: 18 healthy trained men (25.8±2.7 years; 78.4±8.2 kg; 175.7±6.1 cm; 25.4±1.8 BMI; 126.72±10.8 kg squat 1-RM) volunteered for this study. They randomly performed two different PAPE protocols: Isotonic squats (ISOTS), which consisted of 2 sets of 3 repetitions at 75% of one-maximum repetition (1-RM); and isometric squats (ISOMS), which consisted of 2 sets of 4 seconds of submaximal (75% of 1-RM) isometric contraction at 90°-knee flexion. Countermovement jump (CMJ) height was tested at baseline and 4 minutes after each conditioning set. RESULTS: CMJ height significantly increased after set 1 in both PAPE protocols (ISOMS: p <0.001; ES = 0.34; ISOTS: p <0.001; ES = 0.24), with respect to the baseline jump. However, after set 2 no significant changes in CMJ height were observed for any protocol (ISOMS: p = 0.162; ES = 0.11; ISOTS: p = 0.976; ES = 0.06). No significant differences (p>0.05) were found between both isometric and isotonic exercise conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Despite both protocols showed similar PAPE effects on CMJ height after set 1, none of the protocols demonstrated greater efficacy in increasing subsequent performance in healthy trained men. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8639083 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86390832021-12-03 Comparison of post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) after isometric and isotonic exercise on vertical jump performance Vargas-Molina, Salvador Salgado-Ramírez, Ulises Chulvi-Medrano, Iván Carbone, Leandro Maroto-Izquierdo, Sergio Benítez-Porres, Javier PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) induced by isometric and isotonic exercise on vertical jump performance. METHODS: 18 healthy trained men (25.8±2.7 years; 78.4±8.2 kg; 175.7±6.1 cm; 25.4±1.8 BMI; 126.72±10.8 kg squat 1-RM) volunteered for this study. They randomly performed two different PAPE protocols: Isotonic squats (ISOTS), which consisted of 2 sets of 3 repetitions at 75% of one-maximum repetition (1-RM); and isometric squats (ISOMS), which consisted of 2 sets of 4 seconds of submaximal (75% of 1-RM) isometric contraction at 90°-knee flexion. Countermovement jump (CMJ) height was tested at baseline and 4 minutes after each conditioning set. RESULTS: CMJ height significantly increased after set 1 in both PAPE protocols (ISOMS: p <0.001; ES = 0.34; ISOTS: p <0.001; ES = 0.24), with respect to the baseline jump. However, after set 2 no significant changes in CMJ height were observed for any protocol (ISOMS: p = 0.162; ES = 0.11; ISOTS: p = 0.976; ES = 0.06). No significant differences (p>0.05) were found between both isometric and isotonic exercise conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Despite both protocols showed similar PAPE effects on CMJ height after set 1, none of the protocols demonstrated greater efficacy in increasing subsequent performance in healthy trained men. Public Library of Science 2021-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8639083/ /pubmed/34855891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260866 Text en © 2021 Vargas-Molina et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Vargas-Molina, Salvador Salgado-Ramírez, Ulises Chulvi-Medrano, Iván Carbone, Leandro Maroto-Izquierdo, Sergio Benítez-Porres, Javier Comparison of post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) after isometric and isotonic exercise on vertical jump performance |
title | Comparison of post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) after isometric and isotonic exercise on vertical jump performance |
title_full | Comparison of post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) after isometric and isotonic exercise on vertical jump performance |
title_fullStr | Comparison of post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) after isometric and isotonic exercise on vertical jump performance |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) after isometric and isotonic exercise on vertical jump performance |
title_short | Comparison of post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) after isometric and isotonic exercise on vertical jump performance |
title_sort | comparison of post-activation performance enhancement (pape) after isometric and isotonic exercise on vertical jump performance |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8639083/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34855891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260866 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vargasmolinasalvador comparisonofpostactivationperformanceenhancementpapeafterisometricandisotonicexerciseonverticaljumpperformance AT salgadoramirezulises comparisonofpostactivationperformanceenhancementpapeafterisometricandisotonicexerciseonverticaljumpperformance AT chulvimedranoivan comparisonofpostactivationperformanceenhancementpapeafterisometricandisotonicexerciseonverticaljumpperformance AT carboneleandro comparisonofpostactivationperformanceenhancementpapeafterisometricandisotonicexerciseonverticaljumpperformance AT marotoizquierdosergio comparisonofpostactivationperformanceenhancementpapeafterisometricandisotonicexerciseonverticaljumpperformance AT benitezporresjavier comparisonofpostactivationperformanceenhancementpapeafterisometricandisotonicexerciseonverticaljumpperformance |