Cargando…
Discriminative power of an adapted version of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 applied to Brazilian older adults
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the discriminative power of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002. METHODS: A cross sectional study involving one hundred participants aged ≥60 years. The original and adapted versions of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 and the Mini Nutritional Assessment were used. Nutritional R...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8639137/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33111808 http://dx.doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2020AO5309 |
_version_ | 1784609089249083392 |
---|---|
author | Sugaya, Midori Cabral Maio, Regiane Soares, Bruna Lúcia de Mendonça Calado, Cinthia Katiane Martins Morais, Glaucia Queiroz de Arruda, Ilma Kruze Grande Burgos, Maria Goretti Pessoa de Araújo |
author_facet | Sugaya, Midori Cabral Maio, Regiane Soares, Bruna Lúcia de Mendonça Calado, Cinthia Katiane Martins Morais, Glaucia Queiroz de Arruda, Ilma Kruze Grande Burgos, Maria Goretti Pessoa de Araújo |
author_sort | Sugaya, Midori Cabral |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To investigate the discriminative power of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002. METHODS: A cross sectional study involving one hundred participants aged ≥60 years. The original and adapted versions of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 and the Mini Nutritional Assessment were used. Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 adaptation consisted of a lower age cutoff (60 years or older) for addition of one extra point to the final score. RESULTS: Screening using Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 revealed higher nutritional risk among patients aged ≥70 years (p=0.009), whereas screening using the adapted version of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 revealed similar nutritional risk in both age groups (60-69 years and ≥70 years; p=0.117). Frequency of nutritional risk was highest when the Mini Nutritional Assessment was administered (52.7%), followed by the adapted and original versions of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (35.5% and 29.1%, respectively). CONCLUSION: The adapted version of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 was more effective than the original version. However, further studies are needed to confirm these findings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8639137 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86391372022-01-09 Discriminative power of an adapted version of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 applied to Brazilian older adults Sugaya, Midori Cabral Maio, Regiane Soares, Bruna Lúcia de Mendonça Calado, Cinthia Katiane Martins Morais, Glaucia Queiroz de Arruda, Ilma Kruze Grande Burgos, Maria Goretti Pessoa de Araújo Einstein (Sao Paulo) Original Article OBJECTIVE: To investigate the discriminative power of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002. METHODS: A cross sectional study involving one hundred participants aged ≥60 years. The original and adapted versions of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 and the Mini Nutritional Assessment were used. Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 adaptation consisted of a lower age cutoff (60 years or older) for addition of one extra point to the final score. RESULTS: Screening using Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 revealed higher nutritional risk among patients aged ≥70 years (p=0.009), whereas screening using the adapted version of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 revealed similar nutritional risk in both age groups (60-69 years and ≥70 years; p=0.117). Frequency of nutritional risk was highest when the Mini Nutritional Assessment was administered (52.7%), followed by the adapted and original versions of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (35.5% and 29.1%, respectively). CONCLUSION: The adapted version of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 was more effective than the original version. However, further studies are needed to confirm these findings. Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein 2020-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8639137/ /pubmed/33111808 http://dx.doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2020AO5309 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Sugaya, Midori Cabral Maio, Regiane Soares, Bruna Lúcia de Mendonça Calado, Cinthia Katiane Martins Morais, Glaucia Queiroz de Arruda, Ilma Kruze Grande Burgos, Maria Goretti Pessoa de Araújo Discriminative power of an adapted version of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 applied to Brazilian older adults |
title | Discriminative power of an adapted version of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 applied to Brazilian older adults |
title_full | Discriminative power of an adapted version of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 applied to Brazilian older adults |
title_fullStr | Discriminative power of an adapted version of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 applied to Brazilian older adults |
title_full_unstemmed | Discriminative power of an adapted version of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 applied to Brazilian older adults |
title_short | Discriminative power of an adapted version of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 applied to Brazilian older adults |
title_sort | discriminative power of an adapted version of nutritional risk screening 2002 applied to brazilian older adults |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8639137/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33111808 http://dx.doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2020AO5309 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sugayamidoricabral discriminativepowerofanadaptedversionofnutritionalriskscreening2002appliedtobrazilianolderadults AT maioregiane discriminativepowerofanadaptedversionofnutritionalriskscreening2002appliedtobrazilianolderadults AT soaresbrunaluciademendonca discriminativepowerofanadaptedversionofnutritionalriskscreening2002appliedtobrazilianolderadults AT caladocinthiakatianemartins discriminativepowerofanadaptedversionofnutritionalriskscreening2002appliedtobrazilianolderadults AT moraisglauciaqueiroz discriminativepowerofanadaptedversionofnutritionalriskscreening2002appliedtobrazilianolderadults AT dearrudailmakruzegrande discriminativepowerofanadaptedversionofnutritionalriskscreening2002appliedtobrazilianolderadults AT burgosmariagorettipessoadearaujo discriminativepowerofanadaptedversionofnutritionalriskscreening2002appliedtobrazilianolderadults |