Cargando…

Discriminative power of an adapted version of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 applied to Brazilian older adults

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the discriminative power of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002. METHODS: A cross sectional study involving one hundred participants aged ≥60 years. The original and adapted versions of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 and the Mini Nutritional Assessment were used. Nutritional R...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sugaya, Midori Cabral, Maio, Regiane, Soares, Bruna Lúcia de Mendonça, Calado, Cinthia Katiane Martins, Morais, Glaucia Queiroz, de Arruda, Ilma Kruze Grande, Burgos, Maria Goretti Pessoa de Araújo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8639137/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33111808
http://dx.doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2020AO5309
_version_ 1784609089249083392
author Sugaya, Midori Cabral
Maio, Regiane
Soares, Bruna Lúcia de Mendonça
Calado, Cinthia Katiane Martins
Morais, Glaucia Queiroz
de Arruda, Ilma Kruze Grande
Burgos, Maria Goretti Pessoa de Araújo
author_facet Sugaya, Midori Cabral
Maio, Regiane
Soares, Bruna Lúcia de Mendonça
Calado, Cinthia Katiane Martins
Morais, Glaucia Queiroz
de Arruda, Ilma Kruze Grande
Burgos, Maria Goretti Pessoa de Araújo
author_sort Sugaya, Midori Cabral
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To investigate the discriminative power of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002. METHODS: A cross sectional study involving one hundred participants aged ≥60 years. The original and adapted versions of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 and the Mini Nutritional Assessment were used. Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 adaptation consisted of a lower age cutoff (60 years or older) for addition of one extra point to the final score. RESULTS: Screening using Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 revealed higher nutritional risk among patients aged ≥70 years (p=0.009), whereas screening using the adapted version of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 revealed similar nutritional risk in both age groups (60-69 years and ≥70 years; p=0.117). Frequency of nutritional risk was highest when the Mini Nutritional Assessment was administered (52.7%), followed by the adapted and original versions of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (35.5% and 29.1%, respectively). CONCLUSION: The adapted version of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 was more effective than the original version. However, further studies are needed to confirm these findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8639137
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86391372022-01-09 Discriminative power of an adapted version of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 applied to Brazilian older adults Sugaya, Midori Cabral Maio, Regiane Soares, Bruna Lúcia de Mendonça Calado, Cinthia Katiane Martins Morais, Glaucia Queiroz de Arruda, Ilma Kruze Grande Burgos, Maria Goretti Pessoa de Araújo Einstein (Sao Paulo) Original Article OBJECTIVE: To investigate the discriminative power of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002. METHODS: A cross sectional study involving one hundred participants aged ≥60 years. The original and adapted versions of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 and the Mini Nutritional Assessment were used. Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 adaptation consisted of a lower age cutoff (60 years or older) for addition of one extra point to the final score. RESULTS: Screening using Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 revealed higher nutritional risk among patients aged ≥70 years (p=0.009), whereas screening using the adapted version of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 revealed similar nutritional risk in both age groups (60-69 years and ≥70 years; p=0.117). Frequency of nutritional risk was highest when the Mini Nutritional Assessment was administered (52.7%), followed by the adapted and original versions of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (35.5% and 29.1%, respectively). CONCLUSION: The adapted version of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 was more effective than the original version. However, further studies are needed to confirm these findings. Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein 2020-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8639137/ /pubmed/33111808 http://dx.doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2020AO5309 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sugaya, Midori Cabral
Maio, Regiane
Soares, Bruna Lúcia de Mendonça
Calado, Cinthia Katiane Martins
Morais, Glaucia Queiroz
de Arruda, Ilma Kruze Grande
Burgos, Maria Goretti Pessoa de Araújo
Discriminative power of an adapted version of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 applied to Brazilian older adults
title Discriminative power of an adapted version of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 applied to Brazilian older adults
title_full Discriminative power of an adapted version of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 applied to Brazilian older adults
title_fullStr Discriminative power of an adapted version of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 applied to Brazilian older adults
title_full_unstemmed Discriminative power of an adapted version of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 applied to Brazilian older adults
title_short Discriminative power of an adapted version of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 applied to Brazilian older adults
title_sort discriminative power of an adapted version of nutritional risk screening 2002 applied to brazilian older adults
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8639137/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33111808
http://dx.doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2020AO5309
work_keys_str_mv AT sugayamidoricabral discriminativepowerofanadaptedversionofnutritionalriskscreening2002appliedtobrazilianolderadults
AT maioregiane discriminativepowerofanadaptedversionofnutritionalriskscreening2002appliedtobrazilianolderadults
AT soaresbrunaluciademendonca discriminativepowerofanadaptedversionofnutritionalriskscreening2002appliedtobrazilianolderadults
AT caladocinthiakatianemartins discriminativepowerofanadaptedversionofnutritionalriskscreening2002appliedtobrazilianolderadults
AT moraisglauciaqueiroz discriminativepowerofanadaptedversionofnutritionalriskscreening2002appliedtobrazilianolderadults
AT dearrudailmakruzegrande discriminativepowerofanadaptedversionofnutritionalriskscreening2002appliedtobrazilianolderadults
AT burgosmariagorettipessoadearaujo discriminativepowerofanadaptedversionofnutritionalriskscreening2002appliedtobrazilianolderadults