Cargando…

A systematic review of dialectical behavior therapy mobile apps for content and usability

BACKGROUND: The gap between treatment need and treatment availability is particularly wide for individuals seeking Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT), and mobile apps based on DBT may be useful in increasing access to care and augmenting in-person DBT. This review examines DBT based apps, with a spe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wilks, Chelsey R., Gurtovenko, Kyrill, Rebmann, Kevin, Williamson, James, Lovell, Josh, Wasil, Akash R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8639404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34857035
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40479-021-00167-5
_version_ 1784609139800932352
author Wilks, Chelsey R.
Gurtovenko, Kyrill
Rebmann, Kevin
Williamson, James
Lovell, Josh
Wasil, Akash R.
author_facet Wilks, Chelsey R.
Gurtovenko, Kyrill
Rebmann, Kevin
Williamson, James
Lovell, Josh
Wasil, Akash R.
author_sort Wilks, Chelsey R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The gap between treatment need and treatment availability is particularly wide for individuals seeking Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT), and mobile apps based on DBT may be useful in increasing access to care and augmenting in-person DBT. This review examines DBT based apps, with a specific focus on content quality and usability. METHODS: All apps referring to DBT were identified in Google Play and iOS app stores and were systematically reviewed for app content and quality. The Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS) was used to evaluate app usability and engagement. RESULTS: A total of 21 free to download apps were identified. The majority of apps (71%) included a component of skills training, five apps included a diary card feature. Most (76.19%) apps were designed to function without help from a therapist. The average user “star” rating was 4.39 out of 5. The mean overall MARS score was 3.41, with a range of 2.15 to 4.59, and 71.43% were considered minimally ‘acceptable,’ as defined by a score of 3 or higher. The average star rating was correlated with the total MARS score (r = .51, p = .02). Estimates of app usage differed substantially between popular and unpopular apps, with the three most popular apps accounting for 89.3% of monthly active users. CONCLUSIONS: While the present study identified many usable and engaging apps in app stores designed based on DBT, there are limited apps for clinicians. DBT based mobile apps should be carefully developed and clinically evaluated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8639404
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86394042021-12-03 A systematic review of dialectical behavior therapy mobile apps for content and usability Wilks, Chelsey R. Gurtovenko, Kyrill Rebmann, Kevin Williamson, James Lovell, Josh Wasil, Akash R. Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul Research Article BACKGROUND: The gap between treatment need and treatment availability is particularly wide for individuals seeking Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT), and mobile apps based on DBT may be useful in increasing access to care and augmenting in-person DBT. This review examines DBT based apps, with a specific focus on content quality and usability. METHODS: All apps referring to DBT were identified in Google Play and iOS app stores and were systematically reviewed for app content and quality. The Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS) was used to evaluate app usability and engagement. RESULTS: A total of 21 free to download apps were identified. The majority of apps (71%) included a component of skills training, five apps included a diary card feature. Most (76.19%) apps were designed to function without help from a therapist. The average user “star” rating was 4.39 out of 5. The mean overall MARS score was 3.41, with a range of 2.15 to 4.59, and 71.43% were considered minimally ‘acceptable,’ as defined by a score of 3 or higher. The average star rating was correlated with the total MARS score (r = .51, p = .02). Estimates of app usage differed substantially between popular and unpopular apps, with the three most popular apps accounting for 89.3% of monthly active users. CONCLUSIONS: While the present study identified many usable and engaging apps in app stores designed based on DBT, there are limited apps for clinicians. DBT based mobile apps should be carefully developed and clinically evaluated. BioMed Central 2021-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8639404/ /pubmed/34857035 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40479-021-00167-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wilks, Chelsey R.
Gurtovenko, Kyrill
Rebmann, Kevin
Williamson, James
Lovell, Josh
Wasil, Akash R.
A systematic review of dialectical behavior therapy mobile apps for content and usability
title A systematic review of dialectical behavior therapy mobile apps for content and usability
title_full A systematic review of dialectical behavior therapy mobile apps for content and usability
title_fullStr A systematic review of dialectical behavior therapy mobile apps for content and usability
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review of dialectical behavior therapy mobile apps for content and usability
title_short A systematic review of dialectical behavior therapy mobile apps for content and usability
title_sort systematic review of dialectical behavior therapy mobile apps for content and usability
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8639404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34857035
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40479-021-00167-5
work_keys_str_mv AT wilkschelseyr asystematicreviewofdialecticalbehaviortherapymobileappsforcontentandusability
AT gurtovenkokyrill asystematicreviewofdialecticalbehaviortherapymobileappsforcontentandusability
AT rebmannkevin asystematicreviewofdialecticalbehaviortherapymobileappsforcontentandusability
AT williamsonjames asystematicreviewofdialecticalbehaviortherapymobileappsforcontentandusability
AT lovelljosh asystematicreviewofdialecticalbehaviortherapymobileappsforcontentandusability
AT wasilakashr asystematicreviewofdialecticalbehaviortherapymobileappsforcontentandusability
AT wilkschelseyr systematicreviewofdialecticalbehaviortherapymobileappsforcontentandusability
AT gurtovenkokyrill systematicreviewofdialecticalbehaviortherapymobileappsforcontentandusability
AT rebmannkevin systematicreviewofdialecticalbehaviortherapymobileappsforcontentandusability
AT williamsonjames systematicreviewofdialecticalbehaviortherapymobileappsforcontentandusability
AT lovelljosh systematicreviewofdialecticalbehaviortherapymobileappsforcontentandusability
AT wasilakashr systematicreviewofdialecticalbehaviortherapymobileappsforcontentandusability