Cargando…

The Effects of Continuous vs. Intermittent Prism Adaptation Protocols for Treating Visuospatial Neglect: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Visuospatial neglect may interfere with activities of daily living (ADL). Prism adaptation (PA) is one treatment option and may involve two components: recalibration (more strategic) and realignment (more implicit). We examined whether recalibration or realignment is the driving force in neglect reh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scheffels, Jannik Florian, Korabova, Sona, Eling, Paul, Kastrup, Andreas, Hildebrandt, Helmut
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8639507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34867725
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.742727
_version_ 1784609162821369856
author Scheffels, Jannik Florian
Korabova, Sona
Eling, Paul
Kastrup, Andreas
Hildebrandt, Helmut
author_facet Scheffels, Jannik Florian
Korabova, Sona
Eling, Paul
Kastrup, Andreas
Hildebrandt, Helmut
author_sort Scheffels, Jannik Florian
collection PubMed
description Visuospatial neglect may interfere with activities of daily living (ADL). Prism adaptation (PA) is one treatment option and may involve two components: recalibration (more strategic) and realignment (more implicit). We examined whether recalibration or realignment is the driving force in neglect rehabilitation using PA. In a randomized controlled trial with two recruitment series and a cross-over design, 24 neglect patients were allocated to a continuous (PA-c) or intermittent (PA-i) PA procedure. During the PA-c condition, goggles were worn without doffing. In the PA-i condition, patients donned goggles twice (first series of patients) or three times (second series) during training to induce more recalibrations. Primary outcome parameters were performance (omissions) on the Apples Cancellation Test and ADL scores. To assess the efficacy of the PA treatment, we compared effect sizes of the current study with those from three groups from previous studies at the same rehabilitation unit: (1) a passive treatment with a similar intensity, (2) a placebo treatment with a similar intensity, and (3) a PA treatment with fewer therapy sessions. Treatment conditions did not significantly predict scores on primary and most secondary outcome parameters. However, the spontaneous ipsilesional body orientation improved only in patients receiving the PA-i condition and this improvement also appeared in patients showing a strong after-effect (irrespective of condition). Effect sizes for the Apples Cancellation Test and the Functional Independence Measure were larger for both PA treatment protocols than the historical control groups. We conclude that more recalibrations during an intermittent PA treatment may have a beneficial effect on spontaneous body orientation but not on other aspects of neglect or on ADL performance. Clinical Trial Registration: German Clinical Trials Register, identifier: DRKS00018813, DRKS00021539.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8639507
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86395072021-12-04 The Effects of Continuous vs. Intermittent Prism Adaptation Protocols for Treating Visuospatial Neglect: A Randomized Controlled Trial Scheffels, Jannik Florian Korabova, Sona Eling, Paul Kastrup, Andreas Hildebrandt, Helmut Front Neurol Neurology Visuospatial neglect may interfere with activities of daily living (ADL). Prism adaptation (PA) is one treatment option and may involve two components: recalibration (more strategic) and realignment (more implicit). We examined whether recalibration or realignment is the driving force in neglect rehabilitation using PA. In a randomized controlled trial with two recruitment series and a cross-over design, 24 neglect patients were allocated to a continuous (PA-c) or intermittent (PA-i) PA procedure. During the PA-c condition, goggles were worn without doffing. In the PA-i condition, patients donned goggles twice (first series of patients) or three times (second series) during training to induce more recalibrations. Primary outcome parameters were performance (omissions) on the Apples Cancellation Test and ADL scores. To assess the efficacy of the PA treatment, we compared effect sizes of the current study with those from three groups from previous studies at the same rehabilitation unit: (1) a passive treatment with a similar intensity, (2) a placebo treatment with a similar intensity, and (3) a PA treatment with fewer therapy sessions. Treatment conditions did not significantly predict scores on primary and most secondary outcome parameters. However, the spontaneous ipsilesional body orientation improved only in patients receiving the PA-i condition and this improvement also appeared in patients showing a strong after-effect (irrespective of condition). Effect sizes for the Apples Cancellation Test and the Functional Independence Measure were larger for both PA treatment protocols than the historical control groups. We conclude that more recalibrations during an intermittent PA treatment may have a beneficial effect on spontaneous body orientation but not on other aspects of neglect or on ADL performance. Clinical Trial Registration: German Clinical Trials Register, identifier: DRKS00018813, DRKS00021539. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8639507/ /pubmed/34867725 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.742727 Text en Copyright © 2021 Scheffels, Korabova, Eling, Kastrup and Hildebrandt. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Scheffels, Jannik Florian
Korabova, Sona
Eling, Paul
Kastrup, Andreas
Hildebrandt, Helmut
The Effects of Continuous vs. Intermittent Prism Adaptation Protocols for Treating Visuospatial Neglect: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title The Effects of Continuous vs. Intermittent Prism Adaptation Protocols for Treating Visuospatial Neglect: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full The Effects of Continuous vs. Intermittent Prism Adaptation Protocols for Treating Visuospatial Neglect: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr The Effects of Continuous vs. Intermittent Prism Adaptation Protocols for Treating Visuospatial Neglect: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed The Effects of Continuous vs. Intermittent Prism Adaptation Protocols for Treating Visuospatial Neglect: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short The Effects of Continuous vs. Intermittent Prism Adaptation Protocols for Treating Visuospatial Neglect: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort effects of continuous vs. intermittent prism adaptation protocols for treating visuospatial neglect: a randomized controlled trial
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8639507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34867725
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.742727
work_keys_str_mv AT scheffelsjannikflorian theeffectsofcontinuousvsintermittentprismadaptationprotocolsfortreatingvisuospatialneglectarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT korabovasona theeffectsofcontinuousvsintermittentprismadaptationprotocolsfortreatingvisuospatialneglectarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT elingpaul theeffectsofcontinuousvsintermittentprismadaptationprotocolsfortreatingvisuospatialneglectarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kastrupandreas theeffectsofcontinuousvsintermittentprismadaptationprotocolsfortreatingvisuospatialneglectarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hildebrandthelmut theeffectsofcontinuousvsintermittentprismadaptationprotocolsfortreatingvisuospatialneglectarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT scheffelsjannikflorian effectsofcontinuousvsintermittentprismadaptationprotocolsfortreatingvisuospatialneglectarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT korabovasona effectsofcontinuousvsintermittentprismadaptationprotocolsfortreatingvisuospatialneglectarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT elingpaul effectsofcontinuousvsintermittentprismadaptationprotocolsfortreatingvisuospatialneglectarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kastrupandreas effectsofcontinuousvsintermittentprismadaptationprotocolsfortreatingvisuospatialneglectarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hildebrandthelmut effectsofcontinuousvsintermittentprismadaptationprotocolsfortreatingvisuospatialneglectarandomizedcontrolledtrial