Cargando…

A three-dimensional measurement method on MR arthrography of the hip to classify femoro-acetabular impingement

PURPOSE: (1) To investigate correlations between different types of FAI and the ratio of acetabular volume (AV) to femoral head volume (FV) on MR arthrography. (2) To assess 2D/3D measurements in identifying different types of FAI by means of cut-off values of AV/FV ratio (AFR). MATERIALS AND METHOD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nardi, Cosimo, De Falco, Luisa, Caracchini, Giuseppe, Calistri, Linda, Mercatelli, Laura, Cristin, Stefano, Lorini, Chiara, Cavigli, Edoardo, Landini, Nicholas, Orlandi, Martina, Carulli, Christian, Miele, Vittorio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Singapore 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8639539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34181177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11604-021-01162-0
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: (1) To investigate correlations between different types of FAI and the ratio of acetabular volume (AV) to femoral head volume (FV) on MR arthrography. (2) To assess 2D/3D measurements in identifying different types of FAI by means of cut-off values of AV/FV ratio (AFR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Alpha angle, cranial acetabular version, acetabular depth, lateral center edge angle, AV, and FV of 52 hip MR arthrography were measured. ANOVA test correlated different types of FAI with AFR. ROC curves classified FAI by cut-off values of AFR. Accuracy of 2D/3D measurements was calculated. RESULTS: ANOVA test showed a significant difference of AFR (p value < 0.001) among the three types of FAI. The mean values of AFR were 0.64, 0.74, and 0.89 in cam, mixed, and pincer types, respectively. Cut-off values of AFR were 0.70 to distinguish cam types from mixed and pincer types, and 0.79 to distinguish pincer types from cam and mixed types. Cut-off values identified 100%, 73.9%, and 55.6% of pincer, cam, and mixed types. 2D and 3D classifications of FAI showed accuracy of 40.4% and 73.0%. CONCLUSIONS: 3D measurements were clearly more accurate than 2D measurements. Distinct cut-off values of AFR discriminated cam types from pincer types and identified pincer types in all cases. Cam and mixed types were not accurately recognized.