Cargando…
Non-invasive predictors for infranodal conduction delay in patients with left bundle branch block after TAVR
AIMS: Left bundle branch block (LBBB) is the most common conduction disorder after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with an increased risk of atrioventricular (AV) block. The aim of the current study was to identify non-invasive predictors for infranodal conduction delay in patients wit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8639549/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34448041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-021-01924-w |
_version_ | 1784609173046034432 |
---|---|
author | Auberson, Chloé Badertscher, Patrick Madaffari, Antonio Malushi, Meriton Bourquin, Luc Spies, Florian Aeschbacher, Stefanie Fahrni, Gregor Kaiser, Christoph Jeger, Raban Osswald, Stefan Sticherling, Christian Knecht, Sven Kühne, Michael |
author_facet | Auberson, Chloé Badertscher, Patrick Madaffari, Antonio Malushi, Meriton Bourquin, Luc Spies, Florian Aeschbacher, Stefanie Fahrni, Gregor Kaiser, Christoph Jeger, Raban Osswald, Stefan Sticherling, Christian Knecht, Sven Kühne, Michael |
author_sort | Auberson, Chloé |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: Left bundle branch block (LBBB) is the most common conduction disorder after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with an increased risk of atrioventricular (AV) block. The aim of the current study was to identify non-invasive predictors for infranodal conduction delay in patients with LBBB. METHODS: We analyzed consecutive patients undergoing TAVR with pre-existing or new-onset LBBB between August 2014 and August 2020. His ventricular (HV) interval measurement was performed on day 1 after TAVR. Baseline, procedural, as well as surface and intracardiac electrocardiographic parameters were included. Infranodal conduction delay was defined as HV interval > 55 ms. RESULTS: Of 825 patients screened after TAVR, 151 patients (82 ± 6 years, 39% male) with LBBB were included. Among these, infranodal conduction delay was observed in 25%. ΔPR (difference in PR interval after and before TAVR), PR and QRS duration after TAVR were significantly longer in the group with HV prolongation. In a multivariate analysis in patients with sinus rhythm (n = 123), ΔPR (OR per 10 ms increase: 1.52; 95%CI: 1.19–2.01; p = 0.002) was the only independent factor associated with infranodal conduction delay. A change in PR interval by 20 ms yielded a specificity of 83% and a sensitivity of 46%, with a negative predictive value of 84% and a positive predictive value of 45% to predict HV prolongation. CONCLUSIONS: Simple analysis of surface ECG and a calculated ΔPR < 20 ms can be used as predictor for the absence of infranodal conduction delay in post-TAVR patients with LBBB. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00392-021-01924-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8639549 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86395492021-12-03 Non-invasive predictors for infranodal conduction delay in patients with left bundle branch block after TAVR Auberson, Chloé Badertscher, Patrick Madaffari, Antonio Malushi, Meriton Bourquin, Luc Spies, Florian Aeschbacher, Stefanie Fahrni, Gregor Kaiser, Christoph Jeger, Raban Osswald, Stefan Sticherling, Christian Knecht, Sven Kühne, Michael Clin Res Cardiol Original Paper AIMS: Left bundle branch block (LBBB) is the most common conduction disorder after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with an increased risk of atrioventricular (AV) block. The aim of the current study was to identify non-invasive predictors for infranodal conduction delay in patients with LBBB. METHODS: We analyzed consecutive patients undergoing TAVR with pre-existing or new-onset LBBB between August 2014 and August 2020. His ventricular (HV) interval measurement was performed on day 1 after TAVR. Baseline, procedural, as well as surface and intracardiac electrocardiographic parameters were included. Infranodal conduction delay was defined as HV interval > 55 ms. RESULTS: Of 825 patients screened after TAVR, 151 patients (82 ± 6 years, 39% male) with LBBB were included. Among these, infranodal conduction delay was observed in 25%. ΔPR (difference in PR interval after and before TAVR), PR and QRS duration after TAVR were significantly longer in the group with HV prolongation. In a multivariate analysis in patients with sinus rhythm (n = 123), ΔPR (OR per 10 ms increase: 1.52; 95%CI: 1.19–2.01; p = 0.002) was the only independent factor associated with infranodal conduction delay. A change in PR interval by 20 ms yielded a specificity of 83% and a sensitivity of 46%, with a negative predictive value of 84% and a positive predictive value of 45% to predict HV prolongation. CONCLUSIONS: Simple analysis of surface ECG and a calculated ΔPR < 20 ms can be used as predictor for the absence of infranodal conduction delay in post-TAVR patients with LBBB. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00392-021-01924-w. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-08-26 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8639549/ /pubmed/34448041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-021-01924-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Auberson, Chloé Badertscher, Patrick Madaffari, Antonio Malushi, Meriton Bourquin, Luc Spies, Florian Aeschbacher, Stefanie Fahrni, Gregor Kaiser, Christoph Jeger, Raban Osswald, Stefan Sticherling, Christian Knecht, Sven Kühne, Michael Non-invasive predictors for infranodal conduction delay in patients with left bundle branch block after TAVR |
title | Non-invasive predictors for infranodal conduction delay in patients with left bundle branch block after TAVR |
title_full | Non-invasive predictors for infranodal conduction delay in patients with left bundle branch block after TAVR |
title_fullStr | Non-invasive predictors for infranodal conduction delay in patients with left bundle branch block after TAVR |
title_full_unstemmed | Non-invasive predictors for infranodal conduction delay in patients with left bundle branch block after TAVR |
title_short | Non-invasive predictors for infranodal conduction delay in patients with left bundle branch block after TAVR |
title_sort | non-invasive predictors for infranodal conduction delay in patients with left bundle branch block after tavr |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8639549/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34448041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-021-01924-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aubersonchloe noninvasivepredictorsforinfranodalconductiondelayinpatientswithleftbundlebranchblockaftertavr AT badertscherpatrick noninvasivepredictorsforinfranodalconductiondelayinpatientswithleftbundlebranchblockaftertavr AT madaffariantonio noninvasivepredictorsforinfranodalconductiondelayinpatientswithleftbundlebranchblockaftertavr AT malushimeriton noninvasivepredictorsforinfranodalconductiondelayinpatientswithleftbundlebranchblockaftertavr AT bourquinluc noninvasivepredictorsforinfranodalconductiondelayinpatientswithleftbundlebranchblockaftertavr AT spiesflorian noninvasivepredictorsforinfranodalconductiondelayinpatientswithleftbundlebranchblockaftertavr AT aeschbacherstefanie noninvasivepredictorsforinfranodalconductiondelayinpatientswithleftbundlebranchblockaftertavr AT fahrnigregor noninvasivepredictorsforinfranodalconductiondelayinpatientswithleftbundlebranchblockaftertavr AT kaiserchristoph noninvasivepredictorsforinfranodalconductiondelayinpatientswithleftbundlebranchblockaftertavr AT jegerraban noninvasivepredictorsforinfranodalconductiondelayinpatientswithleftbundlebranchblockaftertavr AT osswaldstefan noninvasivepredictorsforinfranodalconductiondelayinpatientswithleftbundlebranchblockaftertavr AT sticherlingchristian noninvasivepredictorsforinfranodalconductiondelayinpatientswithleftbundlebranchblockaftertavr AT knechtsven noninvasivepredictorsforinfranodalconductiondelayinpatientswithleftbundlebranchblockaftertavr AT kuhnemichael noninvasivepredictorsforinfranodalconductiondelayinpatientswithleftbundlebranchblockaftertavr |