Cargando…

Brain rhythms define distinct interaction networks with differential dependence on anatomy

Cognitive functions are subserved by rhythmic neuronal synchronization across widely distributed brain areas. In 105 area pairs, we investigated functional connectivity (FC) through coherence, power correlation, and Granger causality (GC) in the theta, beta, high-beta, and gamma rhythms. Between rhy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vezoli, Julien, Vinck, Martin, Bosman, Conrado Arturo, Bastos, André Moraes, Lewis, Christopher Murphy, Kennedy, Henry, Fries, Pascal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cell Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8639786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34672985
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2021.09.052
_version_ 1784609208598003712
author Vezoli, Julien
Vinck, Martin
Bosman, Conrado Arturo
Bastos, André Moraes
Lewis, Christopher Murphy
Kennedy, Henry
Fries, Pascal
author_facet Vezoli, Julien
Vinck, Martin
Bosman, Conrado Arturo
Bastos, André Moraes
Lewis, Christopher Murphy
Kennedy, Henry
Fries, Pascal
author_sort Vezoli, Julien
collection PubMed
description Cognitive functions are subserved by rhythmic neuronal synchronization across widely distributed brain areas. In 105 area pairs, we investigated functional connectivity (FC) through coherence, power correlation, and Granger causality (GC) in the theta, beta, high-beta, and gamma rhythms. Between rhythms, spatial FC patterns were largely independent. Thus, the rhythms defined distinct interaction networks. Importantly, networks of coherence and GC were not explained by the spatial distributions of the strengths of the rhythms. Those networks, particularly the GC networks, contained clear modules, with typically one dominant rhythm per module. To understand how this distinctiveness and modularity arises on a common anatomical backbone, we correlated, across 91 area pairs, the metrics of functional interaction with those of anatomical projection strength. Anatomy was primarily related to coherence and GC, with the largest effect sizes for GC. The correlation differed markedly between rhythms, being less pronounced for the beta and strongest for the gamma rhythm.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8639786
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cell Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86397862021-12-17 Brain rhythms define distinct interaction networks with differential dependence on anatomy Vezoli, Julien Vinck, Martin Bosman, Conrado Arturo Bastos, André Moraes Lewis, Christopher Murphy Kennedy, Henry Fries, Pascal Neuron Article Cognitive functions are subserved by rhythmic neuronal synchronization across widely distributed brain areas. In 105 area pairs, we investigated functional connectivity (FC) through coherence, power correlation, and Granger causality (GC) in the theta, beta, high-beta, and gamma rhythms. Between rhythms, spatial FC patterns were largely independent. Thus, the rhythms defined distinct interaction networks. Importantly, networks of coherence and GC were not explained by the spatial distributions of the strengths of the rhythms. Those networks, particularly the GC networks, contained clear modules, with typically one dominant rhythm per module. To understand how this distinctiveness and modularity arises on a common anatomical backbone, we correlated, across 91 area pairs, the metrics of functional interaction with those of anatomical projection strength. Anatomy was primarily related to coherence and GC, with the largest effect sizes for GC. The correlation differed markedly between rhythms, being less pronounced for the beta and strongest for the gamma rhythm. Cell Press 2021-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8639786/ /pubmed/34672985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2021.09.052 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Vezoli, Julien
Vinck, Martin
Bosman, Conrado Arturo
Bastos, André Moraes
Lewis, Christopher Murphy
Kennedy, Henry
Fries, Pascal
Brain rhythms define distinct interaction networks with differential dependence on anatomy
title Brain rhythms define distinct interaction networks with differential dependence on anatomy
title_full Brain rhythms define distinct interaction networks with differential dependence on anatomy
title_fullStr Brain rhythms define distinct interaction networks with differential dependence on anatomy
title_full_unstemmed Brain rhythms define distinct interaction networks with differential dependence on anatomy
title_short Brain rhythms define distinct interaction networks with differential dependence on anatomy
title_sort brain rhythms define distinct interaction networks with differential dependence on anatomy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8639786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34672985
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2021.09.052
work_keys_str_mv AT vezolijulien brainrhythmsdefinedistinctinteractionnetworkswithdifferentialdependenceonanatomy
AT vinckmartin brainrhythmsdefinedistinctinteractionnetworkswithdifferentialdependenceonanatomy
AT bosmanconradoarturo brainrhythmsdefinedistinctinteractionnetworkswithdifferentialdependenceonanatomy
AT bastosandremoraes brainrhythmsdefinedistinctinteractionnetworkswithdifferentialdependenceonanatomy
AT lewischristophermurphy brainrhythmsdefinedistinctinteractionnetworkswithdifferentialdependenceonanatomy
AT kennedyhenry brainrhythmsdefinedistinctinteractionnetworkswithdifferentialdependenceonanatomy
AT friespascal brainrhythmsdefinedistinctinteractionnetworkswithdifferentialdependenceonanatomy