Cargando…
Brain rhythms define distinct interaction networks with differential dependence on anatomy
Cognitive functions are subserved by rhythmic neuronal synchronization across widely distributed brain areas. In 105 area pairs, we investigated functional connectivity (FC) through coherence, power correlation, and Granger causality (GC) in the theta, beta, high-beta, and gamma rhythms. Between rhy...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cell Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8639786/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34672985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2021.09.052 |
_version_ | 1784609208598003712 |
---|---|
author | Vezoli, Julien Vinck, Martin Bosman, Conrado Arturo Bastos, André Moraes Lewis, Christopher Murphy Kennedy, Henry Fries, Pascal |
author_facet | Vezoli, Julien Vinck, Martin Bosman, Conrado Arturo Bastos, André Moraes Lewis, Christopher Murphy Kennedy, Henry Fries, Pascal |
author_sort | Vezoli, Julien |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cognitive functions are subserved by rhythmic neuronal synchronization across widely distributed brain areas. In 105 area pairs, we investigated functional connectivity (FC) through coherence, power correlation, and Granger causality (GC) in the theta, beta, high-beta, and gamma rhythms. Between rhythms, spatial FC patterns were largely independent. Thus, the rhythms defined distinct interaction networks. Importantly, networks of coherence and GC were not explained by the spatial distributions of the strengths of the rhythms. Those networks, particularly the GC networks, contained clear modules, with typically one dominant rhythm per module. To understand how this distinctiveness and modularity arises on a common anatomical backbone, we correlated, across 91 area pairs, the metrics of functional interaction with those of anatomical projection strength. Anatomy was primarily related to coherence and GC, with the largest effect sizes for GC. The correlation differed markedly between rhythms, being less pronounced for the beta and strongest for the gamma rhythm. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8639786 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Cell Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86397862021-12-17 Brain rhythms define distinct interaction networks with differential dependence on anatomy Vezoli, Julien Vinck, Martin Bosman, Conrado Arturo Bastos, André Moraes Lewis, Christopher Murphy Kennedy, Henry Fries, Pascal Neuron Article Cognitive functions are subserved by rhythmic neuronal synchronization across widely distributed brain areas. In 105 area pairs, we investigated functional connectivity (FC) through coherence, power correlation, and Granger causality (GC) in the theta, beta, high-beta, and gamma rhythms. Between rhythms, spatial FC patterns were largely independent. Thus, the rhythms defined distinct interaction networks. Importantly, networks of coherence and GC were not explained by the spatial distributions of the strengths of the rhythms. Those networks, particularly the GC networks, contained clear modules, with typically one dominant rhythm per module. To understand how this distinctiveness and modularity arises on a common anatomical backbone, we correlated, across 91 area pairs, the metrics of functional interaction with those of anatomical projection strength. Anatomy was primarily related to coherence and GC, with the largest effect sizes for GC. The correlation differed markedly between rhythms, being less pronounced for the beta and strongest for the gamma rhythm. Cell Press 2021-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8639786/ /pubmed/34672985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2021.09.052 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Vezoli, Julien Vinck, Martin Bosman, Conrado Arturo Bastos, André Moraes Lewis, Christopher Murphy Kennedy, Henry Fries, Pascal Brain rhythms define distinct interaction networks with differential dependence on anatomy |
title | Brain rhythms define distinct interaction networks with differential dependence on anatomy |
title_full | Brain rhythms define distinct interaction networks with differential dependence on anatomy |
title_fullStr | Brain rhythms define distinct interaction networks with differential dependence on anatomy |
title_full_unstemmed | Brain rhythms define distinct interaction networks with differential dependence on anatomy |
title_short | Brain rhythms define distinct interaction networks with differential dependence on anatomy |
title_sort | brain rhythms define distinct interaction networks with differential dependence on anatomy |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8639786/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34672985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2021.09.052 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vezolijulien brainrhythmsdefinedistinctinteractionnetworkswithdifferentialdependenceonanatomy AT vinckmartin brainrhythmsdefinedistinctinteractionnetworkswithdifferentialdependenceonanatomy AT bosmanconradoarturo brainrhythmsdefinedistinctinteractionnetworkswithdifferentialdependenceonanatomy AT bastosandremoraes brainrhythmsdefinedistinctinteractionnetworkswithdifferentialdependenceonanatomy AT lewischristophermurphy brainrhythmsdefinedistinctinteractionnetworkswithdifferentialdependenceonanatomy AT kennedyhenry brainrhythmsdefinedistinctinteractionnetworkswithdifferentialdependenceonanatomy AT friespascal brainrhythmsdefinedistinctinteractionnetworkswithdifferentialdependenceonanatomy |